Why Didn't Denver Take Design Show?

As my recent review of the "European Design Since 1985" exhibition at the Indianapolis Art Museum indicated, it is exactly the kind of show serious museums should be doing. It's ambitious, it's rooted in scholarship, it's aesthetically interesting, and it's displayed well.

So it's more than a little curious that the Denver Art Museum (below), where the curator R. Craig  Miller worked until late 2007, and where he had organized two previous, widely traveled design shows, is not taking this one. DAM built its $110 million Hamilton wing in part to allow it to exhibit more traveling shows. In the catalogue's foreward, DAM director Lewis I. Sharpe and IMA director Maxwell Anderson call the show a collaboration and note that many people at both museums worked hard on it. 

DAM Hamilton_Bldg-Martin_Plaza.jpgWhen I was in Indianapolis, I asked Miller what happened. He told me that Denver would only take the show if he cut it to 100 objects, out of the 250 in his version -- a move that would, obviously, destroy its intent as a survey show. The Denver museum, he said, did not view his show as a big draw.

In Denver, the pressure to get people in the door has indeed been intense. Before its new wing opened in October, 2006, the museum talked of drawing 1 million visitors a year. By the following March, Sharp had lowered his sights, but was still telling me that he expected 750,000 visitors at DAM during the Hamilton wing's first year.

Sharp also said "now we are into more ambitious shows and special-event programming." The wing's namesake, board chairman Frederic C. Hamilton, told me: "The question is how [the museum] functions down the road, and that depends on good programming, and I think we'll do well with attendance because we have a helluva program." Hamilton made Sharp stay in his job past his intended retirement "so we have a good product to sell."

I always thought the attendance goal (even revised downward) was a pipedream for DAM -- and in fact the museum hasn't come close to achieving either one. In fiscal 2007 (ending Sept. 30), the visitor total was 629,000; in fiscal 2008, 608,000; in the first six months of this fiscal year, 226,000.

DAM spokeswoman Andrea Fulton says the decision not to show "European Design Since Bonnie_MacLean-Yardbirds.jpg1985" had nothing to do with these dynamics. She says 1) they wanted their new design curator, Darrin Alfred, to develop his own vision for the department, and 2) DAM acquired a large trove of posters in late 2007 and Alfred has spent his time organizing a show of them. It's now on view -- "The Psychedelic Experience, Rock Posters from the San Francisco Bay Area, 1965-71" (right).

During all the expansions of the last 20 years, many have feared that programming would shift away from art and toward more popular shows just to attract visitors. Rock posters aren't as bad as exhibits that have filled the galleries of major museums (Star Wars, anyone?). But why DAM would waste its investment in the design show -- a model -- is beyond me.  

"European Design Since 1985" will travel to the High Museum in Atlanta and, with luck, other venues to be announced, including one in Europe.

Photo Credits: Jeff Wells, Courtesy Denver Art Museum (top); Bonnie MacLain, Yardbirds, Doors, Fillmore Auditorium, San Francisco, 1967 © Bill Graham Archives, LLC. (bottom).      

April 27, 2009 10:30 PM | | Comments (2) |

2 Comments

DAM made a huge mistake by not taking this show. I can't imagine a more ambitious show than Miller's "European Design since 1985" that DAM has or will launch. The Hopkins Family Quilts and Charles Russell (both on display in 2009) will not do much to help project a more forward thinking vision for Denver. Rock Posters? Come on! Perhaps attendance would rise if the museum hosted exhibits like Miller's and not the schlock shows scheduled for this year. The best thing at DAM is the reinstall by Christophe Heinrich of the modern and contemporary collection focused on the figure!

Thanks for this post. I haven't heard much about it here (Denver), but it could be my fault in not keeping up. It's a shame we'll miss this show! I would have much preferred it to the rock posters. I imagine the decision had much to do with budgeting and is one of the hard choices a museum makes when money isn't pouring in and staff positions are being cut. It's just far less expensive to show the collection than to truck a big 3-D exhibit in. I'm sure a lot of this is going on around the country.

Leave a comment

About

Real Clear Arts This blog is about culture in America as seen through my lens, which is informed and colored by years of reporting not only on the arts and humanities, but also on business, philanthropy, science, government and other subjects... more

Judith H. Dobrzynski Now an independent journalist, I've worked as a reporter in the culture and business sections of The New York Times, and been the editor of the Sunday business section and deputy business editor there... more

Want to be notified of new posts? Send an email to RealClearArts@gmail.com. more

Contact me Click here to send me an email... more

Archives

Archives: 306 entries and counting

Blogroll

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Real Clear Arts published on April 27, 2009 10:30 PM.

Possible Solution For That Infamous YSL Sale of Chinese Artifacts? was the previous entry in this blog.

Future World: What Happens When Arts Coverage Is Left to Bloggers? is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

AJ Ads


AJ Blogs

AJBlogCentral | rss

culture
About Last Night
Terry Teachout on the arts in New York City
Artful Manager
Andrew Taylor on the business of arts & culture
blog riley
rock culture approximately
critical difference
Laura Collins-Hughes on arts, culture and coverage
Dewey21C
Richard Kessler on arts education
diacritical
Douglas McLennan's blog
Dog Days
Dalouge Smith advocates for the Arts
Flyover
Art from the American Outback
Life's a Pitch
For immediate release: the arts are marketable
Mind the Gap
No genre is the new genre
Performance Monkey
David Jays on theatre and dance
Plain English
Paul Levy measures the Angles
Real Clear Arts
Judith H. Dobrzynski on Culture
Rockwell Matters
John Rockwell on the arts
Straight Up |
Jan Herman - arts, media & culture with 'tude

dance
Foot in Mouth
Apollinaire Scherr talks about dance
Seeing Things
Tobi Tobias on dance et al...

jazz
Jazz Beyond Jazz
Howard Mandel's freelance Urban Improvisation
ListenGood
Focus on New Orleans. Jazz and Other Sounds
Rifftides
Doug Ramsey on Jazz and other matters...

media
Out There
Jeff Weinstein's Cultural Mixology
Serious Popcorn
Martha Bayles on Film...

classical music
Creative Destruction
Fresh ideas on building arts communities
The Future of Classical Music?
Greg Sandow performs a book-in-progress
On the Record
Exploring Orchestras w/ Henry Fogel
Overflow
Harvey Sachs on music, and various digressions
PianoMorphosis
Bruce Brubaker on all things Piano
PostClassic
Kyle Gann on music after the fact
Sandow
Greg Sandow on the future of Classical Music
Slipped Disc
Norman Lebrecht on Shifting Sound Worlds

publishing
book/daddy
Jerome Weeks on Books
Quick Study
Scott McLemee on books, ideas & trash-culture ephemera

theatre
Drama Queen
Wendy Rosenfield: covering drama, onstage and off
lies like truth
Chloe Veltman on how culture will save the world

visual
Aesthetic Grounds
Public Art, Public Space
Another Bouncing Ball
Regina Hackett takes her Art To Go
Artopia
John Perreault's art diary
CultureGrrl
Lee Rosenbaum's Cultural Commentary
Modern Art Notes
Tyler Green's modern & contemporary art blog
Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.