I noticed these Jorge Posada/Mayor Bloomberg ads on The Awl
last Tuesday. "Did they press 'submit' on those ads the as soon as Posada
caught that last Rivera pitch on Monday night?" I wondered. Some deft Google work on my part determined that no, the ads had been running since the end of September, neatly timed with the release of Posada and Mrs. Posada's (err...sorry, Aliza) book. New York Magazine reports that jointly, the Posadae endorse our current Mayor--though poor Mrs. P. doesn't get her photo in the banner ads--saying in a press release, "He can hit, throw, field and lead a team, all without missing a beat.
We proudly pledge our support to the City's all-star Mayor, Mike
Bloomberg." Oh-boy. I have never worked in politics, but as a casual observer who thinks a lot about publicity, I don't think it's a good idea to have a player from only one New York sports team endorse you. Sure, the Mets were an unmitigated disaster this season, but that's hardly germane to their having many, many fans who are voters. I asked my friend Ben Wyskida, Publicity Director for The Nation (see the **exclusive** Life's a Pitch interview here) for his thoughts:
"The Yankees are Manhattan's team and Bloomberg is Manhattan's Mayor. I'm not sure what a Mets fan would think of this. Also, I wish these ads reminded voters what a horrific stadium deal Bloomberg cut with the Yankees, costing the city millions in revenue and leaving school children in the Bronx playing baseball on Staten Island, instead of on the new parkland they were promised. But they won't. Frankly, I do think in local politics it's good to get sports heroes involved, but you have to get a few, from the different teams."Moving on from Bloomberg's PR choices, I was thinking about how interesting it is every time a baseball player (orchestra player, ensemble member) is pulled out of their group into the solo spotlight. I don't think I've ever seen Posada on his own; Jeter, yes, all over the place, including in bobblehead form on my desk and in my dreams every night, but not Posada. I spent a good chunk of last week in Utah with my clients The King's Singers. Even when a new member joined the group last year, we didn't concentrate the press on him. Sure, he did a few interviews about "being the new King's Singer," but the focus was on how his joining would affect the group, what the group's process for selecting a new member was, what was ahead for this new incarnation of the group. Watching two of their concerts last week, I noticed that the individual members don't even bow after one has a solo. The soloist may gently nod slightly more than the other members during the applause, but even in performance the emphasis is completely on the group.
On the one hand, I think orchestras, baseball teams and ensembles are significantly more interesting to watch when you know the personalities and interests behind the players. One of the New York Philharmonic musicians, for example, was profiled in Runner's World because he is, you guessed it, a runner. Similarly, one of The King's Singers, Paul Phoenix, loves cars; would his being profiled in Car and Driver help the group reach a different audience? Of course. Would I, as the group's publicist, feel strange about pitching a solo profile of him without pitching solo profiles elsewhere for the other five? Absolutely. I felt weird typing his name just now! David Hurley, Timothy Wayne-Wright, Philip Lawson, Christopher Gabbitas and Stephen Connolly - there! Now I've mentioned them all.
I'm curious to hear how other publicists for organizations and ensembles handle this. Is it more effective to divide and conquer--that is, pitch stories for individuals when and where they come up--or to push a group's image and persons-alities above all else? Individuals are what make the groups, and basically everything in this world, interesting, but the group is what's powerful and, ultimately and presumably, what people want to see and hear. How much stronger would a Yankees endorsement of Bloomberg have been, for example, rather than just a Jorge Posada endorsement?
All that said, let's go Yankees! It is my opinion as a Public Relations Professional that winning the World Series in your new stadium will result in Good Publicity. That's a little free advice from me to you, Joe Girardi.]]>
Wouldn't it be fantastic if arts organizations did this? Normally, I would advocate for a consistent voice in marketing materials, but with Twitter, blogs and Facebook, personality is the name of the game, and why not own up to the fact that your organization is made up of a lot of different personalities? Having more than one person at an arts organization tweet each week would give the public a sense of the people behind the scenes in a far more natural way than a Q&A or a special feature on the website. It would also, as I'm sure it does in Wired's case, drive followers to their employees' personal Twitter pages, and assuming they're pro-their organization, that can only raise awareness beyond the organization's normal reach. Most importantly, it would allow an organization to have their news curated in a different way each week; maybe what the marketing director views as news is different from what the artistic administrator views as news, so why not embrace that and the diversified followers that come with it?
No one ever comments about "all that coke" on Life's a Pitch. Lame, team. Lame.
]]>
I
had this drink at the Dove Parlour in the West Village once that
supposedly had absinthe in it. Everything I know about absinthe I
learned from Moulin Rouge, so I sat on a barstool waiting for
Tinkerbell to fly out and summon me, all the while warning my friends
that I might start to act crazy. Posting the above Tweet was
basically the same: lots of devilish anticipation with zero result. At
least this didn't leave a nasty licorice taste in my mouth. After a
half hour I e mailed a contact at the Times and explained the Sondra situation, and a blurb was in Arts, Briefly on Monday. Who says e mail is dead? (Did everyone notice that was the Most E-mailed Story on the Wall Street Journal website for about two days?) 
Ever
so slightly more success! (Although not actual success, because Eric's
concert isn't getting reviewed.) No response on Twitter, but I did hear
from someone that no one would be reviewing the concert. But again,
that was via e mail about other work matters, not a dedicated response
to my Twitch. I didn't expect a dedicated response; I don't know what I
expected. Tinkerbell again, probably.