AJ Logo an ARTSJOURNAL weblog | ArtsJournal Home | AJ Blog Central

« September 2006 | Main | November 2006 »

October 30, 2006

A DIFFERENT KIND OF BUSHWACK

Now for a change of pace: "Notre Dame de Video," a leetle sumzeeng I made for the arts fest TROIS SOIRS PARMI long ago in très gai Paris. Thought you might get a tsk-tsk out of a few video stills.

TROIS SOIRS PARMINDdV ran on a bill with Jochen Gerz's very sober conceptual piece, "La Salle et sa représentation," on March 16, 1972. Location: 19 Quai Bourbon on Ile Saint-Louis, a stone's throw from the cathedral Notre-Dame de Paris on Ile de la Cité. Thus the title of the video.

Other artists in the festival, besides Jochen Gerz and me, were Bernard Heidsieck and Françoise Janicot (the organizers); Paul-Armand Gette, Lourdes Castro, René Bertholo, Jan Nordahl and Pedro Morais.

I played the video on a 2-inch monitor. It sat shoulder high on a pedestal in the middle of a room as vast as a Louvre gallery. Word buzzed through the crowd. ("Yum, that's quoit noice!") In fact, the best thing about NDdV was the Peeping Tom effect.

As people gathered to lay eyes on Our Lady, some jockeyed for position. Rowdies cut in line to grab a peek. Fist fights broke out. What a spectacle that was.
NOTRE
BUSHWACKED 1
DAME
BUSHWACKED 2
de
BUSHWACKED 3
VIDEO

Just kidding about the fist fights. The jockeying was very polite, and there were no rowdies.

Posted by jherman at 8:23 AM

October 28, 2006

HUMAN WRONGS

More wisdom from le maître Doctorow:

Human rights is a term of great currency in our political language. When introduced, it tended to refer to a person's right to speak freely or to hold any political opinion of his choosing or to be tried swiftly and under due process of law in the event he was accused of a crime -- in general, to any of the collective rights of Americans under the Constitution. But under pressure of worldwide practices, the term has taken on a humbler meaning. Now human rights refers to standards of treatment that you hope to expect of your oppressor after he has taken all your rights away.
He should not pack you away in an isolation cell while denying publicly that you're under detention; he should not salt you away in a labor camp after a sentence by a kangaroo court; he should not on a whim machinegun you in the street or hack you to death in your bed or with relish take you to a ditch and break every bone in your body before killing you. If you're an infant, you have the right not to have your skull smashed against a wall; if a nursing mother, not to have your breasts sliced off; if a nun, not to be raped and disemboweled; if an old man, not to be made to defecate in front of a crowd and eat your own excrement; if a boy or a young man, not to be castrated and have your severed organs stuffed into your mouth. The right not to have those things done to you -- the right not to be tortured, mutilated, enslaved, or injudiciously murdered -- is what we've come to mean by the term human rights.

Excerpted from the essay "Orwell's 1984," which is reprinted in "Jack London, Hemingway, and the Constitution: Selected Essays, 1977-1992"

Posted by jherman at 2:02 PM

BANANA REPUBLICANS

Two news reports. One about a former Chilean dictator. One about our Bullshitter-in-Chief. Note the similarities. This from Reuters regarding Augusto Pinochet's arrest for torture, murder and kidnapping early in his regime and this from the BBC regarding the bullshitter's denial that the U.S. uses torture.

Is it possible we'll read one day about the arrest of a former U.S. president on the same sort of charges? (Pinochet is being held "for 36 cases of kidnapping, one of homicide and for 23 cases of torture" committed at a detention center run by his secret police.)

To ask the question implies an answer -- and why, despite claims to the contrary (such as "saving American lives"), the bullshitter's Republican enablers rammed through the Military Commissions Act of 2006.

The new law was designed to protect him and his henchmen from potential prosecution.

As reported by ABC News:

The legislation says the president can "interpret the meaning and application" of international standards for prisoner treatment, a provision intended to allow him to authorize aggressive interrogation methods that might otherwise be seen as illegal by international courts.

The bill not only "authorizes continued harsh interrogations of terror suspects," it applies to "14 suspects who were secretly questioned by the CIA overseas and recently moved to the U.S. detention center at Guantanamo Bay."

Since the interrogations are top secret, there is no way to verify the bullshitter's claims. But even if American lives have been saved, the legislation is a statist endorsement of thuggery. It puts government officials beyond the reach of justice by bending the law to their purpose. And it contradicts the U.S. Constitution, let alone American ideals (if not the realities).

