<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>CultureGrrl</title>
        <link>http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/</link>
        <description>Lee Rosenbaum&apos;s cultural commentary</description>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2013</copyright>
        <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 13:45:59 -0500</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
        
        <item>
            <title>Antiquities Collecting in Spotlight at AAMD&amp;#146s Midwinter Meeting</title>
            <description><![CDATA[ <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/wp/?attachment_id=4444" rel="attachment wp-att-4444"><img class="size-full wp-image-4444" alt="Dallas Museum of Art director Max Anderson, chair of AAMD's Task Force on Archaeological Material &amp; Ancient Art; " src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Anderson1-e1359049909398.jpg" height="339" width="225" /></a>
<br />
<strong>Dallas Museum of Art director Max Anderson, chair of AAMD's Task Force on Archaeological Material &amp; Ancient Art</strong><br /><br />I can't take any credit for this, but when it meets in Kansas City next week, the Association of Art Museum Directors will do exactly <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2013/01/blogback_more_on_aamds_misuse.html">what I said it should do</a>---review how members are following (or not) the association's <a href="http://www.aamd.org/newsroom/documents/2008ReportAndRelease.pdf">2008 guidelines</a> for antiquities collecting.

<br /><br />AAMD's just released rundown of <a href="http://aamd.org/newsroom/documents/AAMDPre-KansasCityMeetingPressRelease.pdf">highlights from its midwinter meeting's agenda</a> includes this hot-button colloquy (unfortunately closed to the public):<br /><br /><blockquote>A presentation about <em><strong>the application of AAMD's guidelines</strong></em> [emphasis added] for collecting antiquities and ancient art, and updates on changes in the field, led by <strong>Maxwell Anderson</strong>, chair, Task Force on Archaeological Material &amp; Ancient Art; <strong>Sharon Cott</strong>, general counsel, Metropolitan Museum of Art; and [attorney] <strong>Josh Knerly</strong>, Hahn Loeser &amp; Parks.</blockquote>
In my <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2013/01/gettys_latest_repatriation_plu.html">recent post</a> on AAMD's use and (in some cases) misuse of its <a href="http://aamdobjectregistry.org/Institutions">Object Registry</a>, I noted that the intended benefit of AAMD's guidelines for antiquities collecting---to diminish financial incentives for looters and their marketplace enablers---"is lost if museums repeatedly demonstrate a willingness to shell out money for pieces with problematic pasts, using their publication on a registry as a pretext to skirt the <a href="http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=13039&amp;URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&amp;URL_SECTION=201.html">UNESCO guidelines</a> that they purport to uphold."

<br /><br />While I assume that AAMD's plans to discuss this topic were already in place before my post on this subject, I've now got another suggestion that I hope they'll implement: Post a real-time webcast of that session, or at least post a video after the meeting has concluded, editing it, if necessary, to protect any needs for confidentiality.

<br /><br />Anderson, who is leading this session, is aggressively pro-transparency, having posted <a href="http://aamdobjectregistry.org/taxonomy/term/465">14 objects</a> that belonged on AAMD's registry but hadn't been put there by his predecessor at the Dallas Museum of Art.
<br /><br />I'd love to be a fly on the wall for this upcoming discussion. If we can't view the presentation, perhaps something that we <em><strong>can</strong></em> look forward to is a detailed written report or a forceful new statement on what constitutes the proper (and improper) use of AAMD's Object Registry.

<br /><br />At the very least, we need something more to the point than <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2013/01/aamd_has_every_confidence_in_m.html">this statement</a> released to me last week when I asked AAMD to respond to my critique of how some of its museums have been less than vigilant in following both the letter and the spirit of the association's acquisition guidelines]]></description>
            <link>http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2013/01/antiquities_collecting_in_spot.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2013/01/antiquities_collecting_in_spot.html</guid>
            
