{"id":622,"date":"2009-06-01T04:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-06-01T11:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/anotherbb\/wp\/2009\/06\/monday_links_are_art_students\/"},"modified":"2009-06-01T04:00:00","modified_gmt":"2009-06-01T11:00:00","slug":"monday_links_are_art_students","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/anotherbb\/2009\/06\/monday_links_are_art_students.html","title":{"rendered":"Monday links (Are art students stupid?)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><b>Oh, the horror.<\/b> Judith H. Dobrzynski on her AJ blog, <i>Real Clear Arts<\/i>, lamented the following:&nbsp; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/realcleararts\/2009\/05\/looking-at-paintings.html\"><i>Who&#8217;s Looking at Paintings? Not, Apparently, Even Art Students<\/i>.<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Dobrznyski:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>This<br \/>\nentry is about art students who won&#8217;t go to art museums. Apparently,<br \/>\nsome students today think that viewing art online is good enough or<br \/>\nbetter. That&#8217;s what I discovered reading a blog item by Laurie<br \/>\nFendrich, a painter who lives and works in New York and is a professor<br \/>\nof fine arts at Hofstra University.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Dobrznski didn&#8217;t link to the Fendrich story; <a href=\"http:\/\/chronicle.com\/review\/brainstorm\/fendrich\/\">here<\/a> it is. (Fendrich doesn&#8217;t appear to link to her sources either.)<\/p>\n<p>Fendrich:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Yesterday a colleague who teaches painting emailed me that it&#8217;s hard<br \/>\nfor him to get his students to go to a museum to look at a work of art.<br \/>\nThey just can&#8217;t see the point. Why schlep into New York to go to a<br \/>\nmuseum to see a painting, especially since, as often as not, the<br \/>\nhyper-bright, clean crisp image of it that&#8217;s posted on the museum&#8217;s Web<br \/>\nsite makes the real thing look limp and lame by comparison?<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>They&#8217;re<br \/>\nboth missing a salient point understood by the students. A lot of art<br \/>\ntoday is about the replication of imagery. Its aura, in the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/The_Work_of_Art_in_the_Age_of_Mechanical_Reproduction\">Walter Benjamin<\/a> sense, is not lost in mechanical reproduction. It exists <i>because<\/i> of mechanical reproduction.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/portrait.pulitzerarts.org\/cube-gallery\/sherman\/\">Michael Kimmelman<\/a> learned this when he asked <a href=\"http:\/\/images.google.com\/images?q=cindy+sherman&amp;oe=utf-8&amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;client=firefox-a&amp;um=1&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;ei=ZYwjSo-aCKG6sgPNzciIBA&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=image_result_group&amp;resnum=4&amp;ct=title\">Cindy Sherman<\/a> to visit the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.metmuseum.org\/\">Met<\/a> with him in 1996, as part of a NYT portrait series he turned into a <a href=\"http:\/\/search.barnesandnoble.com\/Portraits\/Michael-Kimmelman\/e\/9780679452195\">book<\/a>.<br \/>\nShe told him she rarely went to the Met. She was in fact surprised that<br \/>\npaintings have a different kind of life in person than they do in<br \/>\ncatalogs, where she&#8217;s used to seeing them. She claimed not to have<br \/>\npreviously noticed this elementary (Watson) fact. She didn&#8217;t notice<br \/>\nbecause she doesn&#8217;t need it. That&#8217;s not what her work is about. <\/p>\n<p>Sherman To Kimmelman on the history of her medium (art historians, avert your eyes):<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>I&#8217;m illiterate in the historical, classic knowledge of photography, the<br \/>\nstuff teachers attempted to bore into my head, which I resisted. The<br \/>\nway I&#8217;ve always tried to cull information from older art and put it<br \/>\ninto my work is that I view it all anonymously, on a visceral level.<br \/>\nLately I&#8217;ve been looking at a lot of images from Surrealism and Dada,<br \/>\nbut I never remember which ones are the Man Rays, say, because I&#8217;m just<br \/>\nlooking for what interests me.<\/p>\n<p><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Some<br \/>\nartists don&#8217;t go to museums until their own work is there, and some,<br \/>\nlike Sherman, tend not to go even then. This is neither shocking nor<br \/>\ncause for hand-wringing.