{"id":1457,"date":"2010-01-15T20:28:58","date_gmt":"2010-01-16T04:28:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/anotherbb\/wp\/2010\/01\/galleries_look_at_their_narrow\/"},"modified":"2010-01-15T20:28:58","modified_gmt":"2010-01-16T04:28:58","slug":"galleries_look_at_their_narrow","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/anotherbb\/2010\/01\/galleries_look_at_their_narrow.html","title":{"rendered":"Galleries look at their narrowing options"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Artists come and go from galleries all the time. Usually, it&#8217;s the<br \/>\nformer dropping the latter. Artists either get<br \/>\nbetter opportunities or they just can&#8217;t stand to work with their<br \/>\ndealers a minute longer.<\/p>\n<p>Gallerists drop artists too, most<br \/>\nfrequently because the artists prove unreliable. They miss exhibition<br \/>\ndates and leave the dealer hanging, sell their work on the side in<br \/>\nviolation of an agreement or trash talk the dealer on a regular basis.<br \/>\nIf a dealer is found chained to a radiator after an S&amp;M session<br \/>\nthat went badly, he won&#8217;t look kindly on his own artists spreading the<br \/>\nword.<\/p>\n<p>Dealers may feel certain artists have failed to evolve. When <a href=\"http:\/\/www.seattlepi.com\/visualart\/233718_lindafarris.html\">Linda Farris<\/a><br \/>\nfound herself in the position of representing too many artists whom she<br \/>\nfelt had not delivered on their early promise, one of the top reasons<br \/>\nshe closed her gallery was to avoid cleaning house. She loved all the<br \/>\nartists in her lineup but didn&#8217;t necessarily love what their work had<br \/>\nbecome.<\/p>\n<p>Closing for that reason is rare. Also rare is for<br \/>\ndealers to drop an artist for sales reasons if they continue to<br \/>\nappreciate the product. Bruce Nauman sold badly until fairly recently.<br \/>\nA dealer who let him go due to a paltry economic return (and I don&#8217;t<br \/>\nknow of one) would be covered in shame. If dealers think a particular<br \/>\nartist is top of the line, they hang in through the thin hoping to help<br \/>\ncreate the thick. <\/p>\n<p>On the other hand, if the artist&#8217;s rise proves<br \/>\nmeteoric, the loyal dealer might well be dumped in favor of one who couldn&#8217;t have cared less during the lean years. That&#8217;s a painful payoff, intolerable in other business<br \/>\ncontexts, but gallerists are more than business people. They can never<br \/>\nbe great if they keep both eyes on the bottom line. <\/p>\n<p>Enter the<br \/>\nrecession. Solid artists sell little or nothing. Trade that was once<br \/>\nbrisk has slowed to a trickle. Unless dealers have a trust fund or<br \/>\nrepresent at least a couple of recession-proof cash cows, the price of<br \/>\nmounting shows they couldn&#8217;t have sold in flush times becomes more of a<br \/>\nmental burden.<\/p>\n<p>Case in point: Seattle gallerist <a href=\"http:\/\/www.jamesharrisgallery.com\/\">James Harris<\/a> recently dropped <a href=\"http:\/\/glennrudolph.com\/glennrudolph\/home.html\">Glenn Rudolph<\/a>. In terms of Northwest art, it&#8217;s similar to a New York dealer dropping Nauman twenty years ago. <\/p>\n<p>Rudolph is a poet of the post-apocalypse. He likes to photograph<br \/>\nbad news once the news value has faded and people are making the best<br \/>\nof their diminished circumstances. He favors those who live it up on<br \/>\nthe margins of society, in a bizarre social club (the Duct Tape<br \/>\nWarriors in the Kent Valley), the artificial splendor of a suburban<br \/>\nhousing development (Kent, again) and his own neighborhood in North<br \/>\nSeattle.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" alt=\"glennrudolphcherry.jpg\" src=\"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/anotherbb\/glennrudolphcherry.jpg\" class=\"mt-image-center\" style=\"margin: 0pt auto 20px; text-align: center; display: block;\" height=\"404\" width=\"409\" \/><\/p>\n<p><!--more--><br \/>\nHe photographs along the train routes from Portland to<br \/>\nVancouver and finds landscapes that are more like abandoned still<br \/>\nlifes, nature damaged by human folly.<br \/>\nOther photographers make dirges from such material, but Rudolph&#8217;s<br \/>\nversion of the down-and-out has a resilient edge, a zany comeback<br \/>\nquality, an exuberance that belies the facts.<\/p>\n<p>When Lisa Corrin was leaving the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.seattleartmuseum.org\/\">Seattle Art Museum<\/a>,<br \/>\nwhere she&#8217;d served as modern\/contemporary curator, she said Rudolph had<br \/>\ntaken her by surprise. In the age of global communications, she thought<br \/>\nit would be almost impossible for a major artist to fly under the<br \/>\nradar. After seeing Rudolph&#8217;s work, she realized it isn&#8217;t true.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Glenn<br \/>\nRudolph is enormously under-recognized. He deals with the subcultures<br \/>\nthat inhabit the Northwest and how the region&#8217;s social landscape is<br \/>\nchanging the natural one. (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.seattlepi.com\/visualart\/235703_lisacorrin09.html\">more<\/a>)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Harris said the economy is the only reason he parted company from<br \/>\nRudolph. <\/p>\n<blockquote><p>I<br \/>\ntruly believe in Glenn&#8217;s work. He is a Seattle treasure and his<br \/>\nphotographs captures a NW sensibility like no one else. I wish I could<br \/>\nafford him the time and the backing that he deserves. If you look at<br \/>\nhis gelatin silver prints, both large and small scale you can see the<br \/>\nmastery in his printing technique. What a wonderful way to capture the<br \/>\nfantastic shades of gray of the NW. Unfortunately, it is too hard to do<br \/>\nshows and not make money, not only for me for for him. I feel honored<br \/>\nto have worked with him.&nbsp; <\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Also missing from the gallery Web site is <a href=\"http:\/\/www.jamesharrisgallery.com\/artists\/Patrick%20Holderfield\/holderfield.html\">Patrick Holderfield<\/a>, but that omission may be temporary. Holderfield appears to be taking a vacation from making art. His personal <a href=\"http:\/\/www.pholderfield.com\/\">Web site<\/a><br \/>\nno longer carries any of his work. If offers instead two words: NOW<br \/>\nWHAT? If Holderfield answers his own question with new work, Harris<br \/>\nsaid he&#8217;d be happy to return him to the fold, assuming he&#8217;d want to<br \/>\nreturn.<\/p>\n<p>Prior<br \/>\nto the recession, Harris would have given an artist of Holderfield&#8217;s<br \/>\nstature time to find a new direction. No longer. Behind the sleek<br \/>\nexterior of many important galleries around the country, there&#8217;s a<br \/>\ndesperate scramble going on. Although some critics claim a recession<br \/>\nfrees the art world from concentrating on money, I think the reverse is<br \/>\ntrue for galleries. Money buys time and funds the experimental. In its<br \/>\nabsence, the bottom line becomes the determining factor. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Artists come and go from galleries all the time. Usually, it&#8217;s the former dropping the latter. Artists either get better opportunities or they just can&#8217;t stand to work with their dealers a minute longer. Gallerists drop artists too, most frequently because the artists prove unreliable. They miss exhibition dates and leave the dealer hanging, sell [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-1457","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-uncategorized","7":"entry"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/anotherbb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1457","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/anotherbb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/anotherbb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/anotherbb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/anotherbb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1457"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/anotherbb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1457\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/anotherbb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1457"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/anotherbb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1457"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/anotherbb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1457"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}