Confessions of a soap addict

I am an EastEnders addict. Anybody reading this who doesn't have access to BBC television will probably be at a loss to understand this reference to the long-running TV soap opera, which takes place in "Albert Square," a fictional postal address in London's East End. I, like millions of other middle-class Brits (though I'm only half Brit, and that by dint of passport only, not birth), go slumming in Albert Square four times each week for a half hour starting at 7.30 or 8.0.

        And I mean "slumming." The whole point of the series is that the highest moral type you encounter in EE is the lovable rogue. Otherwise the dramatis personae consist of an entire catalogue of villainy, from Falstaffian slightly bent to Iago-like pure evil. There are no virtuous women living in Albert Square, and no honest men. Even the children, though charming, are adept at calculating the odds.


Janine Butcher

Why do we like it so much that we weep at the very idea of missing an installment of this weekly brew of nastiness?  The obvious answer, that it's the best-written, best-directed thing on TV, isn't the whole story. It's true that the dialogue is so up-to-the-minute that it doesn't simply reflect non-Received Pronunciation speech (the accent is not really the Cockney implied by the location, so much as it is the Estuary English now spoken by nearly all uneducated Londoners - and by a great many educated ones as well). In some cases, I'd claim, EE actually sets the linguistic trends.

         I met some of the writers a dozen or more years ago in - of all places - Almaty in Kazakhstan. (It's a long story, but they were there to help found the Kazakh TV industry.)  Many of them were upper-middle class public-school (or equivalent) educated kids from professional families living somewhere like Hampstead; but my god, did they have acute ears. They were true professionals, also, in the sense of being able to anticipate the next social problem that would affect those beneath them - way beneath them, as they were better paid than I was - on the socio-economic ladder. Whether it was single motherhood, abortion, gay schoolboys, obesity or baby-snatching - the EE writers were there before the broadsheet papers even noticed there was a problem. Governments could have done worse than use them as consultant forecasters.

         As for the directors - these vary from programme to programme and week to week, as do the writers. But they all have in common the breathless speed with which the cuts proceed in each episode. Remark on something to someone watching with you, and you've missed the next vital cue. Watching EE demands such mental agility that I'd argue that it improves the viewer's reasoning powers, maybe even increases your IQ. It certainly does wonders for your grasp of social issues; and by making the sufferers characters that you care about, gives you a certain sympathy with people that likes of whom you - the comfortable, middle-class viewer with a university degree - will probably never encounter in real life.

         Of course I should hasten to add here that the colossal viewing figures for EastEnders couldn't possibly be made up exclusively of middle-class people. A good many viewers, perhaps a majority, might come from the traditional working-classes (if there are any of these left) and from the underclass, for whom a TV set is one of the rights of life.  (This is probably the place to say that I have an ancestral tie myself, if not to Albert Square, to the Whitechapel district of the East End, from where my maternal grandparents emigrated to the USA - though I don't actually know whether either of them was born in London. We still have plenty of family in London, although we've lost touch with them.)

         All this is by way of saying how much pleasure I got from this week's Diary in The Spectator. The genius who edits it has commissioned Steve John Shepherd, who plays the character of Michael Moon in EastEnders to write it today.  In his first paragraph he writes about an Asian man who recognises him in a branch of (the middle-class shop) Marks & Spencer, and calls him "a very naughty man." Says Mr Shepherd, his interlocutor obviously "enjoys the psychological torture my character EastEnders inflicts on people." Myself, I love Michael Moon - he's handsome, charming, and has married and had a child with the female Iago called Janine Butcher. So wicked is Janine that she became a Jewish convert in order to marry a rich man, whom she then murdered.  It's a brave fellow that takes on Janine, even if he is himself being transformed "into the devil's son." 

         I'm afraid I must have missed some of the episodes in which Michael's "diabolical stature" grew. I certainly did not catch the programme in which he was shown reading the Times Literary Supplement on a bench in Albert Square. I regret this omission more than I can say. I am very cross indeed with the TLS just at the moment, as they recently ran a cover piece on a book to do with food that was so incompetent that I felt bound to write a personal note of complaint to the Editor. I feel the piece did a great deal of damage to the fledgling academic field of food studies, and that it was unforgivable of the TLS to print such a foolish piece, let alone put it on the cover. If I hadn't been associated with the paper for about 40 years, both as reviewer and reader, I'd cancel my subscription. I wonder if that was the number of the TLS  Michael Moon was shown reading in Albert Square?


August 31, 2012 12:21 PM | | Comments (0)

Leave a comment


About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Plain English published on August 31, 2012 12:21 PM.

Tempest a wonderful shipwreck production was the previous entry in this blog.

Jim Fixed It - Celebrity Culture Rules is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

AJ Ads

AJ Blogs

AJBlogCentral | rss

About Last Night
Terry Teachout on the arts in New York City
Artful Manager
Andrew Taylor on the business of arts & culture
blog riley
rock culture approximately
critical difference
Laura Collins-Hughes on arts, culture and coverage
Richard Kessler on arts education
Douglas McLennan's blog
Dog Days
Dalouge Smith advocates for the Arts
Art from the American Outback
lies like truth
Chloe Veltman on how culture will save the world
Life's a Pitch
For immediate release: the arts are marketable
Mind the Gap
No genre is the new genre
Performance Monkey
David Jays on theatre and dance
Plain English
Paul Levy measures the Angles
Real Clear Arts
Judith H. Dobrzynski on Culture
Rockwell Matters
John Rockwell on the arts
State of the Art
innovations and impediments in not-for-profit arts
Straight Up |
Jan Herman - arts, media & culture with 'tude

Foot in Mouth
Apollinaire Scherr talks about dance
Seeing Things
Tobi Tobias on dance et al...

Jazz Beyond Jazz
Howard Mandel's freelance Urban Improvisation
Focus on New Orleans. Jazz and Other Sounds
Doug Ramsey on Jazz and other matters...

Out There
Jeff Weinstein's Cultural Mixology
Serious Popcorn
Martha Bayles on Film...

classical music
Creative Destruction
Fresh ideas on building arts communities
The Future of Classical Music?
Greg Sandow performs a book-in-progress
Harvey Sachs on music, and various digressions
Bruce Brubaker on all things Piano
Kyle Gann on music after the fact
Greg Sandow on the future of Classical Music
Slipped Disc
Norman Lebrecht on Shifting Sound Worlds
The Unanswered Question
Joe Horowitz on music

Jerome Weeks on Books
Quick Study
Scott McLemee on books, ideas & trash-culture ephemera

Drama Queen
Wendy Rosenfield: covering drama, onstage and off

Aesthetic Grounds
Public Art, Public Space
Another Bouncing Ball
Regina Hackett takes her Art To Go
John Perreault's art diary
Lee Rosenbaum's Cultural Commentary
Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.