<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>CultureGrrl</title>
        <link>http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/</link>
        <description>Lee Rosenbaum&apos;s cultural commentary</description>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2012</copyright>
        <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:43:33 -0500</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
        
        <item>
            <title>Back to Australia: Michael Brand to Direct Art Gallery of New South Wales</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<img alt="BrandM2.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/BrandM2.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="400" width="267" /><br /><br /><b>Michael Brand</b>, landing on his feet after his <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2010/02/getty-brand_face-off_ex-direct.html">rocky time</a> at the Getty and his interim position as consulting director of the in-construction Aga Khan Museum, Toronto, is heading back to his native Australia. <br /><br /><a href="http://www.artgallery.nsw.gov.au/media-office/michael-brand-appointed-director-art-gallery-nsw/">This announcement</a> just hit my inbox:<br /><br /><blockquote>Michael Brand...has 
been appointed director of the <a href="http://www.artgallery.nsw.gov.au/">Art Gallery of New South Wales</a>.<br /></blockquote>Brand said the following about his new gig in Sydney, which will begin in the middle of this year:<br /><br /><blockquote>While they [the AGNSW] are rightly focused on serving their primary audience and promoting Australian art, they are also resolutely international in their approach to art and culture.<br /></blockquote>The museum is currently hosting a blockbuster <a href="http://www.artgallery.nsw.gov.au/exhibitions/picasso/">Picasso show</a>, touring from the in-renovation Musée National Picasso, Paris.<br /><br /><b>Nicholas Serota</b>, director of the Tate Gallery, London, advised the Sydney Museum in its search.<br /><br />All of which brings to mind the continued uncertain status of the Getty Museum, where J. Paul Getty Trust president <b>Jim Cuno</b> is presently doing double duty as museum director, after the <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2011/12/explaining_the_bomford_bombshe.html">departure of David Bomford</a>, who assumed the acting directorship when Brand departed in January 2010. I recently heard a rumor that there would be an announcement regarding the Getty's vacant directorship this spring, but, alas, that rumor wasn't attached to a name. <br /><br />Then I saw the Frick's <b>Colin Bailey</b> at Monday's press preview for the pleasurable <a href="http://www.frick.org/exhibitions/renoir/">Renoir, Impressionism and Full-Length Painting</a>, and a light went on. Like curators <a href="http://lagunaartmuseum.org/laguna-art-museum-announces-executive-director">Malcolm Warner</a> of the Kimbell and both <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2011/12/texan_tinterow_mets_loss_is_ho.html">Gary Tinterow</a> and <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2011/05/ian_wardropper_the_fricks_surp.html">Ian Wardropper</a> of the Met, all of whom recently left their institutions to direct others, Bailey is a longtime top curator who got passed over when a higher position was handed out at his place. As <b>CultureGrrl</b> readers know, he has <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2007/10/attention_museum_headhunters_t.html">previously shown interest</a> in becoming a museum director.<br /><br />What's more, I think it would be difficult to find someone already directing a major museum who would want to subordinate himself to the strong-willed Cuno. Someone stepping up to a first-time directorship up might be the ideal candidate, under the circumstances.<br /><br />This <b>CultureGrrl</b> guess probably has as much accuracy as <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2008/08/name_that_met_director_the_gam.html">this one</a> did. Then again....<br /><br /><img alt="Bailey.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/Bailey.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="388" width="258" /><br /><strong>Colin Bailey, Peter Jay Sharp Chief Curator, The Frick Collection</strong><br />]]></description>
            <link>http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2012/02/back_to_australia_michael_bran.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2012/02/back_to_australia_michael_bran.html</guid>
            
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:43:33 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>The Return of CultureGrrl: Resuming (occasional) Posting</title>
            <description><![CDATA[I have been deeply moved by the letters and verbal comments that I've received over the last month from devoted <b>CultureGrrl</b> fans (including some artworld luminaries). Some expressed distress over my <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2012/01/valedictory_post_thanks_from_c.html">plan to kill the blog</a>; some wished me future success and expressed gratitude for my long run of uncompensated commentary.<br /><br />I wrote that I would give myself at least a month to decide whether to end the blog permanently. I ultimately agreed with one appreciative reader, who clicked my "CONTACT ME" link and sought to persuade me to continue (in modified form) what I had started, some five and a half years ago. Here's what he advised:<br /><br /><blockquote> I think it is very important for you to keep your blog. It is a record of your
voice, and it is not colored (I hope) by the need to appease any particular faction. I also applaud and hope you continue to get WSJ and NPR/PBS etc.-type
gigs. They put an authoritarive stamp on you: The powers that be, such as they are,
want to associate themselves with your voice.<br /><br /> 

But I do believe the centerpiece is the blog: It is your history; it is a place
people who know you can come or tell others to come. Now I think you have great
flexibility and should use significant ingenuity about how you use your blog.
 Perhaps it is one good post a week; perhaps it is shorter and more derivative (uses
other sources when necessary to knit the story).  Maybe it should be on <b>Huffington Post</b> [where I also write] so
that it gets wider readership.<br /><br />

But I think it is what gives your voice gravitas and should be maintained, even if it
is a loss-leader to you. It is where you plant your flag.<br /></blockquote>Point well taken. <br /><br />I'm planning, for now, to resume posting, on a much more limited basis---perhaps once or twice a week. I'm not going to cover everything that interests me---only a few developments that seem particularly blogworthy. I will try to continue my more robust presence on <a href="http://twitter.com/CultureGrrl">Twitter</a>. But most importantly, I'm going to try to focus on paid journalistic gigs and on other professional relationships. I remain open to (but not optimistic about) invitations to blog for bucks.<br /><br />Speaking of which, alert readers may already have noticed that I have restored my "Donate" button to my middle column. Those of you who expressed regret about missing my "Last-Gasp Fund Drive" now have a chance to welcome <b>CultureGrrl</b> back! Donors of $10 or more will receive e-mailed notifications when new items are posted. (Those of you already on my Donor list are, of course, grandfathered.)<br /><br />Alas, I've not yet had a PBS gig, as my compassionate correspondent indicated, above (unless <a href="http://www.pbs.org/newshour/art/blog/2009/08/the-art-of-blogging-about-art.html">this website feature</a> counts). But I did get interviewed again today by <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2011/12/the_importance_of_art_blogging.html">Finnish TV1</a>. I think I should move to Helsinki!<br /><br />This time I was interviewed by the Washington-based U.S. correspondent for the Finnish Broadcasting Company's YLE News. (More about this conversation later.) <br /><br />For now, here are my new Scandinavian friends, posing in New York's Central Park against a backdrop that you all will recognize. (That's a microphone, not a featherduster, in the cameraman's right hand.)<br /><br /><img alt="FinnTV.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/FinnTV.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="375" width="500" /><br /><div><b>Left: Sven Lindahl, cameraman. Right: Olli-Pekka Sulasma, U.S. Correspondent, YLE News, Finnish Broadcasting Company</b><br /></div>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2012/02/the_return_of_culturegrrl_resu.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2012/02/the_return_of_culturegrrl_resu.html</guid>
            
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:26:54 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>My Huffington Post Piece on Renzo Piano&amp;#146s Gardner Museum Expansion</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<img alt="GardHawl.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/GardHawl.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="375" width="500" /><br /><b>An ebullient Anne Hawley, director of the Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum, speaking at the press preview for the expansion</b><br /><br />By sheer good luck, my drive back home from my visit to Salem, MA (where I <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204555904577163440971402190.html?mod=WSJ_ArtsEnt_LifestyleArtEnt_2">reviewed</a> for the <b>Wall Street Journal</b> the <a href="http://www.pem.org/exhibitions/135-shapeshifting_transformations_in_native_american_art">Shapeshifting</a> show at the Peabody Essex Museum) coincided with the press preview for <strong>Renzo Piano</strong>'s <a href="http://www.buildingproject.gardnermuseum.org/updates">expansion</a> of the Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum in Boston. <br /><br />As it happened, that press preview also coincided with the Jan. 11  <a href="http://www.thebostonchannel.com/r/30197124/detail.html">court date</a> in the case against <b>Whitey Bulger</b>, an alleged former Boston crime boss who <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2011/06/bulgergardner_speculation_on_w.html">some believe</a> might have something to say about the unsolved <a href="http://www.gardnermuseum.org/resources/theft">1990 theft</a> of 13 works (including three <b>Rembrandts</b> and a <b>Vermeer</b>) from the Gardner.<br /><br />In my just-posted <b>Huffington Post</b> appraisal---<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lee-rosenbaum/isabella-stewart-gardner-museum_b_1217346.html">Gardner Wander: The New, the Old, the Glass Bottleneck in Between</a>---I take you on a tour of the new and old building in words, images and a 13-minute video. This is my first HuffPost piece to be accorded a big photo banner and byline at the top of the <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/arts/">Huffington Post Arts</a> page.<br /><br />You'll hear director <b>Anne Hawley</b> and architect Piano speak in the new concert hall 
near the beginning of my video. At the end, you'll hear the Gardner's 
resident chamber orchestra rehearsing there. In between, you'll see the "glass bottleneck" that I refer to in the headline, and hear an extended riff on the Gardner's tapestries by <b>Oliver Tostmann</b>, curator of the collection.<br /><br />Although I've been critical about several of Piano's past museum expansions (<a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2006/05/pianissimo.html">High Museum</a>, <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2006/04/the_atrium_that_ate_the_morgan.html">Morgan Library and Museum</a>, <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2008/02/renzo_pianos_architecture_for.html">Los Angeles County Museum</a>, <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2009/06/virago_in_chicago_the_irrevere.html">Art Institute of Chicago</a>), I deemed this one to be "an appropriate solution to a pressing problem---the need to preserve 
Isabella's unique creation while providing the space and services that 
modern museum visitors expect and museum staffers need."<br /><br />Reasonable people will disagree. It's always controversial to attach a spiffy modern addition to a beloved historic building. Take a look and judge for yourself.<br /><br />One thing seemed clear. These key players apparently really enjoyed working together.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/GardTrio2.jpg"><img alt="GardTrio2.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/assets_c/2012/02/GardTrio2-thumb-375x415-21269.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="415" width="375" /></a><br />   <b>Left to right, in the new concert hall: Yasuhisa Toyota of Nagata Acoustics; Scott Nickrenz, the Gardner's music director; architect Renzo Piano</b>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2012/02/my_huffington_post_piece_on_re.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2012/02/my_huffington_post_piece_on_re.html</guid>
            
