« THUGS IN THE WHITE HOUSE | Main | ARNOLD, BILL AND YOKO »
September 15, 2003
ZANKEL HALL AGAIN
So <
FONT color=#003399>what about those acoustics? More
verdicts are in, all tentative of course. "Clearly, the acoustics are
excellent," writes Howard Kissel of the New York Daily
News. Anthony Tommasini of The New York Times, following up his first piece, writes this
morning that "the discretely amplified Kenny Barron Quintet, a jazz ensemble, sounded
just right in the new space." But Times jazz critic Ben
Ratliffe agrees with Arts Journal's Terry Teachout.
(Scroll down.) Ratliff reports,
Postscript: Music critic Martin Bernheimer adds his grace notes to the audio mix in today's Financial Times. He writes:
Zankel Hall offers no visual shocks. The entrance facilities are modest, the escalators narrow, the lobbies rather cramped. The auditorium adheres to old-fashioned shoebox proportions. The interior walls are lined with sweet-smelling wood, and the ceilings harbour unadorned lighting grids. The seats offer little spacious comfort, and currently there's no center aisle.Still, this is a reasonably handsome, few-frills hall, a work still in progress. It seems to court serious danger only in its rumbling proximity to the subway system. From the side of the 10th row, downstairs, the sound at the opening concert seemed live and bright, too much so in fortissimo outbursts. We'll know more about the acoustics, of course, as time marches on, as internal tests change and mechanical variables are adjusted.
Just in case you noticed the British spelling, i.e. harbour: Bernheimer's no Brit. He's the Pulitzer Prize-winning former chief music critic of the Los Angeles Times and -- not to wave the flag -- U.S.-born and -bred.
Posted by at September 15, 2003 08:58 AM
