ArtsJournal's New Look

Comments

  1. Can’t you centre the page? it looks kinda funny with the page pushed to the left when i have the window maximised.

  2. Would you consider a Comments area for each featured article? I’d be interesting in hearing AJ readers opinions on issues of the day.
    The archives, by the way, were quite useful. I found it instructive to go back to previous years and see how stories and threads developed in different parts of the arts world.
    Ravi Narasimhan
    Redondo Beach, CA

  3. The articles hanging to the left is a bit unsettling – especially with all that white space on the right. I do prefer seeing stories grouped under the topic headings to picking around for interesting stories in this new story stew approach. Teaser headlines, alone, are annoying. Hmmm. But I guess I must choose. Headlines or smorgasbord. Change is good. Change is good. Thanks for this great service. Change is good.

  4. Jack Xiang says:

    This is a wonderful layout.

  5. the blogs are fine, but the new layout for the stories is a pain when I don't have much time and just want to read about music and dance

  6. Sorry, but I have to agree. I love reading Arts Journal everday, but the new layout for the articles is a mess. All that text smashed together is hard to read and I miss the topic headlines that organized groups of stories.

  7. The fact that you are able to compile all of this for me to read every week is wonderful. I live in a small Caribbean island and so to be able to find, in one place, arts news from all over the world, is fabulous for me.
    Love the new layout and choices of how we can read it.
    Thank you thank you, for keeping me in the loop, while I live in Paradise! Corrie Scott

  8. I agree with Beate. I only care about a couple of categories. Now I have to sift through all the stories to find the ones that I care about. Very annoying.

  9. I like the new look, but I would also like to cast a vote for grouping stories by subject. Even though I usually read everything, it’s *extremely* useful to have articles arranged in categories, especially when I’m short on time!

  10. Patrick Frank says:

    The video is a nice idea. But can it please be AN OPTION to load it rather than an automatic thing? Consumes bandwidth!!!!

  11. The new look? Attractive in many ways, but not particularly user-friendly.
    The type in the middle and righthand columns is just too small to be read easily.
    Agree with others that articles ought be be grouped by subject (as they were previously) and about the lefthand column being too long and leaving too much white space to the right.
    And, damn, that type is small. Or did I already mention that?

  12. Yes, I too am disurbed by the new organization of stories. You had it right. Now it’s too cumbersome to deal with. Please revert to organization by subject matter!

  13. roger dettmer says:

    The “new” look is as confusing as it is bizarre. Why can’t AJ’s honchos leave well enough intact? As for Henry Fogel as a staff blogger, the only dumber cast member is Terry Teachout.
    Bah, humbug. You used to be valuable.

  14. ArtsJournal readers seem to have a reading-comprehension problem.
    As the editor clearly explained: “I realize that many of you come to ArtsJournal for only one category of story – music, or visual arts, or dance… If that’s the way you want to continue to read the site, click on any of the topic links on the ribbon across the top of AJ and you’ll see the stories collected by topic. And, for those of you who prefer to read just the headlines, there’s a page where you can see all stories by headline only. If you miss a day, our “previous days” page displays the last five days of postings.”

  15. Barry Adams says:

    I love artsjournal but the new look is harder to read and cluttered. Why munch everything to the left?
    Next time y’all should consider erecting a trial page and soliciting user comments before going “whole hog.”

  16. You sure have one tough audience for a free service.

  17. I liked having all the music, dance, people etc, still divided on the main front page. While it is nice to have a quick click above, when I use to scroll down, I might have seen a topic in another section that was interesting. I don’t like scrolling down with a mismash of titles and topics.
    Also, center the page.
    Otherwise, it is very excellent.

  18. Walter Hawn says:

    I have to agree with most of the above.
    I don’t mind the hodge-podge of subjects. That’s good for me, as I’m a hodge-podge kinda guy, but scanning through the stories offered takes a very long time. The précis blocks are too large for good visual design and the headlines don’t jump out far enough.
    Overall, the page is ugly and cluttered.

  19. Less is more. The new format makes it harder to zero in on useful information quickly. For some reason, I couldn't get a subject page to download with only the selected topic headlines.

  20. fleetfootphil says:

    This new format junks up the whole thing. I feel like I’m looking at People Magazine online. Why not toss in some ads and maybe some blinking lights too?

  21. Elizabeth Bradley says:

    Reading comprehension issue or not, per the editor’s comment, I can not locate in the format in which I receive Arts Journal a “topic header” for Theatre which takes me to those stories only. I must agree with the dissenters. The previous format was comprehensive and clear. It is much more difficult to parse through the current site and determine my interest level in the content. I appreciate the opportunity to comment.

  22. I think the new layout is fantastic! At first glance, it was confusing, buut really it has organized things even more thoroughly. Thanks for all the hard work!

  23. Please please go back to sorting by subject! I’m sure some people have the time and the inclination to meander through all the articles each week, but some of us need to be more targeted about getting to the articles that are relevant to our work. Please?

  24. My blog violainvilnius.blogspot.com has a link to the arts journal in its sidebar, showing the latest stories in the arts journal. They are great stories! But have a look at how old the stories are – they must have been there for over a month. Has something broken?

  25. George W. Gussak says:

    How much revenue is generated by or through the arts on a national level? Fine arts, published art, music, dance, theater, museums, etc. I was asked and frankly was stumped to get a handle on this. Who can I ask, where can I look?

Speak Your Mind

*

an ArtsJournal blog