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 13:45:59 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Coin Toss: Hispanic Society&#146s Contradictory Stances on Rights of Archer Huntington&amp;#146s Heirs</title>
            <description><![CDATA[ The far-flung, tortuous odyssey continues for the superlative collection of coins related to Spain and other Spanish-speaking countries that were once owned by collector/philanthropist <b>Archer Huntington </b>and were donated by him in 1946 to the Hispanic Society of America. <br /><br />One of the most important of these emblems of history and culture has now happily landed on loan at the Metropolitan Museum (Gallery 166), in a small case with coins of <b>Julius Caesar</b>, <b>Marcus Antonius</b>, and Roman emperors of the 1st century A.D.<br /><br />The Met labels this silver piece as "one of the most famous and historic coins ever minted":<br /><br /><img alt="HispBrut2.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/HispBrut2.jpg" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0 20px 20px 0;" height="220" width="225" /><img alt="HispBrut.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/HispBrut.jpg" class="mt-image-right" style="float: right; margin: 0 0 20px 20px;" height="216" width="225" /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><b><br />Loaned to the Met: Silver denarius with the head of Brutus, commemorating the murder of Julius Caesar on the Ides of March</b> <br /><br />This ancient Roman coin was one of a very large group purchased by an anonymous private collector from the 37,895-piece Huntington Collection that the Hispanic Society of America (HSA) sold intact last March in a <a href="http://investor.shareholder.com/common/download/download.cfm?companyid=BID&amp;fileid=529014&amp;filekey=96f0bd79-bdd4-45f4-9585-86e61ea5c3d1&amp;filename=529014.pdf">sealed-bid Sotheby's auction</a>.<br /><br />The consortium of dealers who bought the entire trove for an undisclosed price divided it up for piecemeal resale. Until shortly before their disposal at Sotheby's, the coins had resided at the American Numismatic Society (ANS), where the HSA had deposited them on loan in 1949 at Huntington's behest. <br /><br />The anonymous buyer put his acquisitions <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2012/06/american_numismatic_society_re.html">on "permanent loan" at the American Numismatic Society</a>, (which, in turn, sent "Brutus" on loan to the Met). The ANS has <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2012/07/video_visit_to_american_numism.html">enthusiastically welcomed back</a>
 the partially retrieved collection, and is in the process of 
photographing  these coins and creating an online catalogue for them.<br /><br />They have now been <a href="http://www.coinweek.com/auctions-news/morton-eden-to-sell-coins-from-the-archer-m-huntington-collection/">widely</a> <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2012/07/breaking_up_hispanic_societys.html">dispersed</a> in a <a href="http://demo.coinworldonline.com/Articles/ViewArticle/more-huntington-coins-to-appear-at-auction">series</a> of European sales. Yet <a href="http://www.mortonandeden.com/">another auction</a> of more than 1,300 Huntington coins is scheduled for Mar. 6 by London coin auctioneers Morton &amp; Eden.<br /><br />I have previously discussed in detail why unloading and allowing the piecemeal dispersal of this consummate collection was not only <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2012/06/aamd_aam_condone_hispanic_coin.html">deplorable</a> but also appeared to run afoul of written stipulations in Archer Huntington's 1907 <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/96978633/Hispanic-Society-s-Trust-Indenture">trust indenture</a> governing the HSA. That document (see pp. 3-4) directed that <b><i>all of Huntington's benefactions</i></b> to the HSA should revert to him or to his heirs if any portion of his gift were disposed of. The legal term for this punitive provision is "right of reentry."<br /><br />I have now learned that <i><b>the Hispanic Society previously took a legal position diametrically opposed to its current stance regarding the Huntington heirs'</b> <b>right of reentry.</b></i> It did so in a 1990 State Supreme Court case (Index Number: 17954/90, not available online) involving the desire of the Heye Foundation to transfer to Boricua College the property occupied by the Museum of the American Indian (which, under new Smithsonian auspices, was planning to move to Washington and to the Customs House in Manhattan). The Museum of the American Indian (like the Hispanic Society) had been granted its property on Audubon Terrace in Manhattan by Archer Huntington.