{"id":2549,"date":"2014-02-19T12:55:03","date_gmt":"2014-02-19T17:55:03","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/artfulmanager\/?p=2549"},"modified":"2014-02-21T13:00:06","modified_gmt":"2014-02-21T18:00:06","slug":"the-components-of-risk","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/artfulmanager\/main\/the-components-of-risk.php","title":{"rendered":"The components of risk"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;ve been in a lot of arts discussions lately that wander around the question of risk. Most have been about risk-taking in audiences or communities. Some have been about risk tolerance and philanthropy. In these conversations, our language suggests that risk is a single variable, and that the individual is the best unit of analysis (a person is generically either risk-averse, risk-tolerant, or risk-seeking). But that increasingly feels like an inelegant and unproductive path.<!--more--><\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_2550\" style=\"width: 210px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/deetrak\/617101620\/\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-2550\" class=\"size-full wp-image-2550\" alt=\"Crevasse\" src=\"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/artfulmanager\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/02\/crevasse.jpg\" width=\"200\" height=\"200\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/artfulmanager\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/02\/crevasse.jpg 200w, https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/artfulmanager\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/02\/crevasse-150x150.jpg 150w, https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/artfulmanager\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/02\/crevasse-100x100.jpg 100w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 200px) 100vw, 200px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-2550\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Flickr user Didrik Johnck<\/p><\/div>\n<p>Rather than being a personal trait that is somehow encoded within us, &#8216;risk&#8217; feels more to me like an intersection of several different perceptions. Risk relates to our <em>confidence<\/em> about an outcome to a situation or experience (aka, our predictive ability or uncertainty). It also relates to our perceived <em>capacity<\/em> to bridge the uncertainty (which informs our confidence, but also has unique dynamics). And it involves our expectation of <em>consequence<\/em> &#8212; either for successfully bridging the distance, or for falling short. Each of these aspects includes an internal and environmental assessment. So our assessment and reaction to &#8216;risk&#8217; can change as we change, and as our situation changes.<\/p>\n<p>You could think of <em>confidence<\/em> as the distance to be leaped (the farther the jump, the less we can predict what&#8217;s on the other side), of <em>capacity<\/em> as our perceived ability to jump and the resources available to help us jump successfully, and of <em>consequence<\/em> as the depth of the chasm between us and the other side (measured against the pleasure awaiting us if we make it).<\/p>\n<p>The word &#8216;risk&#8217; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.oxforddictionaries.com\/definition\/english\/risk\">comes from the French word for &#8216;danger.&#8217;<\/a> But even &#8216;danger&#8217; is a context- and person-specific noun. Lighting a match on an open beach isn&#8217;t as dangerous as lighting it in a hay-barn near a leaking propane tank. And your <em>capacity<\/em> to light a match without dropping it or burning your fingers also informs the danger or risk. Finally your <em>confidence<\/em> about predicting the outcome of dragging the match across a rough surface in that environment rounds the circle.<\/p>\n<p>So, if you&#8217;re seeking to inform risk tolerance or risk response &#8212; of audiences, artists, funders, board members, administrators, civic leaders, and such &#8212; you&#8217;ve got multiple variables to manage and probably multiple problems to solve. Let&#8217;s explore the variables in a bit more detail:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><em>Confidence<\/em><br \/>\nHere I mean certainty about predicted outcomes, not the &#8216;can-do&#8217; quality of self-help books or <a href=\"http:\/\/www.rnh.com\/videos.html?video=109&amp;gallery=170&amp;vpg=7\">Sound of Music songs<\/a>. Our brains, as it turns out, are <a href=\"http:\/\/serendip.brynmawr.edu\/exchange\/node\/2604\">rather sophisticated &#8216;prediction machines,&#8217;<\/a> constantly guessing about the next moment, or the trajectory of various variables in space and time. Most of this we do subconsciously, so we&#8217;re not aware of how much we&#8217;re doing. Our ability to correctly predict outcomes depends quite a bit on our experience in certain situations or domains. A professional baseball player can make a good guess of the speed and location of a pitch as it&#8217;s leaving the pitcher&#8217;s hand. A novice will have no clue. Predictive ability also connects to our innate or developed abilities, or even <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Theory_of_multiple_intelligences\">our multiple intelligences<\/a>. That same professional baseball player may be a complete wreck when navigating a complex social situation or cocktail reception.<\/li>\n<li><em>Capacity<\/em><br \/>\nOur perceived capacity to engage an unknown or a potential danger also has multiple parts. It involves our assessment of our own ability, but also our assessment of the environment (Is there someone to help me? Will I be caught on the other side? Do I see tools available to increase my chance of success? Have other people like me made it?).<\/li>\n<li><em>Consequence<\/em><br \/>\nThis variable is a combination of the upside of success (pleasure, reward, return) and the downside of failure (death, disappointment, social ridicule, financial loss). If you are considering a long jump to a nice reward (ice cream on the other side), it matters whether there&#8217;s a small indent between the lines, or a 100-foot-deep crevasse. If you don&#8217;t like ice cream (what&#8217;s wrong with you?), there&#8217;s no need to make the jump at all. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ted.com\/talks\/clay_shirky_on_institutions_versus_collaboration.html\">Clay Shirky offers a great perspective on two approaches to avoiding bad consequences<\/a>, institutions often reduce the <em>possibility<\/em> of failure (by vetting and filtering early on), collaborative forms reduce the <em>cost<\/em> of failure (by making space for lots of experiments of small consequence).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>If these variables are useful, then an arts organization has many paths to fostering different risk responses in audiences, artists, administrators, and others. We can influence the <em>confidence<\/em> or predictive capacity through experience, exposition, and expression. We can influence <em>capacity<\/em> by offering tools, resources, and human support for those eager to explore the unknown. We can influence <em>consequence<\/em> by defining and delivering the upside more effectively, and mediating the downside.<\/p>\n<p>Finally, we can open our approach to recognize that <em>people<\/em>, by themselves, are not risk averse or risk seeking (although they may have tendencies or propensities). Rather, risk is a product of people in context in time.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;ve been in a lot of arts discussions lately that wander around the question of risk. Most have been about risk-taking in audiences or communities. Some have been about risk tolerance and philanthropy. In these conversations, our language suggests that risk is a single variable, and that the individual is the best unit of analysis [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":2550,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-2549","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-main","8":"entry"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/artfulmanager\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2549","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/artfulmanager\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/artfulmanager\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/artfulmanager\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/artfulmanager\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2549"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/artfulmanager\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2549\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/artfulmanager\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2550"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/artfulmanager\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2549"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/artfulmanager\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2549"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/artfulmanager\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2549"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}