            
            <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:04:18 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Why is Philippe de Montebello Promoting Century 21 Stores?</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<img alt="PhilippCent.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/PhilippCent.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" width="500" height="281" /> <div><br />Actually, he's not. <br /><br />But, in a case of inadvertent (and unfortunate) product placement, the glass-walled Lincoln Center studio of New York's <b>WNET</b> (<b>Channel Thirteen</b>) overlooks (on the left) that discount clothing store, which supplanted a late, lamented Barnes &amp; Noble bookstore. <br /><br />The above photo is a screenshot from <b>Philippe de Montebello</b>'s <a href="http://www.nyc-arts.org/showclips/index/id/1">announcement</a> (with co-anchor <b>Paula Zahn</b>) that his "Sunday Arts" program, now renamed "NYC-ARTS," will move tomorrow to prime time---Thursdays at 8 p.m. Where's an appropriate backdrop when they really need one?<br /><br />Speaking of unfortunate placement, has anyone noticed this new sculptural installation at the Metropolitan Museum, smack between the ticket seller and the museum shop?<br /><br /><img alt="PhilippeBust.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/PhilippeBust.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" width="475" height="485" /><br /><br />That's a bust of the Met's former director, to the right of the entrance to the shop. Let's move in for a closer look:<br /><br /><img alt="PhilippeBust2.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/PhilippeBust2.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" width="360" height="491" /><br /><b>Angela Conner, "Philippe de Montebello," 2009, Gift of the Trustees Emeriti</b><br /><br />Do we really want to remember Philippe as the patron saint of museum commerce? Perhaps a more dignified setting can eventually be found.<br /><br />And speaking of the Met's ticket sellers, a cashier, responding to <b>CultureSpouse</b>'s query about the admission fee for seniors, cheerfully assured him that he could pay whatever he wanted. (For the record, he paid full senior.) <br /><br />So much for the Met's <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2006/07/the_times_shortchanges_the_met.html">"conscience-wounding"</a> cashiers. Now if only there were also a senior rate (or, better yet, pay-what-you-wish) for that pricey parking garage!<br /><br />Wait a minute! I'm <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2012/01/valedictory_post_thanks_from_c.html">not supposed to be</a> blogging (at least not till next week).<br /></div>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2012/02/why_is_philippe_de_montebello.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2012/02/why_is_philippe_de_montebello.html</guid>
            
            
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 14:56:59 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>New Fisk Appeal Request: Tennessee AG Again Defends Georgia O&#146Keeffe&amp;#146s &quot;Explicit Instructions&quot;</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<img alt="cooper.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/cooper.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="292" width="220" /><br /><b>Donor Intent Champion: Tennessee Attorney General Robert Cooper Jr.</b><br /><br />Okay, so I'm violating my <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2012/01/valedictory_post_thanks_from_c.html">no-blogging rule</a> twice in one day (<a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2012/01/wheres_culturegrrl.html">one hour</a>, actually). I break promises for important news.<br /><br />This just in from the Tennessee Attorney General's Office---a request  for permission from the State Supreme Court to appeal the <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2011/11/court_of_appeals_approves_fisk.html">Tennessee Court of Appeals decision</a> that would allow Fisk University to sell a half-share in its Stieglitz Colleciton to <b>Alice Walton</b>'s Crystal Bridges Museum of American Art, contrary to the written no-sale stipulation of donor <b>Georgia O'Keeffe</b>.<br /><br />I haven't read the whole <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/79902197/Fisk-Crystal-Bridges-Case-AG-s-Appeal-Request">52-page brief</a> yet, but the money quote is right at the beginning:<br /><br /><blockquote>The Attorney General urges this Court to...reaffirm the State's commitment to respect and follow a donor's intent and to confirm that any relief...must as closely as possible adhere to donor intent. This Court's guidance is needed not only to clarify this important question of law, upon which the ultimate disposition of the invaluable art collection at issue hinges, but also to convey a clear and unambiguous message to potential donors of gifts for the public benefit that Tennessee courts will not substitute their judgment in contravention of a donor's explicit instructions. <br /><br />Such a statement from this State's highest Court is necessary to avoid the chilling effect on future donor gifts created by the Court of Appeals' decision to ignore the donor's express intent in this case. Future donors of gifts for the public benefit must be assured that restrictive covenants they place on their gifts will be enforced; otherwise the public will be forever deprived of the benefit of many gifts.<br /></blockquote>I couldn't have said it better myself. You go, Super Cooper!]]></description>
            <link>http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2012/01/new_fisk_appeal_request_tennes.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2012/01/new_fisk_appeal_request_tennes.html</guid>
            
            
            <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:38:59 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Where&amp;#146s CultureGrrl?</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<img alt="Morton.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/Morton.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="375" width="500" /><br /><b>Name That Curator (and name that museum)!</b><br /><i>Photo taken Jan. 27 by Lee Rosenbaum</i><br /><br />I've been to DC and West Palm Beach, among other venues. But if you're not <a href="https://twitter.com/#%21/CultureGrrl">following me</a> on <b>Twitter</b>, you're not up to speed on some of what I've done lately and who I saw. (However, I haven't tweeted about my wide-ranging discussion with the person pictured above).<br /><br />You also don't know what I think about the Association of Art Museum Director's belated, just released report about its Jan. 15-18 mid-winter meeting: Don B. was admitted to the club (notwithstanding <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2011/12/aamds_issues_strong_statement.html">this</a>). <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2011/06/michael_taylor_leaves_the_park.html">Michael Taylor</a> got in, just as fast as you can say, "Fabulous Former Philly Curator." <br /><br />But wait a minute! Where's <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2010/03/dealer-to-director_more_on_why.html">Jeffrey</a>?<br />]]></description>
            <link>http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2012/01/wheres_culturegrrl.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2012/01/wheres_culturegrrl.html</guid>
            
