Recently by Yolanda Hippensteele, Media Democracy Fund

What a delight for a cultural policy geek like me to read all the brilliant discussion generated by this braintrust.


Among the thoughts I have swirling, many are constructive and complimentary.  But the most visceral (and perhaps the least constructive) is to shout "NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!" in response to Chris's post, which suggests we stop investing altogether in the goal of expanding involvement of the arts community in policy advocacy. 

All due respect to Chris, (and to Nathan, who I believe would agree with everything I'm about to say), that's a really bad idea.  

Consider the results If the arts and public interest community were to pull out of  the key cultural policy advocacy efforts of today.  No doubt we'd see disastrous effects as the media industries that lobby for deregulation would get their way, and arts appropriations for a politically inactive constituency would certainly be sliced.  We'd see:

Local music and film with no audience at all as monopoly owners block independents from radio and TV

Arts of all kind with no online audience as an Internet controlled by gatekeepers with the authority to censor blocks or or slows down whatever web sites the Internet providers don't like or whatever they find competitive with their own content offerings

Reductions in quality, quantity, and scale of independent artistic product as federal, state, and local funding for arts is cut

Abolition of arts programs in public schools when the policy mandates to keep them in curricula disappear

Disappearance of rural and low-income communities from the arts as public subsidies (and Internet connections) that once brought them to traditional and online arts spaces fade away

And the list goes on....

The simple fact is that there are lobbyists working smart and hard on behalf of telecom/cable industry supremacy and on behalf of budget-slashing and, in general, on the other side of every issue we care about.  So if arts and culture advocates aren't there to counter their arguments and remind policy makers of the constituency that supports creativity and cultural expression, well... we'll loose most of what we've gained so far in the past decades through policy advocacy as well as other efforts in cultural/market/technology change.  

Sure, advocacy is hard work.  Sure, there are challenges.  But crying "it's too hard" doesn't feel like a good reason to just hand our nation's communications infrastructure over to the control of profit-hungry industries.

Chris makes the point -- with which I whole-heartedly agree -- that artists and the arts sector can best employ their talents at working to change social norms and social architecture, and that resources would be well-spent on creative work to change the way lawmakers or the public think about cultural policy.  

Nobody is suggesting that we should force every painter and breakdancer and sitar player and web developer to abandon their craft in order to spend the rest of their years walking the marbled halls of Congress in a three-piece suit (Though Helen's post is great to read.)  What we're suggesting is that artists, arts administrators and culture lovers should be made aware of how policy decisions impact their lives, and they should be encouraged and assisted in lending their voices (or paintbrushes, or sitars) in those debates, either directly with decision makers or in public opinion, in whichever ways are most strategic for their role. 

At their best, these education and advocacy efforts rely on the work of organizers, communicators and policy wonks to track laws & regulations, distill them into layperson's terms, create messages, educate and organize their arts & audience constituencies.  And at their best, those efforts require resources to pay people to do the work.  While Chris may argue that " the arts community is in no real condition today to affect the outcomes of current policy making," I'd argue that it's a chicken-and-egg problem.  Without adequate funding, arts and public interest advocacy groups don't have the staff time to develop creative expressions about cultural policy, train cultural workers in advocacy tactics, engage their audiences, create strategic alliances, and all the other tactics that would increase their efficacy in shaping policy and public opinion.  

The type of sweeping policy and cultural change we'd all like to see is possible through strategic, creative work over a long period by many individuals, grassroots and national organizations working in coordination.  We just need a bigger arsenal. These days, we're sending our heroic advocates to battle heavy artillery with slingshots and paperclips.  (The Media Democracy Fund, a foundation collaborative supporting many of these efforts, can unfortunately attest).

I'd love to see what kind of seismic shifts the arts and public interest sectors could do around cultural policy if given the resources --and the encouragement -- to really give it a try.  

For sure, regulations and legislation ain't the only way to bring about change.  But they are far from inconsequential.  We should be talking about these strategies as Both/And propositions, not Either/Or.  

July 21, 2010 6:26 PM | | Comments (1) |
Bill and others on this thread are correct that it's critical to have collective bodies aggregating the concerns of artists on issues like copyright, IP, open Internet protections,  Internet accessibility, broadcast censorship, broadcast media ownership, etc. Bill mentioned in his earlier post that there are some advocacy groups "nibbling away" at these issues. 

While I can't agree more that this field must be larger, stronger, and better resourced, we'd do an injustice to neglect to acknowledge the heroic work of this savvy field of public interest advocates, lawyers and organizers who spend their days fighting for fairness in our media system. 

National organizations like the Future of Music Coalition, Public Knowledge, Center for Media Justice, Media Access Project and Free Press do brave battle on behalf of artists, audiences, nonprofit organizations and citizens against an extraordinarily powerful telecommunications and media industry lobbies. Arts service organizations like Americans for the Arts, Fractured Atlas and the National Alliance for Media Arts and Culture are also beginning to prioritize advocacy agendas. 

