« I FIND IT STRANGE . . . | Main | FIRST THE BLOG, THEN THE REBLOG »
June 03, 2005
MEMORY LANE: WOODWARD SORT OF OUTSIDE THE BELTWAY
Now that Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein are together again, taking a victory lap after all these years,
like the Simon & Garfunkel of journalism, I'm reminded by my staff of thousands that once upon a
time, long ago and far away, I interviewed Woodward about his only non-political book -- the one
out of the Beltway, for which he is least known -- "Wired: The
Short Life & Fast Times of John Belushi."

You'll excuse me for this nostalgia trip. But my staff insists. So here goes. Woodward had come to Chicago for the interview. The town where he grew up, Wheaton, Ill., was not far away. His brother and sister lived there. His father was a retired judge who was still practicing law there. Belushi, too, had grown up in Wheaton. Predictably, I began by asking about that.
What was your life there?
How did it change?
A good friend of mine got me interested in books. John Belushi got interested in rock 'n' roll. That's one primordial difference.
Both of us played on the same high school football team with the same coach, Howard Barnes. I remember he put me on the team and said, "You have the best attitude of anyone. But you're one of the worst football players." I think Belushi was the opposite. He was one of the best football players and had one of the worst attitudes. ...
You were attracted to the Belushi story because you said it was about "the failure of success." What were the pressues on you from fame and success?
You've got a lot of people wanting things -- people saying "This is the way you ought to invest," or "Why don't you come to my party?" You're on call. It seems to me the defense against that, which is quite artificial, is not to take success too seriously. To sort of see that it was luck. And to realize very quickly how easy it could have been a failure.
Certainly Watergate for me was like that. A lot of people thought we were wrong, and it seemed like a failure for many months. So the dividing line between success and failure is not that great.
Wasn't there any exhilaration?
Look, Watergate was not a happy story. Just like the Belushi story. They're somewhat alike in that respect. You don't get any joy out of it.
You must have gotten some joy from clinching the story.
I remember the night Nixon resigned. I was sitting in the office of the Washington Post. Carl and I weren't writing that story. I was eating a baloney sandwich, watching his speech. We were sort of saying, "We don't have a story to write. What are we gonna do?" I remember getting in my car -- it was raining that night -- and just sort of feeling a little empty. There was no dancing.How different were the pressures on you from those on Belushi?
There's the same pressure to have a second act. And a third. And a fourth. The thing that has helped me the most is being anchored at the Washington Post. Unless they want to fire me, I'll always stay there. If you stick to what you've learned to do and not try other things like writing novels or going into television or writing screenplays, it gives you an anchor.
That sounds like a veiled reference to Bernstein. What's the different between how you dealt with your success and how he did?
We've both made mistakes, and we went on. ...
Was your relationship with him ever threatened?
Oh yeah, all the time. We didn't like each other at first. We didn't get on. There was always a struggle between us. Strong egos. different points of view. Different ideas.
Arrrgghhh. Enough with the nostalgia. It's funky Friday. I'm outta here.
Posted by at June 3, 2005 09:41 AM
