{"id":70,"date":"2005-01-16T11:33:23","date_gmt":"2005-01-16T11:33:23","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/artopia\/wp\/?p=70"},"modified":"2011-09-04T18:07:18","modified_gmt":"2011-09-04T22:07:18","slug":"bruce_conners_luke","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/artopia\/2005\/01\/bruce_conners_luke.html","title":{"rendered":"BRUCE CONNER&#8217;S LUKE"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><P><\/P><br \/>\n<P><IMG src=\"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/artopia\/images\/luke.jpg\" width=360><\/P><br \/>\n<P><FONT size=1>Bruce Conner: <EM>Luke<\/EM><\/FONT>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <\/FONT><\/P><br \/>\n<P><STRONG>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Not Lukewarm<\/STRONG><\/FONT><\/P><br \/>\n<P>You get beautiful blurred images, motion streaks, bare-chested male &#8220;zombies&#8221; shoveling dirt, moody music, behind-the-scenes views of a movie scene; nearly Muybridge-ian, almost dancelike motion-analysis of lumbering extras, key grips, gaffers, best boys, and script girls in jagged slow-motion; punctuating shots of empty canvas chairs and big reflectors; all in chalky and\/or glowing colors, plusPaul Newman. In 22 minutes flat. Who could ask for anything more?<\/FONT><\/P><br \/>\n<P>Although the projected film as gallery art has not yet outworn its welcome, I hate coming in in the middle of a film, which usually happens. A film, a movie, a DVD, a video is not a painting. Why is it so difficult to get rid of the linear? Beginnings and endings? We prefer loops.<\/FONT><\/P><br \/>\n<P>Nevertheless, Bruce Conner&#8217;s <EM>Luke<\/EM> at <STRONG><A href=\"http:\/\/www.gladstonegallery.com\/home.html\">Barbara Gladstone<\/A><\/STRONG> (515 West 24th St., to Jan. 29) goes far to justify that trendy mode of presentation. <\/FONT><\/P><br \/>\n<P>Also featured are two rooms of Connor&#8217;s 1978 San Francisco punk-scene photographs. I like individual shots (the messier and the more rambunctious the better), but I see them all together as a film, each photograph a single frame, passing by in the blink of an eye. Like Punk itself.<\/FONT><\/P><br \/>\n<P>Unless you are a diehard black-and-white photo fan, <EM>Luke<\/EM> is the main draw.<\/FONT><\/P><br \/>\n<P>Because he was a buddy of the young actor\/photographer Dennis Hopper, Conner was able to film one day of a shoot during the making of Stuart Rosenberg&#8217;s 1967 <EM>Cool Hand Luke<\/EM>, using his wee 8mm camera. Conner recently told poet\/critic John Yau in the<A href=\"http:\/\/www.thebrooklynrail.org\/arts\/nov04\/conner.html\">Brooklyn Rail<\/A>that since he limited himself to one reel and did all the editing in the camera, his entire production cost was three dollars. <\/FONT><\/P><br \/>\n<P>The first time around, Conner showed his footage five frames per second rather than the standard 24, thus stretching the two-and-a-half minute filmed running time to 15 minutes of projection time. Two years ago &#8212; at the request of composer Patrick Gleeson, who wanted to add music &#8212; the 16mm version was transferred to DVD at three frames per minute, yielding the current 22-minute length.<\/FONT><\/P><br \/>\n<P>Conner was born in 1933, and <EM>Luke<\/EM> in its present form is one of those career-confirming mature works of art. And although we may yearn to see some of the artist&#8217;s moldering assemblage sculptures &#8212; using nylon stockings among other things &#8212; <EM>Luke<\/EM> in the meantime will send you running to your local video store&#8217;s avant-garde section to catch up on this West Coast artist&#8217;s masterful found-footage films.<\/FONT><\/P><br \/>\n<P>I rented one compilation (<EM>Bruce Conner Films II<\/EM>, Facets Video) that has, in this order:<\/FONT><\/P><br \/>\n<P><EM>Ten Second Film<\/EM> (1965). Spliced leader adding up to 10 breakneck seconds of film leader. START, the one-armed clock. Numbers. This is not only the best 10-second film ever made, it is also one of the best found-footage films. It&#8217;s abstract without being nonrepresentational.<\/FONT><\/P><br \/>\n<P><EM>Permian Strata<\/EM> (1969). A collage of found scenes from a silent Biblical epic to the tune of Bob Dylan&#8217;s <EM>Everybody Must Get Stoned<\/EM>, featuring the hero being stoned and thenSaul (soon to be St. Paul) being struck down by God.<\/FONT><\/P><br \/>\n<P><EM>Mongoloid <\/EM>(1977). With a charming soundtrack of the offensive ditty &#8220;Mongoloid was a mongoloid and it determined what he could be.&#8221; Footage of science demonstrations, animated diagrams, and (!) a man pulling a bus with his teeth, but also a similar &#8220;square&#8221; being transported in a giant suitcase. <\/FONT><\/P><br \/>\n<P><EM>America is Waiting<\/EM> (1981). People entering bomb shelters, advertising for a toy gun, an Arid Roll-on clip, Mount Rushmore, and at least two superimposed full-screen titles: &#8220;What Can Be Done About Larry&#8217;s Personal Problems&#8221; and &#8220;No Will Whatsoever.&#8221; And, oh yes, appliances rolling past the silhouette of a jazz band; all to tick-tock music by David Byrne and Brian Eno.<\/FONT><\/P><br \/>\n<P><EM>A Movie<\/EM> (1958). Although it started as a sculpture component, this is the Conner movie masterpiece. At the beginning is THE END; the title A MOVIE is interposed throughout. Conner THE END sandwiches atom-bomb explosions, A MOVIE bridge collapse, Teddy Roosevelt BY and, during footage BRUCE CONNER of cowboys chasing Indians, suddenly there is an elephant.<\/FONT><\/P><br \/>\n<P>Suddenly There Is an Elephant. That says it all. <\/FONT><\/P><br \/>\n<P>Conner, in his classics, juggles context and time. <EM>A Movie<\/EM> is a symphony depicting the dreamlife of TV addicts, movie junkies, a movie for us and of us. Even the &#8220;hopeful&#8221; ending of sun on water is probably a metaphysical, anti-Hollywood joke.