{"id":102,"date":"2009-05-04T21:48:44","date_gmt":"2009-05-04T21:48:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wp\/2009\/05\/the_big_newspaper_e-reader_gam\/"},"modified":"2009-05-04T21:48:44","modified_gmt":"2009-05-04T21:48:44","slug":"the_big_newspaper_e-reader_gam","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/2009\/05\/the_big_newspaper_e-reader_gam.html","title":{"rendered":"The Big Newspaper E-Reader Gamble"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Several new large-format e-readers are about to go on sale. Newspaper execs <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2009\/05\/04\/technology\/companies\/04reader.html?_r=1&amp;hpw\">are excited<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>These devices from Amazon and other manufacturers offer an almost<br \/>\nirresistible proposition to newspaper and magazine industries. They<br \/>\nwould allow publishers to save millions on the cost of printing and<br \/>\ndistributing their publications, at precisely a time when their<br \/>\nbusinesses are under historic levels of pressure&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>Perhaps most appealing about this new class of reading gadgets is<br \/>\nthe opportunity they offer publishers to rethink their strategy in a<br \/>\nrapidly evolving digital world. The move by newspapers and magazines to<br \/>\nm<span style=\"margin: -20px 0pt 0pt -20px; background: transparent url(http:\/\/graphics8.nytimes.com\/images\/global\/word_reference\/ref_bubble.png) repeat scroll 0% 0%; position: absolute; -moz-background-clip: -moz-initial; -moz-background-origin: -moz-initial; -moz-background-inline-policy: -moz-initial; width: 25px; height: 29px; cursor: pointer;\" title=\"Lookup Word\" id=\"nytd_selection_button\" class=\"nytd_selection_button\"><\/span>ake<br \/>\ntheir material freely available on the Web is now viewed by many as a<br \/>\ncritical blunder that encouraged readers to stop paying for the print<br \/>\nversions. And publishers have found that they were not prepared to deal<br \/>\nwith the recent rapid decline of print advertising revenue. <\/p>\n<p>Publishers<br \/>\ncould possibly use these new mobile reading devices to hit the reset<br \/>\nbutton and return in some form to their original business model:<br \/>\nselling subscriptions, and supporting their articles with ads. <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Maybe. The most popular e-reader right now is the iPhone, and it works pretty well. But will readers pay $9.99 a month for the New York Times? Doubtful, but we&#8217;ll see. The mobile readers have some challenges:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The screens, which are currently in the Kindle and <a href=\"http:\/\/topics.nytimes.com\/top\/news\/business\/companies\/sony_corporation\/index.html?inline=nyt-org\" title=\"More information about SONY Corporation\">Sony<\/a><br \/>\nReader, display no color or video and update images at a slower rate<br \/>\nthan traditional computer screens. <\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>They also update only once&nbsp; a day. And expecting readers to pay for each publication seems naive. &#8220;Another hitch is that some makers of reading devices, like Amazon, want<br \/>\nto set their own subscription prices for publications and control the<br \/>\nrelationship with the subscriber &#8212; something media companies like Cond\u00e9<br \/>\nNast object to.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>In short, by most measures the portables offer less than readers can get for free on the internet. The one advantage is portability; we&#8217;ll see if that&#8217;s enough of a lure.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Several new large-format e-readers are about to go on sale. Newspaper execs are excited: These devices from Amazon and other manufacturers offer an almost irresistible proposition to newspaper and magazine industries. They would allow publishers to save millions on the cost of printing and distributing their publications, at precisely a time when their businesses are [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-102","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-uncategorized","7":"entry"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p4ePZm-1E","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":75,"url":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/2009\/04\/ap_throws_a_tantrum_but_tantru.html","url_meta":{"origin":102,"position":0},"title":"AP Throws A Tantrum (But Tantrums Do Not A Successful Business Model Make)","author":"Douglas McLennan","date":"April 6, 2009","format":false,"excerpt":"AP says it will \"take action\" against web aggregators that don't pay fees for linking to AP stories. Taking aim at the way news is spread across the Internet, The Associated Press said on Monday that it will demand that Web sites obtain permission to use the work of The\u2026","rel":"","context":"With 5 comments","block_context":{"text":"With 5 comments","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/2009\/04\/ap_throws_a_tantrum_but_tantru.html#comments"},"img":{"alt_text":"apbuilding (2).jpg","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/apbuilding%20%282%29.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":92,"url":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/2009\/04\/a_plan_to_help_newspapers_that.html","url_meta":{"origin":102,"position":1},"title":"A Plan To Help Newspapers That Will Hasten Their Demise?","author":"Douglas McLennan","date":"April 17, 2009","format":false,"excerpt":"The high-profile launch this week of an effort to create a paid pass to access news content got a lot of attention because of the principals involved. JournalismOnline is the idea of veteran media execs Steven Brill, Gordon Crovitz, and Leo Hindery. Their venture aims to supply publishers with ready-made\u2026","rel":"","context":"With 2 comments","block_context":{"text":"With 2 comments","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/2009\/04\/a_plan_to_help_newspapers_that.html#comments"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":351,"url":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/2009\/05\/if_is_was_just_about_the_money-2.html","url_meta":{"origin":102,"position":2},"title":"If It Was Just About The Money We&#039;d All Be Making Porn","author":"Douglas McLennan","date":"May 14, 2009","format":false,"excerpt":"A movie studio exec once told me that if it were true that Hollywood was only interested in making money, the studios would have long ago ditched what they were doing and made porn. Huge money in porn, apparently. Who knew? Much as it's easy to dismiss the moguls for\u2026","rel":"","context":"With 12 comments","block_context":{"text":"With 12 comments","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/2009\/05\/if_is_was_just_about_the_money-2.html#comments"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":99,"url":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/2009\/04\/be_the_curator.html","url_meta":{"origin":102,"position":3},"title":"Power Law &#8211; Why Arts Organizations Need To Reinvent","author":"Douglas McLennan","date":"April 29, 2009","format":false,"excerpt":"Newspaper publishers have been lashing out at Google for aggregating headlines and selling ads on the news feeds. The criticisms are controversial (my thoughts here). Google directs huge rivers of traffic to news stories, and publications like that. But aggregation has in some ways come to compete with the news\u2026","rel":"","context":"With 2 comments","block_context":{"text":"With 2 comments","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/2009\/04\/be_the_curator.html#comments"},"img":{"alt_text":"reinventing.jpg","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/reinventing.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":69,"url":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/2009\/03\/the_next_newspaper_casualty.html","url_meta":{"origin":102,"position":4},"title":"The Next Newspaper Casualty?","author":"Douglas McLennan","date":"March 31, 2009","format":false,"excerpt":"The latest newspaper to teeter to the edge of existence is the Chicago Sun-Times, which has just filed for bankruptcy, joining a half dozen other major papers: The company has one significant creditor -- the Internal Revenue Service. The IRS has said Sun-Times Media Group owes up to $608 million\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":347,"url":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/2009\/04\/my_newspaper_wont_leave_me_alo-2.html","url_meta":{"origin":102,"position":5},"title":"My newspaper won&#039;t leave me alone","author":"Douglas McLennan","date":"April 1, 2009","format":false,"excerpt":"Back in January I finally canceled my subscription to the daily newspaper. Tough (and symbolic) thing to do. I've always subscribed to the local paper. My paper had become thinner and thinner as the stories I used to buy it for drained away with cuts in space and staff. Many\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/102","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=102"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/102\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=102"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=102"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=102"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}