Posted by jherman at 1:33 PM

October 27, 2006

ON A BICYCLE AND A PRAYER

Above WSJ's front page bannerDeadline for Iraq? Rummy Boy says we should "just back off" and "relax." The Bullshitter-in-Chief holds his own press conference, then invites a few friendly journalists into the back room -- excuse me -- the Oval Office, and says, "If we leave, they will follow us here." (Subscription required.)

WSJ's front page bannerWhat struck one of the invited -- Daniel Henninger, deputy editor of The Journal's editorial page -- was how different the bullshitter's press conference was from his private conversation. In public the topic was Iraq. In the Oval Office it was America. But if you read Henninger's rightly named Wonder Land column, it all sounds like the same bullshit. As Lenny Bruce once said, "Yada, yada. Yada, yada, yada, warden!"

Meanwhile, ever on the lookout to probe deeply, Henninger noticed:

The burden of war ... has not sapped Mr. Bush physically. ... The hair's gone gray, but there is little sign of fatigue in his face or demeanor. I asked how he stays normal: "Prayer and exercise."

Or as Jon Stewart has said, "Worry no more!"

Postscript: A friend writes: "I am not for 'cutting and running.' How about just walking out backwards?"

Posted by jherman at 10:07 AM

October 26, 2006

LIKE FATHER, LIKE SON

When you think of E.L. Doctorow, it's his fiction that comes to mind -- all those novels, "Ragtime" most famously, but also "The Book of Daniel," "Welcome to Hard Times," his latest "The March," and so on. But wait a minute! The guy's a terrific essayist.

E.L. Doctorow [Photo: Nancy Crampton]I've been reading "Jack London, Hemingway, and the Constitution," an out-of-print collection of his selected essays you can pick up for a buck, which Mugs McGuinness was kind enough to send me. Here's a morsel from one of them -- it's called "The Character of Presidents" -- and it tastes delish:

You and I can lie about our actions and misrepresent the actions of others; we can piously pretend to principles we don't believe in; we can whine and blame others for the wrong that we do. We can think only of ourselves and our own and be brutally indifferent to the needs of everyone else. We can manipulate people, call them names, con them and rob them blind. Our virtuosity is inexhaustible, as would be expected of a race of Original Sinners, and without doubt we will all have our Maker to answer to. But as to a calculus of damage done, the devastation left behind, the person who holds the most powerful political office in the world and does these things and acts in these ways is multiplied in his moral failure to a number beyond the imagining of the rest of us.

Remember that when the Bullshitter-in-Chief's enablers are up for election on November 7.

Doctorow wrote "The Character of Presidents" in 1992, and he was thinking not of the bullshitter but of his father. I quote:
Out of print, but you can pick it up for a buck.

Mr. Bush is a man who lies. Senator Dole, who ran against him in 1988 [for the Republican presidential nomination], was the first to tell us that. Vice President Bush lied about his opponents in the primaries, and he lied about Mr. Dukakis in the elections. President Bush lies today about the bills he vetoes, as he lies about his involvement in the arms-for-hostages trade with Iran and continues to lie, even though he has been directly contradicted by two former secretaries in the Reagan Cabinet -- Shultz and Weinberger -- and a former staff member of the National Security Council. He lies about what he did in the past and about why is he doing what he is doing in the present. He speaks for civil rights but blocks legislation that would relieve racial inequities. He speaks for the environment but opposes measures to slow its despoliation.

One irony, of course, is that the bullshitter's father is regarded today as the wise and gentle one. If it were true -- which it isn't -- it's only in comparison with his son, who is responsible for even greater damage and certainly more than enough devastation to shame them both.

Posted by jherman at 1:53 PM

October 25, 2006

NOT A TRICK PHOTO

Given the name of this blog, my staff of thousands dared me:

Enlarge it. This is not a trick photo. [Photo © David Safanda]

Nah, that's not me. That's rock climber extraordinaire Chris Mac, a k a Chris McNamara, snowboarding in midair over Lover's Leap (a climb "Rated X") above Lake Tahoe, California. Photo © David Safanda, via Summit Journal, an adventure and exploration magazine on the Web that describes itself as "environmentally responsible." It "weighs 0 grams, pollutes 0 waters, fills 0 landfills, causes 0 deforestation, disturbs 0 wildlife and relies on 0 fossil fuels for dissemination ... leaving no trace."