<\/FONT><\/P><br \/>\n<P>In comparison Luke is cool. There is no elephant. For 22 minutes the camera seems to hold its breath. You too hold your breath. <\/FONT><\/P><br \/>\n<P>Many projected digital films are like watching paint dry. Here, this is not the case. Nor is <EM>Luke<\/EM> a Sundance wannabe, waiting eagerly for Cineplex exposure.<\/FONT><\/P><br \/>\n<P>Time reads as space. <\/FONT><\/P><br \/>\n<P>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <IMG src=\"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/artopia\/images\/Hopper.jpg\" width=150><\/P><br \/>\n<P><FONT face=Arial size=1>Conner, <EM>Luke <\/EM>(Dennis Hooper as himself\/as Babalugats)<\/FONT><\/P><br \/>\n<P><BR><STRONG>Saint Luke<\/STRONG><\/FONT><\/P><br \/>\n<P>Of course, I immediately had to track down <EM>Cool Hand Luke<\/EM> to find the exact scene depicted in Conner&#8217;s film. It&#8217;s the road-gang shoveling race. Fresh tar needs to be covered with sand and smiley Luke inspires an insane speed-up. <\/FONT><\/P><br \/>\n<P>I don&#8217;t know if you&#8217;ve seen <EM>Cool Hand Luke<\/EM> lately. Hopper has a small part, but somehow, as a young man, looks better, more real, than the blindingly but conventionally handsome Newman. Current taste prefers a far less smirky Newman replete with macho wrinkles. And George Kennedy, as Luke&#8217;s friend and eventual Judas, is&#8230;George Kennedy.<\/FONT><\/P><br \/>\n<P>The movie is now unbearably arch.<\/FONT><\/P><br \/>\n<P>Newman plays a decorated vet incarcerated for &#8220;cutting off the heads of parking meters,&#8221; becomes a hero to the chain-gang boys, who spend a lot of time bare-chested, lounging around in their bunk beds. He&#8217;s a hero because, against all odds, he keeps escaping from the chain-gang. He gets caught and escapes over and over again.<\/FONT><\/P><br \/>\n<P>After the shoveling race, in what has to the nadir of the buddy-movie gone wrong, Kennedy says to Newman: &#8220;Oh, Luke, you wild, beautiful thing.&#8221; It still makes me giggle. In my set, that was the preferred tag-line, rather than the widely appropriated &#8220;What we got here is a failure to communicate.&#8221;<\/FONT><\/P><br \/>\n<P>If you look at <EM>Cool Hand Luke<\/EM>, do as I did. Fast-forward it so it becomes a digitally created silent-movie in color and Panavision. You won&#8217;t miss the dialogue, the acting, the sappy music. You can still follow the plot, such as it is. Is it a parable or shaggy-dog story? You tell me. And, if you must, you can freeze-frame all those banal bunk-bed tableaux. <\/FONT><\/P><br \/>\n<P>Moral: How a movie is made is more interesting than how most movies end up. <\/FONT><\/P><br \/>\n<P>Conner&#8217;s <EM>Luke<\/EM> shows this. It takes a lot of workers, and a lot of reflectors, behind the scenes to make a chain gang composed of actors in the sun look real or what passes for real &#8212; i.e. Hollywood Real. Conner&#8217;s analytical take on a shoot is itself a movie and therefore moves, albeit very, very slowly. One thing missing is the waiting around each take takes. Movie-making is boring; Conner makes that boredom interesting by slowing everything down as if he is searching for clues. Clues to what? Reality? Time? <\/FONT><\/P><br \/>\n<P>What you will notice when you see <EM>Luke <\/EM>will vary; its density is brilliant. Will it be a reflection in a puddle? The fleeting, over-the shoulder actor-smiles? Or, alas, only the beer-can opener on a chain around Lucas Jackson&#8217;s neck? That is Paul Newman, isn&#8217;t it?. And is that really Dennis Hopper? Or maybe you&#8217;ll fasten on that particular blue of someone&#8217;s screen-filling polo shirt; the Warner Bros. logo on the sound truck; or something really subtle like the aura of work as opposed to the aura of style.<\/FONT><\/P><br \/>\n<P><\/FONT><\/P><br \/>\n<P><STRONG>Note<\/STRONG>: In terms of last week&#8217;s column, several informants have offered the good news that there is a DVD tour of the Barnes collection listed on the foundation&#8217;s website. One correspondentremarks that at $35 it cost less than two adult visits to MoMA. Assuming this disc really does capture the ensembles, now all the foundation needs to do is make this record totally pan-and-zoom interactive and have it available for free online.<\/FONT><BR><\/P><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Bruce Conner: Luke&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Not Lukewarm You get beautiful blurred images, motion streaks, bare-chested male &#8220;zombies&#8221; shoveling dirt, moody music, behind-the-scenes views of a movie scene; nearly Muybridge-ian, almost dancelike motion-analysis of lumbering extras, key grips, gaffers, best boys, and script girls in jagged slow-motion; punctuating shots of empty canvas chairs and big reflectors; all [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-70","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-main","7":"entry"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/artopia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/artopia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/artopia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/artopia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/artopia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=70"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/artopia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/artopia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=70"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/artopia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=70"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/artopia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=70"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}