Jim Fixed It - Celebrity Culture Rules

The current scandal in Britain is about how a dead paedophiliac appears to have been protected and event abetted in his crimes by his employer. The trouble is that the employer in question was the second most revered institution (after the monarchy) in the country, the BBC. The nature of the complaint against the BBC is not clear, except that it failed to follow up and transmit "Newsnight's" posthumous exposé of Jimmy Savile's assaults on under-aged girls and boys, which were actually facilitated by the BBC and in some cases took place on BBC premises.

         Was it a cover-up? Did the BBC top brass know Savile was a paedophile?




Of course they did. Not only was it common knowledge here (just as it was common knowledge that Andy Coulson and Rebekah Brooks were pond life), but Louis Theroux had raised the question with Savile himself on a TV programme that was transmitted, and the scarecrow look-alike, cigar-chomping DJ made it clear that he would see anyone who alleged this in court with a great big action for libel.

         The BBC paid this repulsive clown so much that he could not only afford a white Rolls Royce, but also the very best libel lawyers.

         The airwaves and newspapers are full of the Savile story, but few have noticed what made it possible for this under-educated, not obviously intelligent, ill-spoken, probably smelly creep to gain access to schools for disturbed children, children's hospitals and wards, and even Broadmoor, Britain's secure hospital for the mentally-ill. Yes, Savile raised a good deal of money for several charities. But what made this possible?  He was, apparently, as talent-free as he was free of scruples.

         The answer is that he was a product of our Celebrity Culture. This celebrates people for no reason except that they have become well known. Paris Hilton, Katie Price and Kim Karsdashian's names spring immediately to mind as examples of celebrity syndrome. They're all female, but there are plenty of males besides the late Jimmy - though most of them have some vestigial claim upon our attention, such as being able to play football well. And, of course, none of them has criminal sexual tastes. But Jimmy's fame was drawn from the same poisoned well.

         In some cases, such as "Jim'll Fix It," his TV programmes actually gave him access to his victims. Again, why did the BBC give him these programmes? The only possible answer is: because he was famous.

         Until we as a society stop celebrating those of us who have little or nothing to offer to the rest of us, those who can contribute nothing to civilization but an ability to kick a ball, or a large and imposing bust or wardrobe, we'll continue to connive in the exploitation of the vulnerable.

         While we apply the thumbscrews to BBC manager and executives to force them to tell us exactly when they knew Savile was having his wicked way with kids, we are ignoring the underlying evil of celebrity-chic. In the meantime a few religious maniacs are worried about grown-up men and women getting married to other grown-up men and women (who just happen to be of the same gender). 

         Oh, and a candidate is running for the Presidency of the US, who believes that god lives on a planet called Kolob and that Jesus visited America not all that long ago. Would Romney, I wonder, be mounting his challenge to the sanity of the American electorate if we were not all obsessed by empty celebrity?

October 24, 2012 12:12 PM | | Comments (0)

Leave a comment


About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Plain English published on October 24, 2012 12:12 PM.

Confessions of a soap addict was the previous entry in this blog.

Is there a Foodie Backlash? is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

AJ Ads

AJ Blogs

AJBlogCentral | rss

About Last Night
Terry Teachout on the arts in New York City
Artful Manager
Andrew Taylor on the business of arts & culture
blog riley
rock culture approximately
critical difference
Laura Collins-Hughes on arts, culture and coverage
Richard Kessler on arts education
Douglas McLennan's blog
Dog Days
Dalouge Smith advocates for the Arts
Art from the American Outback
lies like truth
Chloe Veltman on how culture will save the world
Life's a Pitch
For immediate release: the arts are marketable
Mind the Gap
No genre is the new genre
Performance Monkey
David Jays on theatre and dance
Plain English
Paul Levy measures the Angles
Real Clear Arts
Judith H. Dobrzynski on Culture
Rockwell Matters
John Rockwell on the arts
State of the Art
innovations and impediments in not-for-profit arts
Straight Up |
Jan Herman - arts, media & culture with 'tude

Foot in Mouth
Apollinaire Scherr talks about dance
Seeing Things
Tobi Tobias on dance et al...

Jazz Beyond Jazz
Howard Mandel's freelance Urban Improvisation
Focus on New Orleans. Jazz and Other Sounds
Doug Ramsey on Jazz and other matters...

Out There
Jeff Weinstein's Cultural Mixology
Serious Popcorn
Martha Bayles on Film...

classical music
Creative Destruction
Fresh ideas on building arts communities
The Future of Classical Music?
Greg Sandow performs a book-in-progress
Harvey Sachs on music, and various digressions
Bruce Brubaker on all things Piano
Kyle Gann on music after the fact
Greg Sandow on the future of Classical Music
Slipped Disc
Norman Lebrecht on Shifting Sound Worlds
The Unanswered Question
Joe Horowitz on music

Jerome Weeks on Books
Quick Study
Scott McLemee on books, ideas & trash-culture ephemera

Drama Queen
Wendy Rosenfield: covering drama, onstage and off

Aesthetic Grounds
Public Art, Public Space
Another Bouncing Ball
Regina Hackett takes her Art To Go
John Perreault's art diary
Lee Rosenbaum's Cultural Commentary
Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.