            
            <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:35:04 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>My WSJ Piece on &quot;Shapeshifting&quot; at Peabody Essex: A Photo-and-Video Companion</title>
            <description><![CDATA[You can now read online my piece that will be on tomorrow's "Leisure &amp; Arts" page of the <b>Wall Street Journal</b>. <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB10001424052970204555904577163440971402190-lMyQjAxMTAyMDEwNzExNDcyWj.html?mod=wsj_share_email">Artifacts to Artworks</a> is my take on the Peabody Essex Museum's  <a href="http://www.pem.org/exhibitions/135-shapeshifting_transformations_in_native_american_art">Shapeshifting: Transformations in Native American Art</a>.<br /><br />Let me supplement this article with my own photographs illustrating the works that I discuss. Here's the "may not be suitable for children" piece that opens the show (and my article). It sure <i><b>looks</b></i> kid-friendly, until you step inside. Good luck trying to restrain your kids from entering this alluring "tipi":<br /><br /><img alt="PEMMonk.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/PEMMonk.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="500" width="375" /> <br /><b>Kent Monkman, "Théâtre de Cristal," 2007, Glenbow Museum, Alberta</b><br /><br />Projected on a fake buckskin rug beneath the tipi's chandelier is a savage silent-movie parody of old Hollywood Westerns. This homoerotic, full-frontal film fantasy bears a title that apparently was not fit for a family newspaper---"Group of Seven Inches." It begins with this romantic encounter between the artist's drag-queen alter ego (in stiletto heels) and two loin-clothed white men, one of whom is pictured below:<br /><br /><img alt="PEMMonkScr2.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/PEMMonkScr2.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="329" width="500" /><br /><br />But now let's move on. Here's the other "bookend" to the show, which alone occupies the final gallery:<br /><br /><img alt="PEMCeto.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/PEMCeto.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="421" width="500" /><br /><b>Brian Jungen, "Cetology," 2002, Vancouver Art Gallery</b><br /><br />Here's a close-up of the plastic chairs of which this "whale skeleton" is composed:<br /><br /><img alt="PEMCetChr.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/PEMCetChr.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="375" width="500" /><br /><br />This is the deerskin pouch that I described as  "ravishing":<br /><br /><img alt="PEMPouch.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/PEMPouch.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="485" width="425" /><br /><b>Northeastern artist, Pouch, late 1600s to mid-1700s, Peabody Essex Museum</b><br /><br />The PEM loses points, though, for displaying this masterpiece in such a way that you cannot see the equally beautiful (and conceptually important) decoration on the other side. I managed to slip my camera between the case and the wall, to bring you this blurry shot of the porcupine-quill embroidery that the <a href="http://pemshop.com/detail.aspx?ID=1410">catalogue</a> illustrates and describes as "double-curves [that] manifest the desire and necessity for balance in one's life":<br /><br /><img alt="PEMPouchBk.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/PEMPouchBk.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="480" width="350" /><br /><br />At the press preview, <b>Karen Kramer Russell</b>, the PEM's <b> </b>curator of Native American art and culture, described this Chilkat blanket from her own museum's collection as the oldest known example in the world:<br /><br /><img alt="PEMBlank.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/PEMBlank.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="459" width="500" /><br /><b>Chilkat Blanket, c. 1832, Peabody Essex Museum</b><br /><br />But wait a minute! Yesterday I saw this one at the Metropolitan Museum, which claims to be older!<br /><br /><img alt="MetChilBlkt.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/MetChilBlkt.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="410" width="500" /><br /><b>Chilkat Blanket, British Columbia, c. 1825, private collection (displayed at Metropolitan Museum of Art)</b><br /><br />Here's one of the strangest objects in the PEM's show, which, as I noted in my article, was one of many demonstrating the effect of cross-cultural influences on Native American artists. It has an Egyptian-inspired headdress and forelegs, and a Haida face:<br /><br /><img alt="PEMSphinx.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/PEMSphinx.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="487" width="400" /><br /><b>Simeon Stilthda, "Sphinx," c. 1875, British Museum</b><br /><br />Speaking of cross-cultural influences, Tlingit/Aleut artist <b>Nicholas Galanin</b>'s engrossing two-part dance video, "<i>Tsu Heidei Shugaxtutaan</i>" ("We Will Again Open This Container of Wisdom That Has Been Left in Our Care"), 2006, combines a traditional Tlingit song with modern dance in one clip, and contemporary electronic music with tribal dance in the other. <br /><br />Here's my conversation with Nicholas, as we viewed his piece together:<br /><br /><object style="height: 306px; width: 500px" width="500" height="306"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/G4DvfV48uAM?version=3&amp;feature=player_profilepage" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/G4DvfV48uAM?version=3&amp;feature=player_profilepage" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" height="306" width="500"></object><div><b><i>All photos and video by Lee Rosenbaum.</i></b><br /></div>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2012/01/my_wsj_piece_on_shapeshifting.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2012/01/my_wsj_piece_on_shapeshifting.html</guid>
            
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 18:46:23 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Coming Tomorrow: My WSJ Piece on Peabody Essex&#146s &quot;Shapeshifting&quot; Show</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<img alt="PEMRuss2.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/PEMRuss2.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="367" width="500" /><br /><b>Karen Kramer Russell, Peabody Essex Museum's curator of Native American art and culture, discussing a painted hide shield cover, Upper Missouri River, c. 1820, National Museum of Natural History, on display at the PEM's new "Shapeshifting" exhibition</b><br /><br />I'm still here, art-lings. And I do miss you (and the blog)!<br /><br />Your many notes of appreciation for <b>CultureGrrl</b> that I've received since deserting you have greatly moved me (sometimes almost to tears). I knew that some of you cared, but didn't know how many or how much! Only one donor took me up on my offer to refund contributions to my <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2011/12/reader_support_culturegrrls_ur.html">recent fund drive</a> that fell short of its goal (causing me to delete my "Donate" button and shift professional focus).<br /><br />Speaking of professional changes, I've now slightly fleshed out my <b>Linked In</b> <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/pub/lee-rosenbaum/18/369/479">profile</a>, which you can access by clicking the logo in the middle column. My entry into this everyone-is-connected world has been reluctant and slow: I'm one of the least social individuals ever to  (sort of) participate in social media. But I did experience the power of that world firsthand, when other Tweeters encouraged their followers to contribute to my fund drive. Thanks to all!<br /><br />Although I come from the old school of "writers are loners and are not entrepreneurs," I'm slowly learning new tricks. One of these days, I'll even get a smartphone. (But the NY Philharmonic <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/13/nyregion/ringing-finally-stopped-but-concertgoers-alarm-persists.html">marimba incident</a> did give me pause!)<br /><br />In any event, there's still some life in the old <b>CultureGrrl</b>: As I previously <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2012/01/valedictory_post_thanks_from_c.html">mentioned</a>, I'm going to link here to my mainstream-media work, and even flesh it out a bit upon occasion. And I encourage all of you to follow my tasty news-and-views tidbits on Twitter (<a href="https://twitter.com/#%21/CultureGrrl">@CultureGrrl</a>).<br /><br />Here's my first opportunity to reconnect with you on the blog: If all goes according to plan, the <b>Wall Street Journal</b>'s "Leisure &amp; Arts" page tomorrow will run my review of the just-opened <a href="http://www.pem.org/exhibitions/135-shapeshifting_transformations_in_native_american_art">Shapeshifting</a> show at the Peabody Essex Museum in Salem, MA. My piece should be online later today.<br /><br />I'll soon provide you with the link to that piece (with a raunchy beginning), and I'll post on <b>CultureGrrl</b> some photos of the works I discuss. As a bonus, I'll include my video interview with one of the artists, <b>Nicholas Galanin</b>, who attended the press preview.<br /><br />I fear that these two posts may cause me to backslide into blogoholism. Luckly I'll be, of necessity, away from my home computer for much of the next two weeks. (Should I leave the laptop home?)<br />]]></description>
            <link>http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2012/01/coming_tomorrow_my_wsj_piece_o.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2012/01/coming_tomorrow_my_wsj_piece_o.html</guid>
            
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 16:24:16 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Valedictory Post: Thanks from CultureGrrl!</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<img alt="DK&amp;Me2.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/DK%26Me2.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="216" width="214" /><br /><b><em>Photo © by Jill Krementz</em>
<br /></b><br />"Thanks from CultureGrrl" has been the subject-line in my recent e-mailed acknowledgements to some 44 supporters (both Repeat Donors and new ones) from 16 states, the District of Columbia and one foreign country (Finland). Individual generosity during my recent three-week fund drive ranged from $5 to $500. In all, I raised $1,945---just shy of my $2,000 goal. More than for the contributions, I am very grateful for the many notes of appreciation that accompanied them. <br /><br />I love you, art-lings, and will miss you. I cherish the bonds I've forged over the past five and a half years with my classy, savvy audience. But as you well know, I'm a stickler. I'm going to stick to my word and, effective today, take a break (possibly a permanent one) from blogging. <br /><br />In introducing my now concluded <b>Last-Gasp Fund Drive</b>, I <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2011/12/reader_support_culturegrrls_ur.html">wrote</a>:<br /><br /><blockquote><b><i>If </i><i>100 readers are willing to donate $20 each within the next three weeks</i></b> to express appreciation for last year's edition of <b>CultureGrrl</b>
 (or if a different combination of readers and benefactions achieves the
 same monetary goal), I'll continue....<br /><br />If I don't get this vote of 
confidence, I'm going to take off at least a month, beginning Jan. 9, to
 undergo blogging-addiction withdrawal and seek other opportunities. I 
don't know yet whether I'll relapse in February. But my month's hiatus 
isn't an empty threat; it's a promise.<br /></blockquote>My month's sabbatical may become a permanent one. I just don't know yet whether I can do without the instant gratification of telling stories that need to be told and expressing views that I feel need to be aired.<br /><br />But I've become a slave to the blog, and I'm eager to see what else may be out there for me---something I couldn't do while blogging, because I'm too much of a perfectionist. I labored much too long and hard every day, researching my posts and crafting my prose. If I'm going to continue doing this kind of work, I really should get paid.<br /><br />As one of my most generous repeat donors just wrote to me:<br /><br /><blockquote>I am a firm believer that artists, and arts journalists, should get paid for what they do.&nbsp; My least favorite phrase is "psychic compensation," which is the way artists have been exploited for years into doing work for free. <br /></blockquote>But no one "exploited" me. I freely (perhaps foolishly) chose to do this, and it did bring me a some speaking gigs and broadcast exposure that I would not otherwise have enjoyed. It raised my profile and made me semi-famous to a niche group of art aficionados. What's more, for the most part, I enoyed doing it. I thank <b>Doug McLennan</b> and his <b>ArtsJournal</b> for providing me a distinguished platform, in the company of some of the best arts bloggers in the "business."<br /><br />[Wait a minute! AJ's <b>Real Clear Arts</b> just <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/realcleararts/2012/01/skates-part-two.html">lifted</a> my original <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2011/11/still_thrill_10155-million_ham.html">Tobias Meyer/Richter photo</a>! Is this "appropriation art"? (By the time you read this, it may have been de-appropriated.) RCA credits the photo to Bui Gallery, but it's definitely one that I took and published Nov. 10 on <b>CultureGrrl</b>. (Did Bui "appropriate" it first?)]<br /><br />There are a number of balls that I'll be dropping this month---things on my blog's to-do list that won't get done. It's going to be hard going back to being mild-mannered mortal <b>Lee Rosenbaum</b>, writing about a few things, after being caped crusader <b>CultureGrrl</b>, opinionating on everything.<br /><i><b><br /></b></i>Looking forward, I'm ready, willing and able to take on paid journalistic projects (including paid blogging gigs), speaking engagements and teaching stints. You can contact me through the blog. I will continue to link on <b>CultureGrrl</b> to my mainstream-media work and perhaps I'll even provide on this site a little extra commentary and/or multimedia related to those articles or broadcasts.<br /><br />If I can't resist indulging my passion for online commentary, you may find me occasionally on <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lee-rosenbaum">Huffington Post</a>. And I'll likely continue to <a href="https://twitter.com/#%21/CultureGrrl">tweet</a> now and then, to let <b>CultureGrrl</b> followers know what I'm thinking and doing. <br /><br />Finally, for those of you who participated in the fund drive in anticipation of future posts (rather than in appreciation of past ones), here's my money-back offer: Just reply to my "Thanks from CultureGrrl" e-mail with one word---REFUND---and I'll click the "Issue refund" button on PayPal. I don't want anyone to feel cheated.<br /><br />Thanks, art-lings, for your intelligence, insights and appreciation, and for all our time together! <br />]]></description>
            <link>http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2012/01/valedictory_post_thanks_from_c.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2012/01/valedictory_post_thanks_from_c.html</guid>
            