<br /><br />The court papers show that against strong pressure for the property to go to Boricua (from both the State Attorney General's office and then <b>Mayor David Dinkins</b>, among others), the Hispanic Society, together with Huntington's heirs, argued that Huntington would have preferred the property to go to the Society, which he had founded. They asserted that any attempt to transfer the property to a new owner such as Boricua, without an agreement from the heirs, would trigger the heirs' right to "reenter" and take the property. <br /><br />The HSA and Huntington heirs won. The judge ruled: "There <i><b>can be no conveyance of the property</b></i> [emphasis added] to Boricua College or any other grantee, free of Archer Huntington's heirs' right of reentry." Since the heirs (individuals who were specifically named as defendants in the Heye Foundation's lawsuit) wanted the property to go to the Hispanic Society, that's where it had to go. Both the HSA an Boricua had made monetary offers to the heirs to purchase the property. The heirs chose (and the court approved) the HSA's $2.1-million offer.<br /><br />I learned about this court case when one of the relatives of the defendants in the Heye lawsuit contacted me after reading prior <b>CultureGrrl</b> posts on the coins' sale at Sotheby's.<br /><br />The 1990 case involved real estate owned by the Heye Foundation, not a collection owned by the HSA. But this court precedent upholding the Huntington heirs' right of reentry (then defended by the HSA) strongly indicates that, at the very least, court approval should have been sought before the HSA undertook the disposal of Huntington's coins, which appear to have been similarly encumbered by a right-of-reentry stipulation. <br /><br />The State Attorney General's office, which <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2012/06/monetizing_the_money_why_did_n.html">went along</a> with the Hispanic Society's highly debatable assertion that no court approval was necessary, should have instead seen to it that the legally prudent course was taken. With the public's watchdog asleep, the public's patrimony was dispersed.<br /><br />At least some of it has <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/wp/2012/07/news_flash_with_video_american/">now returned</a> to public access (albeit on loan from private purchasers):<br /><br /><img alt="HispCoinRet.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/HispCoinRet.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="453" width="500" /><br /><b>Elena Stolyarik, collections manager of the American Numismatic Society, with a tray of coins reclaimed from the Hispanic Society of America's disposal<br /><i>Photo by Lee Rosenbaum<br /><br /></i></b>By contrast, the Brooklyn Museum took a more judicious course when confronting a similar right-of-reentry issue: As discussed in recent press accounts (<a href="http://www.dnainfo.com/new-york/20130107/prospect-heights/brooklyn-museum-may-have-pay-hundreds-of-thousands-store-fake-art#ixzz2HIaVtw7T">here</a> and <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/16/arts/design/brooklyn-museum-finds-some-problematic-gifts-cant-be-returned.html?smid=pl-share">here)</a>, it is seeking court approval for its planned disposal of inauthentic, misattributed or otherwise inferior works that were part of its 1932 <b>Michael Friedsam</b> bequest. Like Huntington, Friedsam stipulated in writing that his institutional beneficiary could not dispose of any portion of his gift and he stipulated a right of reentry for his heirs if that provision were violated. <br /><br />In the Friedsam case, a Manhattan Surrogate Court judge instructed the Brooklyn Museum to seek out those possibly eligible for the right of reentry. According to <b>Patricia Cohen</b>'s <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/16/arts/design/brooklyn-museum-finds-some-problematic-gifts-cant-be-returned.html?smid=pl-share">report</a> in the <b>NY Times</b>, "The museum has yet to begin looking, as it confers with the Attorney General's office on how to proceed." <br /><br />Both of these sticky situations underscore the perils of highly restrictive agreements with donors. Brooklyn's handling of its Friedsam flotsam underscores the irregularities of the approach taken by Hispanic Society of America regarding its more highly esteemed group of objects. Unlike Brooklyn, though, the HSA was never in a position to strike a better deal with its donor, because he was also the institution's founder.<b><br /></b><br />In the short run, it could be argued that dead donors and founders should not unduly tie the hands of today's museum administrators. But in the long run, playing fast and loose with restrictions governing past gifts or bequests could dangerously undermine the confidence of today's and tomorrow's benefactors.<br /><br />Promises made should be promises kept.