Postscript: From a friend: "Great photo of the American electorate in flight."

Posted by jherman at 10:04 AM

October 24, 2006

UNSTAYING THE UNCOURSE

Now for the latest addition to the Ministry of Truth's dictionary of Newspeak, offered on camera by the Bullshitter-in-Chief: "We've never been stay the course. ..."

For the record, note the difference between a skeptical story of the uncourse told with a smile, "Bush's New Tack Steers Clear of 'Stay the Course,'" and a credulous story told with a straight face, "Bush Abandons Phrase 'Stay the Course' on Iraq."

The first, from the Washington Post, begins:

President Bush and his aides are annoyed that people keep misinterpreting his Iraq policy as "stay the course." A complete distortion, they say. "That is not a stay-the-course policy," White House press secretary Tony Snow declared yesterday.

Where would anyone have gotten that idea? Well, maybe from Bush.

"We will stay the course. We will help this young Iraqi democracy succeed," he said in Salt Lake City in August.

"We will win in Iraq so long as we stay the course," he said in Milwaukee in July.

"I saw people wondering whether the United States would have the nerve to stay the course and help them succeed," he said after returning from Baghdad in June.

The second, from The New York Times, begins:

The White House said Monday that President Bush was no longer using the phrase "stay the course" when speaking about the Iraq war, in a new effort to emphasize flexibility in the face of some of the bloodiest violence there since the 2003 invasion.

"He stopped using it," said Tony Snow, the White House press secretary. "It left the wrong impression about what was going on and it allowed critics to say, 'Well, here's an administration that's just embarked upon a policy and not looking at what the situation is,' when, in fact, it is the opposite."

Mr. Bush used the slogan in a stump speech on Aug. 31, but has not repeated it for some time. Still, Mr. Snow's pronouncement was a stark example of the complicated line the White House is walking this election year in trying to tag Democrats as wanting to "cut and run" from Iraq, without itself appearing wedded to unsuccessful tactics there.

Postscript: Pat Tillman (left) and his brother Kevin before their tour of duty in Iraq in 2003 [Courtesy of the Tillman Family, via truthdigg.com]Kevin Tillman, pictured with his brother Pat, has much to say about the "illegal invasion" of Iraq and the Orwellian nature of the bullshitter's regime, including this:

Somehow subversion of the Bill of Rights and The Constitution is tolerated.
Somehow suspension of Habeas Corpus is supposed to keep this country safe.
Somehow torture is tolerated.
Somehow lying is tolerated.
Somehow reason is being discarded for faith, dogma, and nonsense.
Somehow American leadership managed to create a more dangerous world.
Somehow a narrative is more important than reality.

Kevin Tillman joined the Army with Pat in 2002 and served with him in Iraq and Afghanistan. In Afghanistan Pat was killed by friendly fire. The Pentagon lied about the circumstances of his death, claiming he was killed by the Taliban, to exploit him as a hero and prop up the image of the Army.

Posted by jherman at 9:44 AM

October 23, 2006

THE OLD MUD-HOLE APPROACH

The military analysis by Michael Gordon, "To Stand or Fall in Baghdad: Capital Is Key to Mission," is getting a lot of attention from The Huffington Post, not least because it appears above the fold on the front page of The New York Times. Gordon discusses the failure of the military plan to "clear, hold and build" Baghdad, "the center of gravity for the larger American mission in Iraq."

The Huffington Post Daily Brief
MILITARY'S BAGHDAD PLAN:
LAST CHANCE TO SECURE IRAQ

The analysis is not new news. It's basically a wrap-up of what's been happening in the neighborhoods controlled by the militias or threatened by the death squads in the genocidal civil war there. And it's curiously bloodless, making no mention of the death squads or the civil war. Instead it substitutes the antiseptic term "sectarian strife."

But deep in the story there's a revealing comment by the general who commands the American forces in Baghdad that isn't likely to get the attention it deserves. It's revealing because it describes the problem in an analogy that unintentionally compares Iraq to a mud hole, which is a perfect illustration of the military's true take on the country, let alone the so-called mission.

"We can do the clearing," the general tells Gordon. "But once you clear if you don't leave somebody in there and build civil capacity in there then it is the old mud-hole approach. You know the water runs out of the mud hole when you drive through the mud hole and then it runs back in it."

