{"id":1151,"date":"2008-04-03T09:12:27","date_gmt":"2008-04-03T16:12:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/artfulmanager\/wp\/2008\/04\/businesslike_is_not_the_proble\/"},"modified":"2008-04-03T09:12:27","modified_gmt":"2008-04-03T16:12:27","slug":"businesslike_is_not_the_proble","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/artfulmanager\/main\/businesslike_is_not_the_proble.php","title":{"rendered":"&#8221;Business-like&#8221; is not the problem"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Justin Macdonnell offers up <a href=\"http:\/\/www.smh.com.au\/news\/arts\/businesslike-arts-a-failure-says-entrepreneur\/2008\/04\/02\/1206851005398.html\">the latest salvo<\/a> in the perennial push-back against &#8221;business&#8221; thinking in arts and culture organizations. It&#8217;s a topic that lives at the center of my working life (directing, as I do, an <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bolzcenter.org\/\">MBA degree in arts administration<\/a>). And it&#8217;s a question to which I continually try to bring clarity, nuance, and honest reflection (some here on my weblog, some to myself).<\/p>\n<p>My thumbnail perspective on the intersection of artistic endeavor and &#8221;business&#8221; thinking is in this <a href=\"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/artfulmanager\/main\/008768.php\">short opinion piece from 2006<\/a>. And the question lies dead-center in the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/artfulmanager\/about\/index.php\">call to arms<\/a> that launched this blog.<\/p>\n<p>To be fair, my access to Macdonnell&#8217;s perspective is filtered through the journalist&#8217;s lens, which can tend to flatten the complexity and heighten the contrast of any opinion. But his basic premise &#8212; to rebel against &#8221;business-like&#8221; behavior and emphasis by governing boards &#8212; is a frequent battle cry by those frustrated with the current state of the arts.<\/p>\n<p>If nonprofits select board members who are unqualified for the complexity and depth of governance, they suffer for it. Those board members&#8217; day job as business person, social scientist, artist, civic leader, philanthropist, or anything else isn&#8217;t the <i>cause<\/i> of their inability to govern effectively. The process by which we find them, invite them, engage them, and frame and support their work is the cause.<\/p>\n<p>Nor is the problem a shortcoming of a particular &#8221;way of knowing&#8221; the world that a board member might bring &#8212; be it business practice, or academic research, or creative expression, or the like. <i>All<\/i> ways of seeing, choosing, moving, and evaluating can bring great value to cultural governance, as long as they are informed by humility, curiosity, commitment, and flexibility, and a willingness to adapt to the particular needs and vision of the organizational mission.<\/p>\n<p>Certainly, the blind faith in business-focused leadership on governing boards has done damage to cultural organizations &#8212; as have the wealth-focused or task-focused or status-focused board selection processes that emphasize broad categories or types or roles over individual competence and fit.<\/p>\n<p>At the end of the day, every day, arts organizations must be more business-like, more civic-like, more innovative-like, more creative-like, more connected-like, and more expressive-like than they were the day before. It might be time to put away the straw man in a business suit, and focus on finding, fostering, and connecting the real and complicated people who can advance our important work.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Justin Macdonnell offers up the latest salvo in the perennial push-back against &#8221;business&#8221; thinking in arts and culture organizations. It&#8217;s a topic that lives at the center of my working life (directing, as I do, an MBA degree in arts administration). And it&#8217;s a question to which I continually try to bring clarity, nuance, and [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-1151","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-main","7":"entry"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/artfulmanager\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1151","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/artfulmanager\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/artfulmanager\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/artfulmanager\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/artfulmanager\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1151"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/artfulmanager\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1151\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/artfulmanager\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1151"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/artfulmanager\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1151"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/artfulmanager\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1151"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}