Blog Posts v Articles

Often when I receive responses to posts I write, people refer to the texts as "articles." Which leads me to wonder whether the word "blog post" and "article" means the same same thing to most people who read material on the Internet. To me, there's a huge difference between what I post to ArtsJournal / chloeveltman.com and the content that magazines and newspapers commission me to write. For one thing, it usually takes me an hour or less to create and publish a blog post, whereas an article can take weeks or even months to research and write. For another, I'm the only "editor" involved in the blogging process, whereas whenever I write a piece for a magazine or newspaper, a whole team of editors, sub-editors and other media people often gets involved. For a third, I pretty much write whatever I want on my blog, whereas to have something published elsewhere involves getting past various gatekeepers.

All of the above differences affect both the content and style of what I write. As such, it feels a bit strange when people writing to me about my blog posts refer to them as "articles." To play devil's advocate for a moment: If readers are genuinely unable to distininguish between a quick, visceral response to the world, and something more detailed and well-thought-out, then is it worth spending all the time and effort writing articles at all?

I'm pretty sure I'm over-intellectualizing this. It's probably just a matter of semantics. Perhaps it's too much to expect readers outside the journalistic process to separate the term "article" from "blog post." The line between the two concepts is blurred after all -- some bloggers do undertake lots of research for their blog postings and agonize over every word. Equally, newspapers and magazines publish many articles that are poorly written and researched.

To me, however, the terms are far from interchangeable. A blog post is all about getting new ideas and news out there in a timely or spontaneous fashion to kick-start conversations. The writing should be as clear and stylish as possible under the the quick turnaround timeframe that goes hand in hand with posting five days a week. And of course facts should be accurate. But beyond a perfuctory breaking news report, an an article is something that one could think of as growing out of a blog post -- a piece of work that involves more long, hard thinking, in-depth and/or wide-ranging interviews and perspectives, and a refined style.

Perhaps one day when blogs become the absolute heart of cultural journalism -- and, dare I say it, when economics make it possible for bloggers to devote themselves 100% to creating content for their blogs -- it may be possible to conflate the terms. For now however, the two terms remain separated in my practice and mind.
May 11, 2008 12:28 PM | | Comments (4)

4 Comments

Hi Cinque
Just checked out your blog. It's beautiful. You've been at this game much longer than I have and I'm grateful to hear your thoughts. Like you, I often use my blog as a space to try out ideas for full-length articles. On occasion, editors have even commissioned me to write articles based on blog posts they came across while browsing the Web or my site. I try not to agonize too much over blog posts though as I write one every day (except at the weekends) and like the idea of the form as being more spontaneous than what might appear in a regular media venue. I personally don't distinguish between the blogs that appear on the New York Times' or Wired's websites. The fact that the blog posts have these big media outlets to back them up gives them instant credibility it's true. But we all know that the people who are writing these posts are overworked journalists trying to squeeze blogging in in between reporting stuff for the magazines and newspapers. I'd be surprised if they were getting paid anything extra to blog. This puts them on the same playing field, in my opinion, as many other serious bloggers.
Chloe

Sasha
Thanks for your valuable comments. I think a day comes in every blogger's life when he or she realizes that people are actually reading their blogposts. For most people, this is a moment of triumph mixed with trepidation. With the latter feeling -- a kind of mini-shock -- comes the sensation that one can't just slap whatever one wants up on the Internet and that everything that a blogger writes has consequences, like it or not. Regardless of that, the most important thing for any blogger who wants to be taken seriously is to combine accuracy with stylistic flair. Obviously, with the time constraints involved, this can be tricky. I try as hard as I can to double-check my facts, and write as beautifully as I can. But sometimes, no matter how hard I try, I don't quite get there. I do my best, certainly. And to play safe, because I don't often get time to do original reporting on blog posts, I often include lines like "according to such such in the New York Times..." or "several people have told me that..."
Needles to say, the form is in its infancy and we are all still feeling our way.
Chloe

Through my blogging "career" (haha!), my own thinking has changed on this. I now think of what I write as much more article-ish, if not actual articles. Some of my early posts, going back to 2003, wouldn't even be recognizable under this rubric.

