« MALCOLM GLADWELL BLINKS AT ABBIE CONANT | Main | A) MARK GREEN, B) DEAR LEADER, AND C) MSM »
April 05, 2005
GAWKING ALL THE WAY
As Gawker says about David Brooks's blooper correction: "We'd roll the laugh track if anyone actually knew what the hell he was talking about. Or cared." Also, check Paul Krugman's funny-if-it-wasn't-so-true refer (this morning, too):In its April Fools' Day issue, Scientific American published a spoof editorial in which it apologized for endorsing the theory of evolution just because it's "the unifying concept for all of biology and one of the greatest scientific ideas of all time," saying that "as editors, we had no business being persuaded by mountains of evidence." And it conceded that it had succumbed "to the easy mistake of thinking that scientists understand their fields better than, say, U.S. senators or best-selling novelists do."
The editorial was titled "O.K., We Give Up." But it could just as well have been called "Why So Few Scientists Are Republicans These Days." Thirty years ago, attacks on science came mostly from the left; these days, they come overwhelmingly from the right, and have the backing of leading Republicans.
Scientific American may think that evolution is supported by mountains of evidence, but President Bush declares that "the jury is still out." Senator James Inhofe dismisses the vast body of research supporting the scientific consensus on climate change as a "gigantic hoax." And conservative pundits like George Will write approvingly about Michael Crichton's anti-environmentalist fantasies.
If you've ever seen Krugman in person or on television, you'll have noticed his darting eyes. They say to me he laughs a lot.
Posted by at April 5, 2005 12:02 PM