            
            <pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 22:01:11 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>De Kooning, Degas, Donatello (to Bellini): Ambitious Loan Shows that Bucked the Permanent-Collection Trend---Part III</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<img alt="DegEntr.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/DegEntr.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="305" width="500" /><b><br />Entrance to Boston Museum of Fine Arts' current hit show</b> <br /><br />[Part I is <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2011/12/de_kooning_degas_donatello_to.html">here</a>; Part II is <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2012/01/de_kooning_degas_donatello_to_1.html">here</a>.]<br /><br /><a href="http://www.mfa.org/exhibitions/degas-and-nude">Degas and the Nude</a> at the Boston Museum of Fine Arts (to Feb. 5) is one of the most perfectly realized art-museum explorations of a complex subject that I've ever encountered. The initiator of this ambitious undertaking---curator <b>George T.M. Shackelford</b>---gets extra points for focusing on a theme that's an obvious choice for a major scholarly crowd-pleaser but that, unaccountably, no one (as far as George could determine) had tackled till now.<br /><br />This show is thoroughly multimedia, not only in its handheld audio 
and video enhancements, but, more importantly, in the old-fashioned 
sense---extensive representation of all the media in which the artist worked: drawings, 
monotypes, sculpture (including a large array of bronzes cast from his wax models of dancers), paintings and, of course, the ravishing pastels 
for which he is perhaps most celebrated.<br /><br />Much richer than a conventional chronological retrospective, "Degas" makes telling comparisons within the artist's own oeuvre, including, perhaps for  the first time, juxtapositions of monotypes with their corresponding pastels. <br /><br />Here is one of the pastels for which the corresponding monotype is displayed:<br /><br /><img alt="DegPast.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/DegPast.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="445" width="325" /><br /><b>"Nude Combing Her Hair," c. 1877-80, pastel over monotype in black ink on paper, private collection, Chicago, Courtesy Museum of Fine Arts, Boston
</b><br /><br />The show goes beyond typical retrospectives with its sampling of astutely selected works by artists who influenced 
Degas---<b>Ingres</b>, <b>Delacroix</b>, <b>Goya</b>, <b>Puvis de Chavannes</b>---and by later admirers whom he influenced---<b>Bonnard</b>, <b>Gauguin</b>, <b>Picasso</b>, <b>Matisse</b>:<br /><br /><img alt="DegMat.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/DegMat.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="451" width="330" /><br /><b>Matisse, "Carmelina," 1903, Museum of Fine Arts, Boston<br />
© 2011 Succession H. Matisse, Paris/Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York<br />Photograph © Museum of Fine Arts, Boston
 </b><br /><br />In this context, I can now more fully appreciate why Shackelford felt irresistibly <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2011/09/boston_mfa_to_purchase_cailleb.html">tempted</a> to <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2011/09/boston_mfa_purchases_caillebot.html">deaccession</a> eight works from the BMFA's collection (including three with significant exhibition histories) to purchase this one---a prominently installed non-Degas, which is one of the exhibition's showstoppers:<br /><br /><a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/BMFABath.jpg"><img alt="BMFABath.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/assets_c/2011/09/BMFABath-thumb-300x412-20536.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="412" width="300" /></a><br /><b>Gustave Caillebotte, "Man at His Bath," 1884, Museum of Fine Arts, Boston</b><br /><br />It's a luminous tour de force, not as much for the candid but (to me) disappointing depiction of male flesh as for the alluring sheen of the tub and the luxuriant, lovingly detailed renderings of crumpled fabrics and well-worn boots (the latter on the left, below the chair). None of this is adequately conveyed in the above photo. The painting, in apparently pristine condition, is (like everything else in the show) perfectly lit, so its glistening brushstrokes appear still wet. <br /><br />The Caillebotte is also a reminder that the only male nudes we've seen from Degas came as something of a surprise, at the very beginning of the show. His early academic studies of male nudes from live models or other artists' works (including a study of <b>Michelangelo</b>'s "Bound Slave") are classically sensual, in sharp contrast to the mature Degas' awkwardly posed females, caught unawares from behind (as is Caillebotte's spread-eagled "Man"). <br /><br />We could make some Freudian guesses here about Degas' famously ambiguous sexuality, but Boston's exhibition (unlike two other Degas shows I've seen, curated by <b>Richard Kendall</b>, who discusses Degas' possible impotence and/or celibacy) doesn't really go there.<br /><br />The importance to the show  of Caillebotte (who bequeathed his own collection of his friend's nudes-in-pastel to the French State---its first acquisitions of Degas) is underscored by the curators' suggestion that the "unabashed realism" of works like "Man at His Bath" may have helped inspire Degas to begin a monumental (but unfinished) painting of a similar subject (toweling off after a bath), installed beside the Caillebotte:<br /><br /><img alt="DegDry.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/DegDry.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="351" width="500" /><br /><b>"Nude Woman Drying Herself," 1884-92, Brooklyn Museum, Courtesy Brooklyn Museum and Museum of Fine Arts, Boston</b><br /><br />In their reviews of Boston's show, some critics have come across as direct descendants of the scandalized scribes from Degas' own day---describing his nudes as <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/21/arts/design/degas-and-the-nude-at-museum-of-fine-arts-boston-review.html?ref=design#">cruel</a> (<b>Karen Rosenberg</b>, <b>NY Times</b>), or <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/arts/critics/artworld/2011/10/17/111017craw_artworld_schjeldahl">misogynistic</a> (<b>Peter Schjeldahl</b>, <b>New Yorker</b>). His female nudes are often awkward, caught in private, ungainly movements. In other words, they're real women, not rarefied beauties flattered in fetching poses. Degas' best works are astonishing for their unsparingly candid, very modern realism. His gaze was intensely voyeuristic, but not misogynistic.<br /><br />The critic who best appreciated these nuances was <b>Sebastian Smee</b> of the <b>Boston Globe</b>. He <a href="http://www.boston.com/ae/theater_arts/articles/2011/10/05/mfas_degas_and_the_nude_exhibit_offers_a_candid_look_at_degas/?page=full">stated</a>:<br /><br /><blockquote>If you come to the show with an image of Degas as the painter of pretty 
ballerinas and horse track scenes, be prepared to find something 
tougher. If, on the other hand, you come with your defenses up---convinced that Degas, along with being an anti-Semite, was also a 
misogynist---prepare to have these defenses weakened.<br /></blockquote>The artist's voyeurism is laid bare in his early brothel monotypes, whose frankness still shocks. This is one of the tamer examples:<br /><br /><img alt="DegClient.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/DegClient.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="389" width="300" /><br /><b>"The Serious Client," 1876-77, National Gallery of Canada, Ottawa<br />Photo © National Gallery of Canada, Courtesy Museum of Fine Arts, Boston</b><br /><br />Also <a href="http://www.clarkart.edu/exhibitions/picasso-degas/content/brothel-scenes.cfm">featured</a> in the Clark Art Institute's 2010 "Picasso Looks at Degas" exhibition (co-curated by Kendall), these tawdry morsels weren't intended for public consumption and were "largely unknown until after [Degas'] death," according to Boston's wall text for "The Body Exploited."<br /><br />But Degas' oeuvre is not only about overturning conventional notions of female beauty. By the time we get to the 1880s, we're swooning in aesthetic ecstasy amidst the jewel-like, dazzlingly dappled, highly finished pastels of bathers that "constitute one of his highest achievements as an artist," as the curators tell us:<br /><br /><img alt="DegToil.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/DegToil.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="487" width="425" /><br /><b>"La Toilette," 1884-86, private collection, Courtesy Museum of Fine Arts, Boston</b><br /><br /><img alt="DegTub.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/DegTub.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="365" width="500" /><br /><b>"The Tub," 1886, Musée d'Orsay<br />© Photo Musée d'Orsay/rmn, Courtesy Museum of Fine Arts, Boston</b><br /><br />All credit goes to the curators, especially George Shackelford, now <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2011/07/bmfas_shackelford_steps_up_to.html">moving on</a> to the senior deputy directorship of the Kimbell Art Museum from his BMFA posts as chair of European art and curator of modern art. (As part of the Fort Worth museum's musical chairs, <b>Malcolm Warner</b>, after 10 years at the Kimbell as senior curator, deputy director and acting director, has also <a href="http://lagunaartmuseum.org/laguna-art-museum-announces-executive-director">moved on</a>, effective this week, to the executive directorship of the Laguna Art Museum.) <br /><br />Shackelford conceived "Degas" more than three years ago, enlisting the ideal co-conspirator (and co-curator)---<b>Xavier Rey</b>, curator of paintings, Musée d'Orsay. The Paris museum (to which the show will travel, Mar. 12-July 1) is the largest single lender, with more than 60 of the 160 works culled from 50 international sources.<br /><br />As one who has <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2006/05/curators_of_the_world_unite.html">long argued</a> that curators should get a "byline" in an exhibition's wall text, I was pleasantly surprised by the well-earned acknowledgement of Shackelford's authorship in the introductory panel. May he extend the same courtesy to curators at the Kimbell, and long live this laudable practice at the BMFA!<br /><br /><img alt="DegNudWall.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/DegNudWall.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="449" width="375" /><br /><b>Curatorial Star Turn: George </b><b>Shackelford</b><b>'s signed introductory wall text (with photograph) for "Degas and the Nude"<br /><br /></b>For the exhibition's online slideshow, go <a href="http://www.mfa.org/media/detail/2117/148">here</a>. For its catalogue, go <a href="http://www.mfa.org/collections/publications/degas-and-nude">here</a>.<br /><br /><b><i>And now, art-lings, a personal note</i>:</b> Shackelford's swansong at the BMFA is, as it happens, <b>CultureGrrl</b>'s swansong too. My three-week <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2011/12/reader_support_culturegrrls_ur.html">Last-Gasp Fund Drive</a> has concluded. As promised, I'll be announcing here on Monday the results of my fundraising appeal and my future plans.]]></description>
            <link>http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2012/01/de_kooning_degas_donatello_to_3.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2012/01/de_kooning_degas_donatello_to_3.html</guid>
            