<\/p>\n<p><b>Bruce Barcott<\/b> on a disgraceful name enshrined in honor at the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.seattleartmuseum.org\/\">Seattle Art Museum<\/a>, in <i><a href=\"http:\/\/cityartsmagazine.com\/seattle\/issues\/CAS069\/CAS069_barcott.html\">City Arts Seattle<\/a><\/i>:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>My daughter and I were strolling through the Seattle Art Museum<br \/>\nrecently, enjoying the treasures in the museum&#8217;s still-feels-new<br \/>\nexpansion wing, when I turned a corner and saw these words: &#8220;Kerry<br \/>\n&amp; Linda Killinger Gallery.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>I stood there, gobsmacked.<\/p>\n<p>The Killinger Gallery: I&#8217;d never noticed it before. Donor names on<br \/>\ngallery walls and theatre seats are so ubiquitous that they rarely<br \/>\nregister. But this one popped up as if lit up in Dan Flavin neon. Here<br \/>\nwas Seattle&#8217;s culpability in the global economic crisis laid bare. Here<br \/>\nwas our shame displayed.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><b><br \/><a href=\"http:\/\/www.lawrimoreproject.com\/lp\/Artists\/Pages\/Susan_Robb.html\">Susan Robb<\/a>:<\/b> Her <i>Warmth, Giant Black Toobs<\/i> is in Houston. The able Douglas Britt has the story, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.chron.com\/disp\/story.mpl\/ent\/arts\/theater\/6443206.html\">here<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image\" style=\"display: inline;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/anotherbb\/assets_c\/2009\/05\/toobs-7225.html\" onclick=\"window.open('http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/anotherbb\/assets_c\/2009\/05\/toobs-7225.html','popup','width=400,height=300,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/anotherbb\/assets_c\/2009\/05\/toobs-thumb-300x225-7225.jpg\" alt=\"toobs.jpg\" class=\"mt-image-center\" style=\"margin: 0pt auto 20px; text-align: center; display: block;\" width=\"300\" height=\"225\" \/><\/a><\/span><b>From <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bladediary.com\/flyerplanterboxes\/\">Blade Diary<\/a> via <a href=\"http:\/\/eyeteeth.blogspot.com\/\">Eyeteeth<\/a><\/b>: What to do with abandoned newspaper boxes:<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image\" style=\"display: inline;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/anotherbb\/assets_c\/2009\/05\/newspaperbox-7243.html\" onclick=\"window.open('http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/anotherbb\/assets_c\/2009\/05\/newspaperbox-7243.html','popup','width=500,height=666,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/anotherbb\/assets_c\/2009\/05\/newspaperbox-thumb-300x399-7243.jpg\" alt=\"newspaperbox.jpg\" class=\"mt-image-center\" style=\"margin: 0pt auto 20px; text-align: center; display: block;\" width=\"300\" height=\"399\" \/><\/a><\/span><b>Finally<\/b>, <a href=\"http:\/\/images.google.com\/images?q=ellsworth+kelly&amp;sourceid=navclient-ff&amp;rlz=1B3GGGL_enUS283US285&amp;um=1&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;ei=cI4jSovNC6WwtAPen6CFBA&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=image_result_group&amp;resnum=1&amp;ct=title\">Ellsworth Kelly<\/a> (<a href=\"http:\/\/greg.org\/archive\/2009\/05\/21\/dress_1952_by_ellsworth_kelly.html\">the dress<\/a>) from Greg.org and Ellsworth Kelly (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.sfgate.com\/cgi-bin\/article.cgi?f=\/c\/a\/2009\/05\/10\/PKAU17C8TF.DTL\">the interview<\/a>) from Kenneth Baker. Ellsworth Kelly now, Ellsworth Kelly forever.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Oh, the horror. Judith H. Dobrzynski on her AJ blog, Real Clear Arts, lamented the following:&nbsp; Who&#8217;s Looking at Paintings? Not, Apparently, Even Art Students. Dobrznyski: This entry is about art students who won&#8217;t go to art museums. Apparently, some students today think that viewing art online is good enough or better. That&#8217;s what I [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-622","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-uncategorized","7":"entry"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/anotherbb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/622","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/anotherbb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/anotherbb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/anotherbb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/anotherbb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=622"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/anotherbb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/622\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/anotherbb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=622"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/anotherbb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=622"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/anotherbb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=622"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}