While we can rightly describe the challenges of organizing and advocating around cultural policy (it's technocratic and unsexy, the targets are diffuse and opque, etc.), it is really a lack of resources more than a lack of strategy, interest, or passion that keeps this field from generating the level of awareness and strength of constituency needed to adequately represent the interest of the arts in these critical debates. 

It's not an overstatement to say that the future of arts, media and culture is riding on the work of a perilously under-resourced field.  Yet few philanthropists are informed or engaged in media policy, and even fewer are funding it. Can funders of the arts to make an additional investment in the advocacy efforts needed to promote creativity and culture in the digital era?

Ford Foundation president Luis Ubiñas, in a recent Chronicle of Philanthropy opinion, called on foundations of all kinds to promote Internet access alongside their normal funding areas.  While Ford's $50 million investment is significant, it is seed money rather than a solution.  The field needs and deserves much more support.
July 19, 2010 1:18 PM | | Comments (0) |


This Blog Arts and culture are a cornerstone of American society. But arts and culture workers are often left out of important policy conversations concerning technology and creative rights even though the outcomes will have a profound impact on our world. Is it benign neglect? Or did we... more

This blog is a project of... the Future of Music Coalition, the National Alliance for Art Media + Culture, Fractured Atlas, and more

Our Bloggers We have 22 bloggers taking part in this week's conversation. They are... more

Contact us: Click here to send us an email... more

Recent Comments

William Osborne commented on Blurry Lines and Cultural Norms: You answer your own questions here. When the performers are like something...

casey commented on In Defense of Policy Advocacy: Testify, Yolanda!...

William Osborne commented on RE: Policy Ain't the Only Way...: I enjoyed your tangential approach to the problems. “POPaganda,” “subverti...

Nathaniel james commented on Required Reading: Thanks for the vote of confidence and keeping the thread I started open....

William Osborne commented on It Can't Be Just About Artists: Perhaps the best funding systems are those that minimize the dichotomy betw...

kare Anderson commented on Moving from "Me" to "We": Elitism vs. Populism: In moving from me to we, for more ways to make culture participatory, explo...

Kevin Erickson, All-ages Movement Project commented on It Can't Be Just About Artists: Thanks for these reflections, Bill. When I read Arts Inc, I was repeatedly...

DaOneRadio commented on Required Reading: Thanks for creating this blog. I just found it and hope it continues to she...

Casey Rae-Hunter, Communications Director, Future of Music Coalition commented on Simplicity vs. Austerity: Well, I did study jazz for a number of years, but that's a fair assessment ...

Kevin Erickson commented on Simplicity vs. Austerity: Casey, given that we share an indie/punk background, what I'm hearing here ...

AJ Blogs

AJBlogCentral | rss

About Last Night
Terry Teachout on the arts in New York City
Artful Manager
Andrew Taylor on the business of arts & culture
blog riley
rock culture approximately
critical difference
Laura Collins-Hughes on arts, culture and coverage
Richard Kessler on arts education
Douglas McLennan's blog
Dog Days
Dalouge Smith advocates for the Arts
Art from the American Outback
lies like truth
Chloe Veltman on how culture will save the world
Life's a Pitch
For immediate release: the arts are marketable
Mind the Gap
No genre is the new genre
Performance Monkey
David Jays on theatre and dance
Plain English
Paul Levy measures the Angles
Real Clear Arts
Judith H. Dobrzynski on Culture
Rockwell Matters
John Rockwell on the arts
State of the Art
innovations and impediments in not-for-profit arts
Straight Up |
Jan Herman - arts, media & culture with 'tude

Foot in Mouth
Apollinaire Scherr talks about dance
Seeing Things
Tobi Tobias on dance et al...

Jazz Beyond Jazz
Howard Mandel's freelance Urban Improvisation
Focus on New Orleans. Jazz and Other Sounds
Doug Ramsey on Jazz and other matters...

Out There
Jeff Weinstein's Cultural Mixology
Serious Popcorn
Martha Bayles on Film...

classical music
Creative Destruction
Fresh ideas on building arts communities
The Future of Classical Music?
Greg Sandow performs a book-in-progress
Harvey Sachs on music, and various digressions
Bruce Brubaker on all things Piano
Kyle Gann on music after the fact
Greg Sandow on the future of Classical Music
Slipped Disc
Norman Lebrecht on Shifting Sound Worlds
The Unanswered Question
Joe Horowitz on music

Jerome Weeks on Books
Quick Study
Scott McLemee on books, ideas & trash-culture ephemera

Drama Queen
Wendy Rosenfield: covering drama, onstage and off

Aesthetic Grounds
Public Art, Public Space
Another Bouncing Ball
Regina Hackett takes her Art To Go
John Perreault's art diary
Lee Rosenbaum's Cultural Commentary