            
            <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 14:00:38 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Dept. of Bad Taste: Making Light of Attack on Art at Clyfford Still Museum</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<img alt="StillPunch.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/StillPunch.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="363" width="500" /><br /><b>Suffering damage: "1957-J-No. 2," Clyfford Still Museum</b><br /><br />Perhaps I shouldn't be surprised by the many commentators who seem to be finding cause for merriment in the sad damage done last Friday to a painting at the new <b>Clyfford Still</b> Museum, Denver.<br /><br />But AAMD?!?<br /><br />First, the backstory. <b>Joey Bunch</b> of the <b>Denver Post</b> <a href="http://www.denverpost.com/breakingnews/ci_19675102?source=pkg">reported this yesterday</a>:<br /><br /><blockquote><span id="redesign_default">A 36-year-old Denver woman, apparently 
drunk, leaned against an iconic Clyfford Still painting worth more than 
$30 million last week, punched it, slid down it and urinated on herself,
 according to a criminal case against Carmen Lucette Tisch.</span><br /></blockquote>Here's what someone representing the Association of Art Museum Directors <a href="https://twitter.com/#%21/MuseumDirectors/status/155010696051040258">tweeted</a> today:<br /><img alt="AAMDTweet.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/AAMDTweet.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="233" width="500" /><br />There's nothing wrong with <b>Art in America</b>'s straightforward headline. But to answer AAMD's question: Yes, I'd say it's wrong for the nation's preeminent professional organization for art museums to "love it."<br /><br />Not "loving it" is the Clyfford Still Museum. Here's its statement, issued today:<br /><br /><blockquote>On Dec.29, 2011, an incident of criminal mischief took place at the Clyfford Still &nbsp;Museum. The police were summoned and the offender was arrested and is currently in police custody. Museum officials are cooperating with the authorities regarding the situation and are in the process of further assessing the incident. <br /><br />The Clyfford Still Museum maintains the highest standard of security; our security officers acted swiftly and appropriately; the police were summoned immediately and the offender was taken into custody within minutes of the incident. We regularly evaluate our security procedures in order to protect both the Still collection and our visitors.<br /><br />   

The painting involved in the incident is still being assessed, and our initial evaluations indicate that it can be treated and returned to public exhibition. Early estimated treatment cost is in the range of $10,000. Since opening in November, the Clyfford Still Museum has welcomed thousands of visitors who have enjoyed the collection and acted respectfully and appropriately.<br /><br />

This extremely rare and random act of criminal mischief is highly deplorable; however, it will not deter us from performing our mission and continuing to provide a world-class art experience to our visitors.</blockquote>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2012/01/dept_of_bad_taste_making_light.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2012/01/dept_of_bad_taste_making_light.html</guid>
            
