Misdirection

I was sitting in the last row of the orchestra at Alice Tully last night and, at one point during a performance, the woman to my left leaned back and loud-whispered to an usher, "There's someone taking pictures down there!", gesturing to her right dramatically. No sooner had the dutiful usher trotted off to investigate the situation did the woman to my left whip out her iPhone and take a photo herself.

Bold, madam.

[That would be seat Z104, if anyone from Lincoln Center is reading.]

During the final bows, my tricky left-neighbor took another iPhone photo, and this time, the usher told her to stop, so she first took the picture and then turned off the phone. If I were the usher, I might have said, "Ma'am, I'm gonna need to delete that photo..." and then mistakenly deleted her contacts. Simultaneously, the woman to my right busted out her camera equivalent of Zach Morris' cell phone and took a flash photo! The usher asked her to stop, at which point she implored, "But I'm a critic." and waved scribbled notes on her program in his face. (Keep in mind, this was all happening while the Chamber Music Society was playing.) I was going to point out that, as a Publicity Professional, I can safely say we were not in press seats, but I thought it best not to cause a scene while on the new hall's maiden voyage.

Call me a prude but I, not unlike Patti LuPone, do not like it when audience members take photos during performances. My real problem is that rules are rules; if I'm obeying them, you should be too. There's a music blogger in the city who constantly posts illegal concert photos on his blog; I'm sure he'll have a few posted from last night at Alice Tully soon enough. If I worked at a presenter who gave him press tickets, I would be infuriated by his lack of respect for the artists and the houses. I'm also the person who would have deleted the iPhone contacts, so perhaps I'm not the best acid test for such things.

On the train ride home, I found myself wondering why I was being so rigid. What is actually the problem with audience members taking non-flash photos at performances? Flashes distract performers, but iPhone/Blackberry/camera phone photos are very discreet: they're silent and flashless. A second potential problem is that the artists don't have approval of photos that are taken during concerts then posted who knows where, but shouldn't performers be thrilled that someone was enjoying the experience of them playing enough to want to preserve a memory of it?  We take photos when we like something, when we want to remember something or when we want to share our personal experiences with others. With that in mind, how can taking photos at concerts be against the rules? And if the photos end up on blogs or Flickr, or videos are posted on YouTube or Vimeo, what damage is done? If anything, a positive concert experience at your venue is being advertised. By prohibiting photos, presenters are essentially preventing audiences from doing the viral marketing leg-work for them.

I've personally been known to Photoshop my vacation photos, so I understand artists' fear of not having any semblance of approval of live concert photography. Perhaps one solution is providing a gallery of water-marked high-resolution photos from every concert taken by an in-house professional photographer, advertised in the program and available to all ticket-buyers. That way, if someone who may or may not be on the official press list wanted to blog about the concert the next day - or simply e mail a photo to a grandparent in Michigan - he or she could procure a great shot without having to ask the venue or artist's permission. The photos would be high-quality, and presumably the artist could approve or not approve them directly after the concert.

A second option is to allow photos and video during one piece only, be it the first piece on the program or the encore. The artist would know when he or she would be filmed/photographed, and could mentally prepare for it. This, of course, may prove to be a flawed system, but I have to believe if you give people a legal window to photograph, they'll be less inclined to break the rules during the rest of the concert.
February 23, 2009 10:40 AM | | Comments (4)

Categories:

4 Comments

Newspapers (while they still exist) regularly take live-performance photos, with the permission of the venue. Artists can't control how those photos look. The NY Times regularly prints unflattering (to put it mildly) photos of singers in live performance at the Met, leading me to wonder whether the people picking the photos to print at the Times think opera is silly, and find photos that make it look that way.

As one of the pioneers of classical music concert photography for blogging bombthrowing purposes, oh, about four years ago, I think it's time to come up with a few new rules:

1. Never take photos during a performance. It's annoying as hell to look at somebody else's shiny LCD instead of the stage during a performance.

