{"id":938,"date":"2009-08-20T09:24:52","date_gmt":"2009-08-20T16:24:52","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/anotherbb\/wp\/2009\/08\/apollinaire_scherr_responds\/"},"modified":"2009-08-20T09:24:52","modified_gmt":"2009-08-20T16:24:52","slug":"apollinaire_scherr_responds","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/anotherbb\/2009\/08\/apollinaire_scherr_responds.html","title":{"rendered":"Apollinaire Scherr responds"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Dance critic <a href=\"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/foot\/\">Apollinaire Scherr<\/a> responds to my criticism (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/anotherbb\/2009\/08\/links---the-highlow-gap-in-dan.html\">here<\/a>) of dance criticism:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>In defense of Macaulay and me, a couple of thoughts: I do think there&#8217;s<br \/>\na difference between Croce&#8217;s not going at all (though if it were the<br \/>\ntime and I had the time, I would defend that action, given her reasons)<br \/>\nand Macaulay not watching the bulk of these two dance competition<br \/>\nshows. <\/p>\n<p>Don&#8217;t TV critics, even, review a show after having watched only<br \/>\nthe pilot and a few shows in? I don&#8217;t think a critic is obliged to<br \/>\nwatch every show to weigh in on the gist of it. Of course there are<br \/>\ngoing to be exceptions to the general rule of terrible choreography<br \/>\nthat makes even good dancers dreadful, but that&#8217;s not his or my point.<br \/>\nAnd haven&#8217;t you walked into a gallery, given a good look at a few<br \/>\npaintings\/installations\/videos and then scanned the rest? I mean, do<br \/>\nyou study every single inch of canvass to give it the benefit of the<br \/>\ndoubt? <\/p>\n<p>I think Macaulay is very careful, in all of his reviews, to<br \/>\nreport exactly how much he has seen and not seen. Probably other<br \/>\ncritics wouldn&#8217;t even mention it if they hadn&#8217;t seen every single show.<\/p>\n<p>As for the whole high\/low distinction, I agree that dance critics&#8211;or<br \/>\nrather, ballet critics&#8211;can be snobs. On the other hand, we&#8217;ve reached<br \/>\na point in the culture where to condemn a popular and populist art is<br \/>\nsuspect from the get-go. I think it&#8217;s refreshing, not tiresome, that he<br \/>\nwould dare do it in the Times. <\/p>\n<p>Also, how often do art critics even<br \/>\nbother with this kind of commercial work: say, Thomas Kinkade? Let me<br \/>\nknow what you think when they do. Sure, Dave Hickey has done Rockwell,<br \/>\nbut that&#8217;s so far after the fact, it hardly counts. <\/p>\n<p>Finally, this video<br \/>\nabove: I agree he&#8217;s a fine dancer&#8211;particularly his hips and<br \/>\nfootwork&#8211;but the choreography and the way it works with its music<br \/>\ndoesn&#8217;t allow him to be musical. Every one of his phrases ends with the<br \/>\nsame sort of ta-da, and the feel of the music runs exactly counter to<br \/>\nthe spirit of the dancing. It&#8217;s a ludicrous piece, and that&#8217;s the<br \/>\nproblem with <i>So You Think You Can Dance <\/i>&#8211;the show reduces even the<br \/>\nbest dancers to dreck. ~Apollinaire<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Dance critic Apollinaire Scherr responds to my criticism (here) of dance criticism: In defense of Macaulay and me, a couple of thoughts: I do think there&#8217;s a difference between Croce&#8217;s not going at all (though if it were the time and I had the time, I would defend that action, given her reasons) and Macaulay [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-938","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-uncategorized","7":"entry"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/anotherbb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/938","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/anotherbb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/anotherbb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/anotherbb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/anotherbb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=938"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/anotherbb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/938\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/anotherbb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=938"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/anotherbb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=938"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/anotherbb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=938"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}