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 22:00:31 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>De Kooning, Degas, Donatello (to Bellini): Ambitious Loan Shows that Bucked the Permanent-Collection Trend---Part II</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/Elderfield.jpg"><img alt="Elderfield.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/assets_c/2012/01/Elderfield-thumb-350x303-21158.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="303" width="350" /></a><br /><b>De Kooning Devotee: John Elderfield, chief curator emeritus of painting and sculpture, Museum of Modern Art</b><br /><br />[Part I is <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2011/12/de_kooning_degas_donatello_to.html">here</a>.]<br /><br />Just when I was feeling the old art-exhibition ennui, 2011's two standout U.S. blockbusters---<b>John Elderfield</b>'s <a href="http://www.moma.org/interactives/exhibitions/2011/dekooning/">de Kooning: A Retrospective</a> at the Museum of Modern Art (to Jan. 9), and <b>George Shackelford</b>'s and (from the Musée d'Orsay, Paris) <b>Xavier Rey</b>'s <a href="http://www.mfa.org/exhibitions/degas-and-nude">Degas and the Nude</a> at the Boston Museum of Fine Arts (to Feb. 5)---gave me a welcome rush. They epitomized for me the spontaneous combustion that occurs when great material is ignited by a brilliant curatorial spark.<br /><br />At "de Kooning," once I got past the exploratory early works, I gazed around each new segment in this chronological agglomeration thinking, "This is my favorite period"..."No, <b>THIS</b> is my favorite period..." <br /><br />I came upon each painting that had been loaned by a New York museum as a dear, intimately known old friend, making me realize just how much time I had spent spellbound by <b>Willem de Kooning</b>'s works in previous encounters.<br /><br />Careening through the fast-moving periods of de Kooning's fluidly morphing oeuvre, the show ricochets from one climax...<br /><br /><img alt="DKExcav.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/DKExcav.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="407" width="500" /><br /><b>"Excavation," 1950, Art Institute of Chicago<br /></b><br />to another...<br /><br /><img alt="DKMerritt.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/DKMerritt.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="484" width="430" /><br /><b>"Merritt Parkway," 1959, Detroit Institute of Arts<br /></b><br />...to another:<br /><br /><img alt="DKWater.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/DKWater.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="441" width="500" /><br /><b>"...Whose Name Was Writ in Water," 1975, Guggenheim Museum<br /></b><br />But like most great exhibitions, "de Kooning" boasts a drop-dead "power wall"---a lineup of masterworks that pack a transcendent visual and visceral wallop. This array of five iconic de Kooning women, with MoMA's own Mama ("Woman I," 1950-52) anchoring the middle, is everyone's idea of a surefire showstopper:<br /><br /><img alt="DKWomen.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/DKWomen.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="226" width="500" /><br /><br />The Guggenheim picture in the photograph just above this buxom bevy is part of another "power wall"---lusciously painted gestural abstractions from the '70s---whose sum is more than its considerable parts. (The Guggenheim's "...Water" is second from the left.)<br /><br /><img alt="DK70s.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/DK70s.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="239" width="500" /><br /><br />But then, there's the controversial late work, where de Kooning's gloriously dense, audaciously hued, aggressively messy paintings abruptly become spare and stripped down:<br /><br /><img alt="DKLate.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/DKLate.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="294" width="500" /><br /><br />When asked at the show's Sept.13 press preview about what he describes in the <a href="https://www.momastore.org/museum/moma/ProductDisplay_de%20Kooning:%20A%20Retrospective_10451_10001_117582_-1_26683_11492_114553">catalogue</a> as the "White Paintings," Elderfield declared that <b>Gary Garrels</b>' traveling survey of <a href="http://www.moma.org/interactives/exhibitions/1997/dekooning/index.html">Willem de Kooning: The Late Paintings</a> (which had opened in 1995 at the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art and traveled to MoMA in 1997, coordinated by <b>Robert Storr</b>) had decisively put to rest any doubts about the authorship of these wispy candy-colored confections, said to have been executed by the declining de Kooning. In the wall text, Elderfield goes so far as to hype these '80s works as "the grand finale of his artistic career." <br /><br />Pesky skeptics have suggested that the "late de Kooning" may have owed more to obliging studio assistants than to the artist himself---a theory that MoMA seems to want to put to rest, yet again, through an <a href="http://www.moma.org/explore/inside_out/2012/01/02/a-way-of-seeing">online feature</a>, posted Monday on the museum's website, by artist <b>Tom Ferrara</b>, de Kooning's assistant in East Hampton from 1979-87. But the four photos that Ferrara posts---even the one titled, "Willem de Kooning working"---never show him actually applying paint to canvas.<br /><br />Nevertheless, in their definitive, Pulitzer Prize-winning biography, <a href="http://www.randomhouse.com/book/173126/de-kooning-by-mark-stevens-and-annalyn-swan">de Kooning: An American Master</a> (which features on its back cover a detail from the same <b>Arnold Newman</b> photograph that appears on the back cover of Elderfield's catalogue), <b>Mark Stevens</b> and <b>Annalyn Swan</b> note that a 1984 movie made by <b>Conrad Fried</b> (the younger brother of de Kooning's wife, <b>Elaine</b>) showed the artist "drawing on the fresh canvas" and applying "one of his whiplash lines to the canvas." <br /><br />The authors, who noted that Elaine had "an obvious incentive to establish a strong market" for the late work, assert that "what seemed to have happened with de Kooning...was that his ability to transcend short-term memory loss by drawing upon something deeper and more instinctual carried him until the mid-eighties. It helped that, in his final paintings, he moved toward drawing, his most instinctive gift."<br /><br />Maybe so. But even Stevens and Swan note that when Fried returned in 1986 to shoot another film of the artist at work, de Kooning's "concentration was obviously slipping" and "as the year 1986 progressed, ...that dance was over: the brushstroke had lost its partners. His canvases no longer seemed to breath in the same way. He was filling the space between lines, rather than animating the entire surface."<br /><br />When I viewed the late-paintings show at MoMA in 1997, I had been totally convinced and deeply moved by what seemed to me as 
the ethereal other-worldliness of de Kooning's final paintings. But seeing them again, in the context of Elderfield's exhaustive retrospective, un-convinced me.<br /><br />One thing you notice when going through MoMA's majesterial installation (which I did three times) is how one period leads to the next. You can see the less successful transitional works that mark a leave-taking of one played-out period and a tentative approach towards something excitingly new:<br /><br /><img alt="DKWoman6.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/DKWoman6.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="447" width="400" /><br /><b>"Woman VI," 1953, Carnegie Museum of Art (close to, but not part of, the "power wall")</b><br /><br />Elderfield tried to make the case for a similar progression leading up to the late oeuvre, with a few supposedly transitional works preceding the final gallery. But their connection to the new phase seemed slight and strained. The curator also echoed the biographers' argument (based on the writings of the keenly perceptive neurologist, <b>Oliver Sacks</b>) that people with dementia sometimes still perform surprisingly well in their areas of greatest proficiency.<br /><br />From my own personal knowledge of people with dementia (including an accomplished pianist who continued to play complex jazz arrangements, but without his former interpretive and improvisational flair), I found it hard to believe that a notoriously, gloriously messy artist suddenly shifted gears to paint crisply defined shapes, modeled with delicate shading and tapered to fine points. I also doubted that someone in his condition would possess the fine-motor skills for such finesse.<br /><br />I especially admired one work in the final gallery, until I closely examined the improbable delicacy of the wispy lines, the elegant tapering, and the subtle shading of the orange and yellow volumes. Could the diminished de Kooning really have done this? It became harder and harder to suspend disbelief:<br /><br /><img alt="DKFish.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/DKFish.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="439" width="500" /><br /><b>"Untitled XIX," 1983, Doris and Donald Fisher Collection</b><br /><br />The show's final, <b><i>very</i></b> late de Kooning seemed chosen as much for the validation imparted by its renowned Pop artist-owner as for its possibly tenuous connection to the lionized Abstract Expressionist:<br /><br /><img alt="DKCatsM.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/DKCatsM.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="478" width="425" /><br /><b>"The Cat's Meow," 1987, Jasper Johns Collection</b><br /><br />None of my misgivings at the exit, however, detracted from the overall sense of joy and gratitude conferred by experiencing this brilliantly orchestrated, incisively explicated (soon to close) retrospective---one of the great highlights of a lifetime spent savoring superlative museum shows.<br /><br />[I hope to discuss the BMFA's "Degas" in a future post.]<br /><i><br />Photographs by Lee Rosenbaum</i><br />]]></description>
            <link>http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2012/01/de_kooning_degas_donatello_to_1.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2012/01/de_kooning_degas_donatello_to_1.html</guid>
            
            
            <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 12:25:52 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>New Boston Tea Party: MFA&#146s Malcolm Rogers vs. &quot;Payment in Lieu of Taxes&quot;</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<img alt="Rogers_edited.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/Rogers_edited.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="240" width="250" /><br /><b>Malcolm Rogers, director, Boston Museum of Fine Arts</b><br /><br />There's a misleading, mistaken assumption in <b>J<strong>udith Dobrzynski</strong></b>'s <strong>Real Clear Arts</strong> blog yesterday that needs to be corrected. <br /><br />In her <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/realcleararts/2012/01/boston-fee-wheres-aamd.html">most recent post</a>, Judith decries the Association of Art Museum Directors' failure to issue an immediate, forceful statement opposing Boston's planned increase in "payments in lieu of taxes" (PILOT) that the city government asks Boston's major nonprofits to pay.<br /><br />Dobrzynski writes: <br /><br /><blockquote>The Mayor of Boston, <b>Thomas Menino</b>, is sharply raising the fee 
many nonprofits, including museums, <i><b>must pay</b></i> [emphasis added] to the city in lieu of 
taxes. <br /></blockquote>There is, in fact, no requirement for nonprofits to make these payments. <a href="http://articles.boston.com/2011-10-28/lifestyle/30332963_1_nonprofits-property-tax-higher-tax-bill">Every</a> <a href="http://articles.boston.com/2011-04-24/news/29469294_1_major-nonprofits-organizations-voluntary-payments">article</a> and <a href="http://www.cityofboston.gov/Images_Documents/PILOT_Task%20Force%20_ExecutiveSummary_tcm3-16644.pdf">every</a> <a href="http://www.cityofboston.gov/Images_Documents/PILOT_%20Task%20Force%20Final%20Report_WEB%20_tcm3-21904.pdf">city report</a> that's been written about PILOT (including the <a href="http://www.theartnewspaper.com/articles/Dont-kill-the-goose/25331">Art Newspaper piece</a> Dobrzynski cites, written by <b>Malcolm Rogers</b>, director of the Boston Museum of Fine Arts) clearly states that these payments are "voluntary." They are <b><i>not</i></b>, as Judith suggests, directly analogous to Pennsylvania's widely lambasted, never enacted<a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2009/10/pennsylvania_stories_barnes_pl.html"> proposed 8% sales tax</a> on admissions to performances, museums and zoos. Boston's PILOT is <b><i>not</i></b> (as the PA sales tax would have been) a compulsory levy: If Malcolm doesn't want to pay, he doesn't have to (although, as discussed below, there could be consequences).<br /><br />The <b>Boston Globe</b>'s <strong>Michael Rezendes</strong> last April <a href="http://articles.boston.com/2011-04-24/news/29469294_1_major-nonprofits-organizations-voluntary-payments">reported</a> these details about the city's ramped up PILOT program:<br /><br /><blockquote>For the first time, Boston's major tax-exempt institutions---its premier hospitals, universities, and cultural centers---are being asked to make regular voluntary payments to the city <b><i>based on the value of their property</i></b> [emphasis added] to help offset the rising cost of city services and cuts in state financial aid.<br /><br />

