« GOOSING THE GANDER | Main | NOAM CHOMSKY PLUS ONE »
December 02, 2004
SWITCHING NEWS CHANNELS
Now that Tom Brokaw is gone as NBC News anchor, his handsome successor Brian Edwards has already begun filling his shoes. "I feel the weight of history," Edwards said in an interview this morning on the network's "Today" show. It's that kind of baloney that's objectionable in him, not his handsomeness.
But the truth is that baloney is an occupational hazard for all the network news anchors, even ABC's Peter Jennings, who is the least pretentious among them.
So why not switch channels to the one daily news program that refuses to offer baloney from the anchor's chair? Why not try the morning broadcast of Democracy Now!, where Amy Goodman runs the show with co-host Juan Gonzalez? She's not just smart or a woman -- Hey, Ms. Dowd, get with it -- she and her cohorts have the best intro music of all the national news programs.
Yes, Democracy Now! may be seen every morning from 8 to 9 on local TV stations across the country and in Canada. Can't catch it at that hour? Then listen and/or watch it on the Web.
The program offers depth and perspective lacking on newscasts everywhere else. For instance, here's Noam Chomsky speaking about Yasser Arafat, Iraq and the draft. Chomsky offers the most cogent analysis you're likely to hear on television about what's going on in the Middle East and how it is distorted by the news media (led by The New York Times in presenting the official view of historic events).
He refers, for instance, to the forgotten fact that Egyptian President Anwar Sadat offered the same peace treaty to Israel in 1971 that was finally accepted in 1979, following the 1973 Arab-Israeli war and Sadat's 1977 visit to Jerusalem, and the equally important but conveniently overlooked U.S. objection to the settlement in the first place ("what Kissinger called stalemate in his memoirs").
"The U.S. refusal to accept a peaceful settlement in 1971 led to a terrible war, very dangerous" for Israel, including a nuclear alert, Chomsky points out, as well as "years of suffering and misery with effects that still are very much there. But it shows the advantages of owning history. You can kind of reshape it into your own -- to satisfy your own needs."
You don't get that kind of commentary on the nightly network news shows.
Chomsky also explains why we won't see a draft to put more soldiers in Iraq: The Army learned in Vietnam that draftees, as opposed to professional mercenaries, cannot be depended upon to fight unjust wars when they're long and hard. Once citizen soldiers discover they're fighting in a wrong cause, they lose their willingness to fight. They begin "fragging" their officers, and so on.
As casualties mount, moreover, the nation at large pays the price in blood for a draftee army, not just the narrower, more easily contained segment of the population represented by military families. We already see that happening with the unpopular call-up of the National Guard.
Postscript: Is the FBI watching you surf the Web? Check this.
Posted by at December 2, 2004 10:08 AM
