Fending off the battering rams

To define classical music as a 'museum culture' is to insist that it is, and always was, dead. A museum holds those relics of cultures past that have avoided oblivion through some combination of value, infamy, and luck. These objects did not establish their cultural significance by being put in a museum; they were put in a museum because they are culturally significant. So it is with classical music. One cannot sift out the ephemera except in retrospect, and enforcing this false barrier between 'classical music' and contemporary music is the best way to ensure that nothing arising out of the classical music tradition will ever again be relevant to a culture.

From here, Beethoven quickly becomes as foreign to us as Josquin, until the entire tradition is nothing more than an intricate curiosity of the distant past, with a few tunes such as the Ode to Joy and Eine Kleine Nachtmusik joining London Bridge and Greensleeves as apocryphal cultural continuities through the centuries.

Defining classical music in such a way is an unnecessary act of euthanasia. If one is so inclined, why bother worrying about it? But it isn't the only way.

Hip-hop is not just some monolithic unimaginative corporate ephemera that is threatening to push the mausoleum of classical music into irrelevance. It too has roots, traditions, influences, innovations, and appropriations. I'm sure that if you looked a little harder, you'd find 'ouds, string quartets, reimaginings of the Kreutzer sonata, not to mention jinghus, tablas, Baudelaire poems, and even Josquin inside the world of hip-hop; and behind these things, artists who truly believe that their work will one day be a famous relic--a part of a future 'museum culture'. In order to be a relic tomorrow, though, one must be relevant today, and so one must evolve.

Indeed, it's not that classical music is alone being urged to reform, but that classical music alone insists that it need not.

NL responds:
Very interesting argument. But can someone show me a government initiative anywhere that is demanding reforms in traditional folk music, or jazz, or any other form. As far as I can tell, classics are the only genre under such pressure, mostly due to a perverse form of counter-elitist ploitical correctness.

This has been going on for a long time: Pop people claim that all music should sound exactly like their music, and then they bash classical music for being "narrow" and "elite." What they're really saying is they resent classical music being different from the music they like to hear, but they have to couch it as the opposite sentiment in order to appear liberal and open-minded.