Posted by jherman at 11:27 AM

RUMMY IS OUR SHEPHERD

We shall not want:

MIAMI (AFP) -- The top U.S. general defended the leadership of Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, saying it is inspired by God. "He leads in a way that the good Lord tells him is best for our country," said Marine General Peter Pace, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

Methinks the general's cup runneth over.

Postscript: Two weeks later, on Nov. 6 ...

NavyTimes

Military Times editorial:
'Rumsfeld must go'

Posted by jherman at 9:33 AM

October 20, 2006

WO IST DIE 'OPERA TOILET'?

Opera Toilet [AP Photo/Ronald Zak]In Austria, of course. From ein treuer Freund:

ach, herr jan -- ve in vienna can't underschtand all uf der fuss, ja? i'm qvite schure dot herr wagner vould haff lufft zuch decor.

A 'ready-made' [Marcel du Champ, 1917]But what would R. Mutt have thought?

PS: As noted two years ago on PervScan, urinals with lips were supposed to be installed at New York's John F. Kennedy International Airport.

Posted by jherman at 9:35 AM

October 16, 2006

SERIOUSLY LAME JOURNOSPEAK

I never read Lloyd Grove's gossip column in New York's Daily News. So I dunno how good, bad or indifferent it was. But he seems to be getting lots of mileage out of being dumped, including an op-ed piece in Sunday's LA Times (thank you, Romenesko). Here's what grabbed my eye:

From time to time, distinguished papers such as [T]he New York Times and the Los Angeles Times have ventured into this frisky territory, but have usually ended their walk on the wild side in a hand-wringing identity crisis: Can we be serious journalists and still publish a gossip column?

To "venture into frisky territory" is lame journospeak, far too prim to equate with "A Walk on the Wild Side," the title of Nelson Algren's classic 1956 novel (set among the pimps, whores and con men of Depression-era New Orleans). It's just one more proof of Algren's devaluation.

I've written before that the title of the novel has been "popularized and co-opted as an idiomatic phrase by Hollywood and Madison Avenue." I should have added journalists, of course, especially headline writers, along with crossdresser boutiques, nature tour operators, animal rescuers, bloggers, nudist surfers, academics, gay activists, and so on.

All of them would have earned a contemptuous chuckle from Algren, if only because of injured pride. But Jimmy Smith's bluesy, laid-back "Walk," though not stellar to my taste, is one use I'm sure he would have approved.

Posted by jherman at 12:43 PM

October 11, 2006

KEITH OLBERMANN HAS THE RIGHT INITIALS

So much goes by so swiftly, there's no point in trying to catch up. But KO's recent editorials must be noted as knockouts. I'm thinking particularly of his special commentary on lying, broadcast on Oct. 5. I presume you've seen it. If not, you missed the single best opinion piece on mainstream television. For that matter, it may have been the best to appear anywhere.

Keith Watch it. Read it. Relish it. The Bullshitter-in-Chief "comes across as a compulsive liar," he says. He "has savaged the very freedoms he claims to be protecting from attack," and "it is now impossible to find a consistent thread of logic as to who [he] believes the enemy is."

It seems to me no accident that "Countdown," Olbermann's daily cable show on MSNBC, has doubled its audience. But if god forbid the Republicans retain control of the Congress after next month's mid-term elections, will MSNBC execs keep him on the air? Or will he be Donahued? Given their lack of principles in the past -- and notwithstanding Olbermann's own comment that "as long as you make them money, they don't care" --- let's hope they're not put to the test.

PS: A friend writes:

A Keith Olbermann classicI've been watching him a long time & he just gets better. Did you catch his piece on the elimination of habeas corpus, the one where he draws a big red X through one article after another in the Bill of Rights? It's a classic.

PPS: Yes, I caught it. And this, too, the day before, "Habeas corpus sellout," by Nat Hentoff. And just this morning (Oct. 15) the NYT editorial "Guilty Until Confirmed Guilty." Another friend writes, "That Hentoff's piece appeared in The Washington Times gives me hope." Ha. Doan make me laff. The whole shebang is a mockery.

Posted by jherman at 2:14 PM

ROLLERMUSICK

Have you watched this Mozart video? "I can see ole Wolfie," a friend writes, "up there in music box heaven, shittin' his brocade pantaloons!"

Posted by jherman at 9:13 AM

October 4, 2006

GONE

Been traveling. Still am.

Posted by jherman at 2:26 PM