Although many of the city's nonprofit organizations have been making so-called Payments In Lieu of Taxes for decades, this marks a major change to a system that feels to some organizations uncomfortably close to tax bills. Boston officials recently mailed letters to leaders at 40 major nonprofits asking them to pay up to 25 percent of what they would owe if their property were not tax-exempt....<br /><br />it is designed to gradually increase annual financial payments to the 
city by the major tax-exempt organizations from the $15 million they 
paid this year to $48 million over a five-year ramp-up period.<br /></blockquote>Each of the nonprofits targeted by the PILOT program could get a reduction of up to 50 percent of its recommended property-based payment, as a credit for community benefits offered by the institution, according to the <a href="http://www.cityofboston.gov/Images_Documents/PILOT_%20Task%20Force%20Final%20Report_WEB%20_tcm3-21904.pdf">Final Report</a> of the Mayor's PILOT Task Force.<br /><br />Although AAMD has not yet publicly weighed in on this controversy, <b>Ford Bell</b>, president of the American Association of Museums, has stepped up to the plate and taken a swing. He is <a href="http://www.theartnewspaper.com/articles/This-is-not-a-tax-says-Bostons-mayor/25330">quoted</a> by <b>Erica Cooke </b>of the <b>Art Newspaper</b>:<br /><br /><blockquote>To say, "Now we
 are going to tax them, but we're not going to call it a tax" is very 
disingenuous.<br /></blockquote>Cooke observes that "to say 'no' would risk the good working 
relationship that many of these not-for-profits have with the city of 
Boston." <br /><br />Maybe so. And maybe AAMD, fearing the slippery slope of a tax-that's-not-called-a-tax, should take a stand against the insidious erosion of museums' tax-exempt status. <br /><br />But Rogers has already risked his "good working relationship" with the city by taking his beef to the press. Perhaps a more effective strategy would be spearheading a frank but cordial discussion between city officials (including Mayor Menino)<b> </b>and the entire group of affected institutions---cultural, educational, and others---seeking consensus, not confrontation.<br /><br />The city has a stake in a robust nonprofit sector; the nonprofits have a stake in a financially viable city. Better that they open the lines of communication to work together for mutual benefit, rather than wrestle in public.<br /><br />"In devising this plan, the task force never sought the input of any of the city's cultural institutions," Rogers wrote in the Art Newspaper. Indeed, no representatives of cultural nonprofits were included on the <a href="http://www.cityofboston.gov/Images_Documents/PILOT_Members_tcm3-8010.pdf">Mayor's PILOT Task Force</a> that recommended the controversial changes.<br /><br />It's time, belatedly, to correct this serious oversight. After all, wasn't the Boston Tea Party all about "taxation without representation"? <br /><br />Wait a minute! Malcolm's a native Brit. Is this poetic justice, Revolutionary War Division?<br />]]></description>
            <link>http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2012/01/boston_mfas_malcolm_rogers_vs.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2012/01/boston_mfas_malcolm_rogers_vs.html</guid>
            
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 00:06:04 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>The Year in CultureGrrl, 2011 Edition</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<img alt="CrysCherry1.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/CrysCherry1.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="600" width="500" /><br /><b>CultureGrrl's Wild Ride: Me, aloft in a cherrypicker last May, at the in-construction Crystal Bridges Museum of American Art</b><br /><br />This annual feature (<a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2011/01/the_year_in_culturegrrl_2010_e.html">here</a>, <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2009/12/the_year_in_culturegrrl_2009_e.html">here</a>, <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2008/12/the_year_in_culturegrrl_2008.html">here</a>, <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2007/12/the_year_in_culturegrrl_2007.html">here</a> and <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2006/12/the_year_in_culturegrrl.html">here</a>) has special poignancy for me this year. That's because, with the sputtering (after a strong start) of my three-week <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2011/12/reader_support_culturegrrls_ur.html">Last-Gasp Fund Drive</a> (ending this Friday at 2 p.m.), this 2011 Edition may well be the last.<br /><br />So in the retrospective spirit in the season, and looking forward to fulfilling my new professional resolutions in 2012, here are <b>CultureGrrl's Top 20 Stories </b>(plus one)<b> for 2011</b>, in chronological order, with an emphasis on the controversies that we've been following:<br /><a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2011/01/pafas_ditzy_deaccessions_what.html"></a><br /><a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2011/01/my_huffington_post_interview_w.html">My Huffington Post Interview with Smithsonian Secretary G. Wayne Clough</a><br /><a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2011/03/metube_clyfford_still_museum_s.html">Clyfford Still Museum Circumvents Donor Intent (CultureGrrl Circumnavigates Construction Site)</a><br /><a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2011/04/directors_hideseek_revelations.html">Director's "Hide/Seek" Revelations: What REALLY Happened; What Won't Happen Again</a><br /><a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2011/05/crystal_bridges_director_on_fi.html">Crystal Bridges' Director on Fisk Art-Sale Controversy: "We don't need that collection."</a><br /><a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2011/05/met_at_the_whitney_moma_at_fol.html">Museum Musical Chairs: Met at the Whitney; MoMA at Folk Art---Part I</a> and <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2011/05/the_met_at_the_whitney.html">Part II</a><br /><a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2011/05/nys_regents_pass_stringent_dea.html">News Flash: NYS Regents Pass Stringent Deaccession Regulations (finally!)</a><br /><a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2011/05/rotten_soft_diplomacy_ai_weiwe.html">Rotten "Soft Diplomacy": Ai Weiwei's Plight and U.S. Museums' Appeasement</a><br /><a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2011/06/invigorated_by_investigators_a.html">Invigorated by Investigators: Adventures at the IRE Conference (plus video from my panel)</a><br /><a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2011/07/folk_art_museums_bad-news_day.html">Folk Art Museum's Bad-News Day: Sale to MoMA Consummated, Disgraced Patron Sentenced</a><br /><a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2011/08/lewis_reverberations_carlos_mu.html">Lewis Stew: Carlos Museum's Belated, Inadequate Disclosure of 19 Gifts from Indicted Collector</a><br /><a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2011/09/911_memorial_dispiriting_desig.html">9/11 Memorial Photo Essay: Dispiriting Design, Stark Ambiance</a><br /><a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2011/09/boston_mfa_purchases_caillebot.html">Boston MFA Purchases Caillebotte's Male Nude, Denudes its Permanent Collection</a><br /><a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2011/09/national_academy_resurrected_a.html">Q&amp;A with Carmine Branagan: National Academy Resurrected after Near-Death Experience, Director Unrepentant</a><br /><a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2011/10/vereshchagin_chagrin_russian_r.html">Vereshchagin Chagrin: Russian Realist the New Deaccession Sensation</a><br /><a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2011/11/crystal_bridges_gazing_touring.html">Crystal Bridges Gazing: Video Tour of Alice Walton's New Museum--Part I</a> and <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2011/11/crystal_bridges_gazing_video_t.html">Part II</a><br /><a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2011/11/crystal_bridges_accounting_how.html">Crystal Bridges Accounting: How Much Did Alice's Palace Cost?</a><br /><a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2011/12/crystal_bridges_accounting_how_1.html">Crystal Bridges Accounting: How Much Did the Art Cost?</a><br /><a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2011/12/knoedler_curdler_lessons_from.html">Knoedler Curdler: Lessons to be Gleaned from the Authenticity Allegations</a><br /><a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2011/12/crystal_bridges_challenge_the.html">Crystal Bridges Challenge: Molding Moshe Safdie's Arki-tecture into Art-chitecture</a><br /><a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2011/12/explaining_the_bomford_bombshe.html">Explaining the Bomford Bombshell: My Q&amp;A with Michael Brand, Getty Museum's Ex-Director</a><br /><br />I'll end this selective round-up with a bittersweet bonus-link to my <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2011/12/the_importance_of_art_blogging.html">Finnish television debut</a>, in which I vaingloriously extolled the importance of art blogging in general and <b>CultureGrrl</b> in particular, while privately contemplating my blog's imminent demise. The title of that segment (in Finnish) was: "Art Bloggers Are Coming!" <br /><br />It should probably have been: "Art Blogger is Leaving!"]]></description>
            <link>http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2012/01/the_year_in_culturegrrl_2011_e.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2012/01/the_year_in_culturegrrl_2011_e.html</guid>
            
