Q&A with Rose board chair Jonathan Lee
MAN: Last week you said that you wanted to meet with the Brandeis board. Has that happened, will that happen?
Jonathan Lee: I sent the president of the university a letter [Monday] asking to meet with him, with his attorney, and any members of the Brandeis University board that he'd like to have at the meeting. I'd come with a small group of the Rose overseers. I doubt that will happen. My initial outreaches to the board itself have not borne any fruit. My expectation is that won't happen, but I'm making every good-faith effort to have such a meeting.
MAN: Do you have an endgame in mind for that meeting, a desired result? Or do you mostly want to chat and cajole?
JL: The issue that I have -- or that I perceive -- is that we share completely different reality sets. I'm sitting in a chair at the time this thing explodes as the chairman of the Rose of the board of overseers, so I have a duty and a responsibility to the collection and to the people who have given money to the museum. We have endowments and cash-on-hand for facility enhancements, and there is a museum that has been going since 1961. So I am representing those interests as loudly and as clearly as I can.
I come in as an art person and not first and foremost as a Brandeis person. I didn't go there. My mother was highly involved in the Rose and was, I think, the first chair of the board and had given a lot of pictures to this place as well as a gallery. I grew up going there and learning about art by her taking me there, so there's a long family connection and history.
So, with all that in mind, the endgame is to convince the trustees and the administration of the university that closing the art museum and selling the art is not in the interest of the university even though I appreciate that the university is in a dire financial time. I feel for the university. I am not anti-university, and I appreciate that the university's situation is difficult. I think that the solution does not lie with selling the art off. So I would love to get [Brandeis] motivated to develop a 'Plan B.'
Of course when they turn to me and say, 'What else should we do?' I'd say, 'I'm not on your university board of trustees and I'm not on your financial committee, and the things that I'd say off the top of my head that aren't well-founded you won't like. Such as: Stop building the buildings you're building. Stop rolling out things in your life sciences initiative for two or three years. But I'm on the outside. Obviously I'm not the most effective person to solve that problem.
But I do think that selling the art and closing the museum is extremely bad for the long-term health of the university. They say, 'Without selling the art we have no university.' And I say, 'If you sell art we have no university.' So I don't know who's correct, but my take on the art is this: The Rose is a cultural and an artistic legacy of post-World War II Jewry who got over the shock of Hitler and World War II and pulled themselves up and made money and became philanthropic and culturally-inclined, so they collected art, supported the university and gave it art. It's a beautiful legacy. It has an intellectual legacy beyond the art -- and the art here is the largest modern and contemporary collection in New England. This art has been loaned from the museum to all over the world. To me this is a world-class asset. Maybe I'm not subjective, but I categorize it as a world-class asset and I say protect your world-class asset, the kernel of the wheat, not the chaff.
This place is fundamental to a liberal art education. Louis Brandeis was very eloquent when he talks about this to his daughter, who was involved with the University of Louisville: One thing is you have to get books and start a library; and two you have to get art and start an art collection. He's very eloquent about what that means. [Image: Alexander Archipenko, Torso Nude Female Figure, Collection of the Rose Art Museum, dammit.]
MAN: You're looking at legacies from multiple positions: the past, the present and the future.
JL: Yes. The whole thing about art museum codes of conduct and codes of ethics -- Brandeis, they don't really care about museum codes of ethics. So that's why the first thing they said was that we won't be a museum anymore, we'll get around the codes of ethics by not being a museum.
My position is that you make a whole lot of current donors, past donors and much more importantly future donors really unhappy. It's a reputational hit that's hard to get over. It gets Jewish donors who are philanthropically-oriented... you give them a perfect excuse not to give Brandeis any money. What they're doing to the Rose is an easy out.
So yeah, I feel it's my job to try to protect this thing. Why do I want to see an artistic and cultural legacy busted up like some poor widow who is sending her jewelry [out] through a pawn shop to where it's ending up in Dubai and Russia?
Art History Newsletter
Art to Go
Culture Monster (LAT)
Eco Art Blog
Fallon & Rosof
Heart as Arena
Indy Museum of Art
Modern Art Obsession
Two Coats of Paint
Boston & New England
Midwest (KS --> OH)
New York City
Art on my Mind
Artists Unite Issue
The Brooklyn Days
High Low and in Between
I Heart Photograph
The Old Gold
Anne Sherwood Pundyk
Washington, DC, Baltimore
AJ BlogsAJBlogCentral | rss
Terry Teachout on the arts in New York City
Andrew Taylor on the business of arts & culture
rock culture approximately
Rebuilding Gulf Culture after Katrina
Richard Kessler on arts education
Douglas McLennan's blog
Art from the American Outback
For immediate release: the arts are marketable
No genre is the new genre
David Jays on theatre and dance
Paul Levy measures the Angles
John Rockwell on the arts
Jan Herman - arts, media & culture with 'tude
Apollinaire Scherr talks about dance
Tobi Tobias on dance et al...
Howard Mandel's freelance Urban Improvisation
Focus on New Orleans. Jazz and Other Sounds
Doug Ramsey on Jazz and other matters...
Jeff Weinstein's Cultural Mixology
Martha Bayles on Film...
Greg Sandow performs a book-in-progress
Exploring Orchestras w/ Henry Fogel
Harvey Sachs on music, and various digressions
Kyle Gann on music after the fact
Greg Sandow on the future of Classical Music
Norman Lebrecht on Shifting Sound Worlds
Jerome Weeks on Books
Scott McLemee on books, ideas & trash-culture ephemera
Wendy Rosenfield: covering drama, onstage and off
Chloe Veltman on how culture will save the world
Public Art, Public Space
John Perreault's art diary
Lee Rosenbaum's Cultural Commentary
Tyler Green's modern & contemporary art blog