2. Never use a flash. It's also as annoying as can be, and it doesn't help with your photo quality because the stage is usually lit up already.

3. If you do publish your photos on the internet, make sure they are flattering. If not, rethink what you're doing. There's enough ugliness in the world already.

Taking a photo during a live performance is antithetical to the whole purpose of the experience; that being an emphemeral shared group experience, unique and created soley for those souls who chose to join the artists for that evening.

Producers and venues are obliged to enforce the pact made with the artists to ensure that their performance is not pirated for purposes the artists have not agreed to.

My company and our venue routinely confiscate and delete any attempts to record, video, or photograph the event. That you found the ushers in at Tulley not doing the same shocks me.

Regarding the press, you overlook that many houses provide dress rehearsal passes and/or in-house photography of live performance prior to opening for use in any news services. There is no excuse for any member of the press to illegally take photos during performance. None. We extend the same opportunity and services to bloggers.

With regard to the idea of letting people record or photograph at some point in the performance. That'll fly when you let us all stand over your shoulder as you type, having disabled the backspace key.

Regarding the audio--this might work for individual artists but might not work for orchestras and similar unionized groups that operate under CBAs. Those that I've worked with include strict and specific language about what can and can't be recorded. Audience bootlegs are a big no-no, and management is beholden to police their patrons for this very reason.

But really, what's up with people who bootleg performances, post them on snarky blogs, and then use those recordings (usually of very poor quality) to issue sweeping critiques of the artist? This has always struck me as extremely unfair, though I can't argue with the free buzz. And on one level, I think it's cool that recording and blogging about a performance excerpt can get patrons more deeply engaged.

But at the same time, I can't argue with the musician/performer who gets defensive and uptight about having his work recorded. Those bootlegs have always felt a little bit like stealing to me. Most musicians' core business is LIVE performance, and their work is sort of undermined when it is taken out of context and out of their control. Besides, that performer is being paid for one service, licensing their work for one-time-use, as it were. I really think this comes down to artistic integrity and respect of the live performance.

I do think it's important that artists embrace being public figures. This is why I'd be all for photo sessions and limited, unobtrusive photography during performances. Let people hold on to the experience. But I do think the issue of audio or video is completely different...it gives patrons far more than they payed for, but cheapens the art in the process.

Leave a comment

About

Life's a Pitch Why don't we apply the successful marketing and publicity campaigns we see in our everyday lives to the performing arts? Great ideas are right there, ripe for the emulating. And who's responsible for the wide-reaching problems in ticket sales and audience development? Boring artists? Greedy managers? Overstretched marketing departments? We're beyond debating who owns the problem. Let's fix this thing.
more

Amanda Ameer left her position as Publicity Manager at IMG Artists in June 2007 to start First Chair Promotion. She currently represents Hilary Hahn, Gabriel Kahane, The King's Singers, David LangEric Owens, Michael Gordon, Hélène Grimaud, Sondra Radvanovsky and Julia Wolfe, and serves as a consultant to Chamber Music America.
more

Contact Click here to send an email. more

Subscribe to the Newsletter Fill in your email address here.
more

Twitter I gave in and answered the siren call of Twitter. Click the button to follow:

Twitter.jpg
more

Archives

Archives: 374 entries and counting

Sites

Now Play It
This site has musicians teaching viewers how to play their most popular songs on the guitar via downloadable video. more
MOMA - Eye on Europe
This microsite for one of MOMA's 2006 exhibitions is a(n extreme) lesson in what can be done digitally for special projects (world premieres?).
more
Spoon
This website makes me feel impossibly uncool, and I love it for that very reason.
more
The Metropolitan Opera
Sometimes, when the (performing arts) world gets me down, I go to The Met's website and feel better about it all.
more