            
            <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 13:33:26 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>De Kooning, Degas, Donatello (to Bellini): Ambitious Loan Shows that Bucked the Permanent-Collection Trend---Part I (with video)</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/DKClam.jpg"><img alt="DKClam.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/assets_c/2011/12/DKClam-thumb-120x165-21106.jpg" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0 20px 20px 0;" height="165" width="120" /></a> <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/DegasBr.jpg"><img alt="DegasBr.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/assets_c/2011/12/DegasBr-thumb-130x233-21108.jpg" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0 20px 20px 0;" height="233" width="130" /></a><a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/RenPorDon.jpg"><img alt="RenPorDon.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/assets_c/2011/12/RenPorDon-thumb-200x194-21104.jpg" class="mt-image-center" style="float: center; margin: 0 0 20px 20px;" height="194" width="200" /></a><br /><br /><br /><b>Left to right: De Kooning, "Clam Digger," 1972, private collection<br />Degas, "Dancer Looking at the Sole of her Right Foot," modeled between 1896-1911, cast between 1921-31, Musée d'Orsay, Paris<br />Donatello, "Reliquary Bust of Saint Rossore," c. 1425, Museo Nationale di San Matteo, Pisa</b><br /><br />The Big D's---<b>De Kooning</b>, <b>Degas</b>, <b>Donatello</b> (et al.)---bucked the museum trend this year towards permanent-collection agglomerations, small dossier displays and single-lender shows. The "D" trio, to me, were welcome throwbacks to the extravagant blockbusters of fond memory---sprawling affairs where distinguished curators got free rein to identify, gather, study and explicate great masterpieces drawn from international sources.<br /><br />I had the highest of expectations for all three---<b>John Elderfield</b>'s "<a href="http://www.moma.org/interactives/exhibitions/2011/dekooning/">De Kooning: A Retrospective</a>" at the Museum of Modern Art (to Jan. 9); <b>George Shackelford</b>'s and (from the Musée d'Orsay, Paris) <b>Xavier Rey</b>'s <a href="http://www.mfa.org/exhibitions/degas-and-nude">Degas and the Nude</a> at the Boston Museum of Fine Arts (to Feb. 5) and the latest entrant into the megashow sweepstakes, <b>Keith Christiansen</b>'s and (from the Gemäldegalerie, Berlin) <strong>Stefan Weppelmann</strong>'s <a href="http://www.metmuseum.org/exhibitions/listings/2011/the-renaissance-portrait-from-donatello-to-bellini">The Renaissance Portrait from Donatello to Bellini</a> at the Metropolitan Museum of Art (to Mar. 18). The first met my expectations; the second exceeded them; the third, for me, was something of a letdown.<br /><br />I'll focus today on the last, since piles of deservedly high praise have already been heaped upon&nbsp; MoMA's and the BMFA's curatorial tours de force (which I hope to discuss in "Part II," next week). <br /><br />The Metropolitan Museum's exploration of the origins of portraiture in 15th-century and very early 16th-century Italy is an impressive feat of masterpiece wrangling---an absorbing array of some 160 works, including key examples, roped in from a wide variety of international sources and informed by the Met's high level of scholarship.<br /><br />For example, two meant-for-each-other busts---separately owned by European museums---were reunited for this occasion. The far more expressive, realistically rendered terracotta served as model for the formal marble portrait:<br /><br /><a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/RenPorStrT.jpg"><img alt="RenPorStrT.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/assets_c/2011/12/RenPorStrT-thumb-220x187-21119.jpg" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0 20px 20px 0;" height="187" width="220" /></a><a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/RenPorStrM.jpg"><img alt="RenPorStrM.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/assets_c/2011/12/RenPorStrM-thumb-220x205-21121.jpg" class="mt-image-right" style="float: right; margin: 0 0 20px 20px;" height="205" width="220" /></a><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><b>Benedetto da Maiano, "Filippo Strozzi,"1475: Left, terracotta, Staatliche Museum, Berlin; right, marble, the Louvre</b><br /><br />But notwithstanding the high points, I found the cumulative effect of the show's refined but often stolid countenances to be numbing, with occasional jolts of flesh-and-blood energy. Mine is an admittedly minority view among the reviewers who have weighed in so far. Others apparently arrived with the same <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2011/08/dressed_for_success_will_the_m.html">high anticipation</a> (scroll to bottom) that I had, but left feeling that their expectations had been fulfilled.<br /><br />When I visited the show for a second time (the first being the press preview), on the Friday before Christmas, the galleries (happily for me) were far from packed, perhaps because most people were engaged in gift wrapping and family-feast preparations:<br /><br /><img alt="RenPorGall.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/RenPorGall.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="375" width="500" /><br /><br />No blockbuster buzz had been jumpstarted by the favorable <b>NY Times</b> review published that same morning by <b>Ken Johnson</b>, who approvingly noted that "there is hardly a person pictured in the show whom you could not pick out of a police lineup."        To me, though, the show brought to mind not so much a police lineup as the composite sketches disseminated by police of unapprehended perps, whose physiognomies aren't precisely known. The broad characteristics are there, but the facial particularities and psychological depth aren't.<br /><br />From the evidence of this show, 15th-century Italian painters were just beginning to explore the potential of a genre that was later brought to glorious fruition by the likes of <b>Titian</b> and <b>Raphael</b>. At the press preview, Christiansen told us that "you will find over and over again that it's sculptors who are the innovators, painters who respond and follow." Perhaps that's because it is more natural to model lifelike flesh-and-blood in three dimensions than to evoke it with pigments on a flat surface.<br /><br />Even the relief portraits on the medals that abundantly punctuate the show outshine most of the paintings when it comes to depicting facial furrows and sagging flesh. Below is a medal of the same person depicted in the terracotta and marble busts above:<br /><br /><img alt="RenPorMed.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/RenPorMed.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="280" width="300" /><br /><b>Style of Nicolo Fiorentino, "Filippo Strozzi," 1489, National Gallery, Washington<br /></b><br />In one important way, this show could have been greatly enlivened. There's an elephant <b><i>not</i></b> in the room, whom I haven't yet seen the other reviewers mention---<b>Leonardo da Vinci</b>, whose spirit haunts the show, thanks to the introductory quote that greets visitors as they enter:<br /><br /><img alt="RenPortLeoT.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/RenPortLeoT.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="208" width="500" /><br /><br />Leonardo's words of wisdom sound like a recipe for a police sketch. But for him, coming up with the right nose was just the beginning. There is undoubtedly good reason for the near absence of his sublime achievement in the New York show---his generous representation in the acclaimed show that is now drawing ecstatic crowds to the National Gallery, London---<a href="http://www.nationalgallery.org.uk/whats-on/exhibitions/leonardo-da-vinci-painter-at-the-court-of-milan">Leonardo da Vinci: Painter at the Court of Milan</a> (to Feb. 5).<br /><br />The Met does, however, display one tiny, rapidly executed sketch:<br /><br /><img alt="RenPorLeo1.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/RenPorLeo1.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="270" width="277" /><br /><b>Leonardo da Vinci, "Lorenzo de' Medici," c. 1480, Royal Collection, Windsor Castle</b><br /><br />Leonardo had what many of the artists in the Met's show seem to have lacked---the ability to animate his subjects with compelling individuality and magnetic allure. His name is invoked, to the detriment of the Met's show, in a couple of labels, most notably one for <b>Lorenzo di Credi</b>'s "Portrait of a Young Woman," which is thought to portray <b>Ginevra de' Benci</b>,<b> </b>the wealthy Florentine merchant's daughter who was much more famously depicted by Leonardo:<br /><br /><a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/RenPorGin.jpg"><img alt="RenPorCredi.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/RenPorCredi.jpg" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0 20px 20px 0;" height="314" width="230" /></a><a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/assets_c/2011/12/RenPorBenci-thumb-235x244-21131.jpg"><img alt="Thumbnail image for RenPorBenci.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/assets_c/2011/12/RenPorBenci-thumb-235x244-21131-thumb-235x244-21135.jpg" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" height="244" width="235" /></a><br /><br /><br /><b>Left: Lorenzo di Credi, "Portrait of a Young Woman," c. 1490-1500, Metropolitan Museum; Right: Leonardo da Vinci, "Ginevra de' Benci," c. 1474/1478, Natonal Gallery, Washington (the latter not in the Met's show)</b><br /><br />By the Met's own admission (on its label), "Credi was clearly inspired by Leonardo but could not match the subtlety of his imagination or the enigmatic beauty of his paintings."<br /><br />The other elephants barely in the room are the Netherlandish painters from the same period. A wild-card <b>Memling</b> from the Met's collection is included in the exhibition to show the Netherlandish influence on Italian portraiture (which might in itself make a rewarding comparative exhibition).<br /><br />According to the Met's label for its "Portrait of a Young Man," Memling's work "was admired for its verisimilitude as well as the air of serenity he invariably gave his sitters."<br /><br />Aside from the 15th-century garb and coiffure, this looks like someone you might greet on the street:<br /><br /><img alt="RenPorMem.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/RenPorMem.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="467" width="500" /><br /><b>Hans Memling, "Portrait of a Young Man," c. 1472-75, Metropolitan Museum<br /></b><br />For me, the long, sometimes wearying trek through the galleries was amply rewarded near the end, when I came upon this distillation of pure spirituality. I took a deep breath, stopped flitting, and just gaped:<br /><br /><img alt="REnPorBell.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/REnPorBell.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="461" width="325" /><br /><strong>Jacopo Bellini, "Saint Bernardino of Siena," c. 1450-55, private collection</strong><br /><br />Bellini, we are told, "may have heard him [Saint Bernardino] preach in Ferrara, Venice, or in one of the cities of the Venetian territory. Of all the known paintings of Saint Bernardino, this one has the quality of a firsthand encounter."<br /><br />It's that immediacy, coupled with a profound view into the soul, that defines painted subjects who stay with us long after we have parted company.<br /><br />For the more informed, official view of the show (and a look at more of its works), let's now peruse the first five galleries in the company of Christiansen and his curatorial colleague at the Met, <b>Andrea Bayer</b>.<br /><br /><object style="height: 306px; width: 500px"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/jglCILBfk1c?version=3&amp;feature=player_profilepage" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/jglCILBfk1c?version=3&amp;feature=player_profilepage" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" height="306" width="500"></object>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2011/12/de_kooning_degas_donatello_to.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2011/12/de_kooning_degas_donatello_to.html</guid>
            
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 19:04:56 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>

