{"id":547,"date":"2004-09-03T08:33:04","date_gmt":"2004-09-03T15:33:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/artfulmanager\/wp\/2004\/09\/more_on_the_value_of_art\/"},"modified":"2004-09-03T08:33:04","modified_gmt":"2004-09-03T15:33:04","slug":"more_on_the_value_of_art","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/artfulmanager\/main\/more_on_the_value_of_art.php","title":{"rendered":"More on the value of art"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Russell Smith has some <a href=\"http:\/\/www.theglobeandmail.com\/servlet\/ArticleNews\/TPStory\/LAC\/20040902\/RUSSELL02\/TPEntertainment\/TopStories\">great musings on the value of art<\/a> in the <i>Globe and Mail<\/i>. His thoughts are launched by the recent theft from the Munch Museum in Oslo. &#8216;The Scream,&#8217; specifically, has no market value (since it can&#8217;t really be sold), has no bragging value, since any collector that has it can&#8217;t show it publicly, and hasn&#8217;t been put up for ransom. Says Smith:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><i>Objects only have monetary worth because we say they do, and, more importantly, both sides of a transaction must agree that they do: Paper money is the clearest example of this consensual symbolism, since it has no intrinsic value. It is a contract. But then nothing really does have intrinsic value &#8212; even gold is more valuable than silver only because we have agreed to say that it is.<\/p>\n<p>\nRarity increases value only because of convention. A rare stamp can be worth thousands, even though it is useless, not necessarily beautiful and made of paper, simply because it benefits both seller and buyer to imagine it as a vessel for value &#8212; rather like a bank note. And the value assigned to it is the result of a negotiation that is fundamentally arbitrary.<br \/>\n<\/i><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>\nSo value is a social construct, which we always knew. But the keys to understanding that construction seem essential to any manager or steward of cultural artifacts or expressions.<\/p>\n<p>\nIn a comic twist on the same story and subject, <i>The Onion<\/i> parody newspaper recently offered the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.theonion.com\/nib\/index.php?issue_id=401&#038;nib=2\">following news brief<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><i><b><br \/>\n&#8216;The Scream&#8217; Poster Stolen from Area Dorm Room<\/b><br \/>\nST. PAUL, MN\u2039Concordia University campus police are still investigating Tuesday&#8217;s theft of a poster of Edvard Munch&#8217;s The Scream from an area dorm room. &#8216;We&#8217;re doing everything in our power to recover the poster,&#8217; officer Donald Benson said of the poster, which was stolen while the two residents of 204 Walther Hall were studying in the second-floor common area. &#8216;With its iconic contorted human figure beneath a swirling red sky, The Scream is a masterpiece of German expressionism, and the poster was valued at $7.95.&#8217; The work of art is one of only 86 copies known to exist on the campus.<br \/>\n<\/i><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Russell Smith has some great musings on the value of art in the Globe and Mail. His thoughts are launched by the recent theft from the Munch Museum in Oslo. &#8216;The Scream,&#8217; specifically, has no market value (since it can&#8217;t really be sold), has no bragging value, since any collector that has it can&#8217;t show [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-547","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-main","7":"entry"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/artfulmanager\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/547","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/artfulmanager\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/artfulmanager\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/artfulmanager\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/artfulmanager\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=547"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/artfulmanager\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/547\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/artfulmanager\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=547"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/artfulmanager\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=547"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/artfulmanager\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=547"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}