Resources

RSS Feeds 
RSS is an acronym for "RDF Site Summary," or "Rich Site Summary."  RSS is a family of XML-based Web feed formats used to publish frequently updated content such as blog entries, news headlines, and podcasts in a standardized format. 
more
YouTube 
YouTube, created in 2005, is a free video sharing website where users can upload, view, and share video clips.  YouTube uses Adobe Flash technology to display a wide variety of user-generated video content, including movie clips, TV clips, and music videos, as well as amateur content such as videoblogging and short original videos.
more
Wikipedia 
Wikipedia, created in 2001, is a multilingual, web-based, free content encyclopedia project.  Wikipedia's articles provide links to guide the user to related pages with additional information.  Articles are written collaboratively by volunteers from all around the world.  Wikipedia is one of the largest reference sites on the internet, with at least 684 million people visiting the site yearly.  It contains more than ten million articles in more than 250 languages (over two million in English alone). 
more
MySpace 
MySpace, launched in 2004, is the largest social networking website in the United States.  A free-access website, MySpace allows anyone aged 14 and over to create a personal profile.  Unlike other social networking sites, MySpace allows users to personalize their profiles by entering HTML into certain areas on their pages, thus displaying video or flash content instead of text.  Users may also customize the colors, backgrounds, and fonts on their profiles through the use of CSS (cascading style sheets). more
Facebook 
Launched in 2004, Facebook is now the second largest social networking website in the United States (behind MySpace). The free-access website allows users to easily connect and interact with other people, and it is now also possible to create a Facebook profile for an artist, band, brand, or business. Users can add themselves as "fans" of an artist or business, write on an artist/business profile's "Wall," upload photos, and join other fans in discussion groups. more
more resources

AJ Ads



AJ Blogs

AJBlogCentral | rss

culture
About Last Night
Terry Teachout on the arts in New York City
Artful Manager
Andrew Taylor on the business of arts & culture
blog riley
rock culture approximately
critical difference
Laura Collins-Hughes on arts, culture and coverage
Dewey21C
Richard Kessler on arts education
diacritical
Douglas McLennan's blog
Dog Days
Dalouge Smith advocates for the Arts
Flyover
Art from the American Outback
Life's a Pitch
For immediate release: the arts are marketable
Mind the Gap
No genre is the new genre
Performance Monkey
David Jays on theatre and dance
Plain English
Paul Levy measures the Angles
Real Clear Arts
Judith H. Dobrzynski on Culture
Rockwell Matters
John Rockwell on the arts
Straight Up |
Jan Herman - arts, media & culture with 'tude

dance
Foot in Mouth
Apollinaire Scherr talks about dance
Seeing Things
Tobi Tobias on dance et al...

jazz
Jazz Beyond Jazz
Howard Mandel's freelance Urban Improvisation
ListenGood
Focus on New Orleans. Jazz and Other Sounds
Rifftides
Doug Ramsey on Jazz and other matters...

media
Out There
Jeff Weinstein's Cultural Mixology
Serious Popcorn
Martha Bayles on Film...

classical music
Creative Destruction
Fresh ideas on building arts communities
The Future of Classical Music?
Greg Sandow performs a book-in-progress
On the Record
Exploring Orchestras w/ Henry Fogel
Overflow
Harvey Sachs on music, and various digressions
PianoMorphosis
Bruce Brubaker on all things Piano
PostClassic
Kyle Gann on music after the fact
Sandow
Greg Sandow on the future of Classical Music
Slipped Disc
Norman Lebrecht on Shifting Sound Worlds

publishing
book/daddy
Jerome Weeks on Books
Quick Study
Scott McLemee on books, ideas & trash-culture ephemera

theatre
Drama Queen
Wendy Rosenfield: covering drama, onstage and off
lies like truth
Chloe Veltman on how culture will save the world

visual
Aesthetic Grounds
Public Art, Public Space
Another Bouncing Ball
Regina Hackett takes her Art To Go
Artopia
John Perreault's art diary
CultureGrrl
Lee Rosenbaum's Cultural Commentary
Modern Art Notes
Tyler Green's modern & contemporary art blog
Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.