]]></description>
            <link>http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2013/01/coin_toss_hispanic_societys_ow.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2013/01/coin_toss_hispanic_societys_ow.html</guid>
            
            
            <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 11:43:39 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>BlogBack: More on AAMD&amp;#146s (Mis)use of Its Object Registry for Antiquities</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<img alt="AHagen.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/AHagen.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="218" width="201" /><br /><b>Alyssa Hagen</b><br /><br />It seems to me that art museums' <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2013/01/aamd_has_every_confidence_in_m.html">use, misuse and non-use</a> of the Association of Art Museum's  <a href="http://aamdobjectregistry.org/Antiquities">Object Registry</a> should be ripe for review at AAMD's imminent midwinter meeting, Jan. 27-30 in Kansas City.<br /><br />In the meantime, perhaps the association's members should get hold of the masters thesis of <b>Alyssa Hagen</b>, who graduated last spring from Rutgers University's Cultural Heritage and Preservation Studies program. She analyzed and criticized the Association of Art Museum Directors' Object Registry, as she explains in this response to my recent <b>CultureGrrl</b> post---<a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2013/01/gettys_latest_repatriation_plu.html">Getty's Latest Repatriation (plus AAMD members' loose interpretation of cultural-property guidelines)</a>:<br /><br /><blockquote>For my
masters thesis, I did a systematic analysis of the <a href="http://aamdobjectregistry.org/Institutions">museums' listings</a> in AAMD's Object Registry. It's obvious that some museums are using the database as a way to pay lip service to the <a href="http://www.aamd.org/newsroom/documents/2008ReportAndRelease.pdf">AAMD Guidelines</a>, while still continuing their old practices of accepting unprovenanced donations. <br /><br />Sometimes there are lucrative deals with influential donors: The Walters Art Museum's Bourne Collection [the registry's <a href="http://aamdobjectregistry.org/taxonomy/term/122">objects with TL 2009.20 accession numbers</a>] <a href="http://articles.baltimoresun.com/2011-09-08/entertainment/bs-ae-walters-0908-20110908_1_walters-director-gary-vikan-ancient-american-art-henry-walters">came with a nice endowment</a>. <br /><br />Using the registry to justify the purchase of antiquities with spotty histories completely defeats its purpose. The Cleveland Museum's <a href="http://aamdobjectregistry.org/node/634">Drusus head</a> was listed back in August, almost immediately after its <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/13/arts/design/cleveland-museum-buys-antiquities-stirs-ethics-debates.html?smid=pl-share">controversial acquisition</a>. <br /><br />Then there's the
added problem that some of the museums have not updated their own collecting policies to comply with the AAMD's 2008 guidelines, as well as internal inconsistencies: In many places, the choice of using the Object Registry seems to be up to the curators. <br /><br />[The above links are mine, not hers.]<br /></blockquote>And in other antiquities-related developments at American museums, the <b>LA Times</b>' <b>Jason Felch</b> of <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2011/05/chasing_aphrodite_my_qa_with_t.html">Chasing Aphrodite</a> fame <a href="http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/arts/culture/la-et-getty-ambers-20130119,0,1165994.story">reports</a>:<br /><br /><blockquote>In the wake of a scandal over its acquisition of looted antiquities, the J. Paul Getty Museum is trying to verify the ownership histories of 45,000 antiquities and publish the results in the museum's online collections database.<br /><br />

The study, part of the museum's efforts to be more transparent about the origins of ancient art in its collection, began last summer, said Getty spokesman <b>Ron Hartwig</b>.<br /></blockquote>The Getty has no objects posted on AAMD's registry, presumably because after having been roiled by antiquities controversies and givebacks, it hasn't dared (since June 2008, when the registry began) to acquire anything lacking a clear provenance going back at least&nbsp; to November 1970. <br /><br />For a comprehensive (source country-friendly) review of the Getty's collecting controversies, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Chasing-Aphrodite-Looted-Antiquities-Richest/dp/0151015015">read the book</a>:<br /><br /><a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/RalphJason.jpg"><img alt="RalphJason.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/assets_c/2011/05/RalphJason-thumb-325x287-19903.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="287" width="325" /></a><div><b>Jason Felch, right, with "Chasing Aphrodite" co-author Ralph Frammolino</b></div>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2013/01/blogback_more_on_aamds_misuse.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2013/01/blogback_more_on_aamds_misuse.html</guid>
            