The change has occurred mainly because 1) I started to realize that people were actually reading what I wrote, and like it or not, words written down anywhere tend to take the halo of truth even if meant as a casual, off-the-cuff remark; and 2) I've begun to think of my blog as a space for trying out pre-articles as I work on larger, more formal articles that will appear in print.

Plus with every mainstream mag now accompanied by a blog, the posts there essentially are articles. They may be written in a more casual voice, but if it says "Time" or "Wired" at the top of the page, that post has all the cultural weight of an article.

I see the distinction exactly as you have worded it. The questions that blogging raise for me are, however, perplexing and I'd love to know what you think. For example, if a blog has the potential to damage somebody lightly or to disturb the signing of a contract or to be part of any kind of future action with an unknown or known negative consequence, how obligated are you to check, double check and triple check your information? Is it useful to couch your blog in "this is what I've heards" or "the gossip mill is spewing such and such"?

We are still feeling our way on fact checking, it seems. My guess is that those whose blog posts consistently deliver the truth to the very best of the bloggers' abilities will rise to the top. When it comes to breaking news, this is essential. This is harder to do without an editor and in the speedy world of blogging, the pressure is fierce to release "the news" as soon as you get it. No?

What are your standards?
Best,
Sasha Anawalt

Leave a comment

Me Elsewhere

Blogroll

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by lies like truth published on May 11, 2008 12:28 PM.

Glory Day(s) was the previous entry in this blog.

There's Beauty In Limbo is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

AJ Ads

Introducing
AJ Arts Blog Ads

Now you can reach the most discerning arts blog readers on the internet. Target individual blogs or topics in the ArtsJournal ad network.

Advertise Here

AJ Blogs

AJBlogCentral | rss

culture
About Last Night
Terry Teachout on the arts in New York City
Artful Manager
Andrew Taylor on the business of arts & culture
blog riley
rock culture approximately
critical difference
Laura Collins-Hughes on arts, culture and coverage
Dewey21C
Richard Kessler on arts education
diacritical
Douglas McLennan's blog
Dog Days
Dalouge Smith advocates for the Arts
Flyover
Art from the American Outback
Life's a Pitch
For immediate release: the arts are marketable
Mind the Gap
No genre is the new genre
Performance Monkey
David Jays on theatre and dance
Plain English
Paul Levy measures the Angles
Real Clear Arts
Judith H. Dobrzynski on Culture
Rockwell Matters
John Rockwell on the arts
Straight Up |
Jan Herman - arts, media & culture with 'tude

dance
Foot in Mouth
Apollinaire Scherr talks about dance
Seeing Things
Tobi Tobias on dance et al...

jazz
Jazz Beyond Jazz
Howard Mandel's freelance Urban Improvisation
ListenGood
Focus on New Orleans. Jazz and Other Sounds
Rifftides
Doug Ramsey on Jazz and other matters...

media
Out There
Jeff Weinstein's Cultural Mixology
Serious Popcorn
Martha Bayles on Film...

classical music
Creative Destruction
Fresh ideas on building arts communities
The Future of Classical Music?
Greg Sandow performs a book-in-progress
On the Record
Exploring Orchestras w/ Henry Fogel
Overflow
Harvey Sachs on music, and various digressions
PianoMorphosis
Bruce Brubaker on all things Piano
PostClassic
Kyle Gann on music after the fact
Sandow
Greg Sandow on the future of Classical Music
Slipped Disc
Norman Lebrecht on Shifting Sound Worlds

publishing
book/daddy
Jerome Weeks on Books
Quick Study
Scott McLemee on books, ideas & trash-culture ephemera

theatre
Drama Queen
Wendy Rosenfield: covering drama, onstage and off
lies like truth
Chloe Veltman on how culture will save the world

visual
Aesthetic Grounds
Public Art, Public Space
Another Bouncing Ball
Regina Hackett takes her Art To Go
Artopia
John Perreault's art diary
CultureGrrl
Lee Rosenbaum's Cultural Commentary
Modern Art Notes
Tyler Green's modern & contemporary art blog
Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.