{"id":401,"date":"2003-11-24T08:24:56","date_gmt":"2003-11-24T16:24:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/artfulmanager\/wp\/2003\/11\/selling_the_grim\/"},"modified":"2003-11-24T08:24:56","modified_gmt":"2003-11-24T16:24:56","slug":"selling_the_grim","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/artfulmanager\/main\/selling_the_grim.php","title":{"rendered":"Selling the Grim"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Sunday NY Times piece on <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2003\/11\/23\/movies\/23JAME.html\">how Hollywood sells grim and depressing movies to a mass audience<\/a> felt like deja-vu all over again. In a nutshell, the article explored the challenge of selling difficult movies with a potential for larger audiences:<\/p>\n<p><div class=\"blogquote\">\nFor moviegoers, dark films raise a basic question: Why subject yourself to death, devastation and anguish when you can see &#8220;Elf&#8221; instead? That is the kind of question marketers hate to see in print. For them the issue is: How can you entice viewers to an emotionally grueling movie, short of handing out anti-depressants at the door?\n<\/div>\n<p>\nThe short answer, according to the specialists quoted in the article, is smoke and mirrors. Never say &#8216;grim&#8217; and &#8216;depressing&#8217;, but focus on &#8216;mystery&#8217; and &#8216;intrigue&#8217;. Push the news angle about the film&#8217;s author, or emphasize the Grammy potential of the acting. The ideal combo is to allow a dark but hazy sense of something bad happening, and then garner the positive reviews, news buzz, and water-cooler chatter to get a larger audience to pay for the downer experience.<\/p>\n<p>\nThe deja-vu comes from recent weblogs, exploring <a href=\"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/artfulmanager\/weblog_20031101.php#59174\">the challenge of <i>Nutcracker<\/i> ballet productions across the country<\/a>, in competition with the Rockettes&#8217; holiday spectacular stage show. Said one ballet company artistic director:<\/p>\n<p><div class=\"blogquote\">\n&#8216;What we have to do, sadly, is advertise our show as a great spectacle, a great show, and great family entertainment&#8230;We will not use the word ballet.&#8217;\n<\/div>\n<p>\nThe wordplay also recalls <a href=\"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/aboutlastnight\/archives20030720.shtml#45562\">posts on Terry Teachout&#8217;s blog<\/a> about why we don&#8217;t call certain musical\/theatrical works &#8216;operas,&#8217; but rather &#8216;musicals&#8217; or &#8216;serious chamber musicals&#8217;. The answer, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/sandow\/archives20030720.shtml#46056\">as other blogger Greg Sandow suggested<\/a>, is that composers would like to be paid, would like their works performed more than once, and fewer people will buy a ticket to an opera than a musical.<\/p>\n<p>\nIt&#8217;s all a matter of semantics, of course, but that&#8217;s what marketing is. It just seems that somewhere in the spin and wordplay, we may eventually lose sight of the actual selling proposition of non-mainstream cultural experiences&#8230;they are rarified, clarified experiences of the highest calibre of human expression. That&#8217;s worth a few bucks, I think.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Sunday NY Times piece on how Hollywood sells grim and depressing movies to a mass audience felt like deja-vu all over again. In a nutshell, the article explored the challenge of selling difficult movies with a potential for larger audiences: For moviegoers, dark films raise a basic question: Why subject yourself to death, devastation [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-401","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-main","7":"entry"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/artfulmanager\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/401","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/artfulmanager\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/artfulmanager\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/artfulmanager\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/artfulmanager\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=401"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/artfulmanager\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/401\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/artfulmanager\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=401"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/artfulmanager\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=401"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/artfulmanager\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=401"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}