            
            <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 18:09:29 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>What Would Ada Louise Say? NY Public Library Explains Why Building Won&amp;#146t Collapse After Blowing Its Stacks</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<img alt="NYPLstacks.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/NYPLstacks.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="467" width="400" /><br /><b>Soon-to-be-removed: The New York Public Library's stacks, which support the weight of its Main Reading Room</b><br /><br />Without naming her newspaper's <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2013/01/ada_louise_huxtable_doyenne_of.html">late architecture critic</a>, the <b>Wall Street Journal</b>'s <b>Jennifer Maloney</b> on Wednesday published the New York Public Library's rejoinder to one of the main gripes voiced by <b>Ada Louise</b> <b>Huxtable</b> regarding that institution's planned major overhaul of its flagship Fifth Avenue building (to be designed by <b>Norman Foster</b>).<br /><br />Maloney <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB10001424127887323596204578244201041827338-lMyQjAxMTAzMDEwNzExNDcyWj.html?mod=wsj_valettop_email">wrote</a>:<br /><br /><blockquote>Critics of the New York Public Library's $300 million renovation plan have doubted whether its most important engineering challenge is even possible: the removal of seven levels of century-old book stacks that support the Fifth Avenue building's Rose Main Reading Room like a 53-foot-high Erector set.<br /><br />Now officials have answered the skeptics [except for one who can no longer answer back]. They intend to install 12 new support columns in between the existing stacks, all while library patrons read in the vaulted space above.<br /></blockquote>The bulk of the WSJ article explains this very complex engineering problem and details how <b>Robert Silman</b>'s structural engineering firm plans to solve it. (Silman previously shored up both <b>Frank Lloyd Wright</b>'s Guggenheim Museum and his Fallingwater, calling the latter, "not safe from the day it was built," as I wrote in <a href="http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB106134872871015900-H9jeoNplaV2m52mZHqIb6WIm4.html">my WSJ piece</a> about that renovation project.)<br /><br />After reading Maloney's step-by-step account of the delicate, complicated process of transferring the weight of the Main Reading Room to new supports, in order to remove the stacks (sending 1 million books to New Jersey) to make way for a new circulating library, you can't help but think that Ada Louise may have been onto something.<br /><br />In her <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB10001424127887323751104578151653883688578-lMyQjAxMTAzMDAwNzEwNDcyWj.html?mod=wsj_valettop_email">final review</a> for the WSJ last month, Huxtable observed:<br /><br /><blockquote>Restoration and retrofitting would be easier and cheaper than supporting
 the reading room with the <b><i>enormously complex and expensive</i></b> [emphasis added] engineering 
needed during demolition and reconstruction. <br /></blockquote>One thing that Maloney's otherwise comprehensive article didn't reveal (probably because the Library didn't say) is how much this high-wire engineering act is going to cost.<br /><br />As quoted by Maloney, Silman tried to allay the fears of doubters in a presentation to a community 
board committee:<br /><br /><blockquote>It can be done. It has to be done carefully. I assure you, we 
can do it.<br /></blockquote>The question remains: <i><b>Should</b></i> this be done to New York's iconic temple of scholarship and at what cost? <br /><br />Somewhere in a City of Angels (not Los Angeles, <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2013/01/ada_louise_huxtables_estate_at.html">where her archives will reside</a>), Ada Louise must be skeptically raising an eyebrow.]]></description>
            <link>http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2013/01/ny_public_library_explains_why.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2013/01/ny_public_library_explains_why.html</guid>
            
            
            <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 12:08:35 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>AAMD Has &quot;Every Confidence&quot; in Members&amp;#146 Appropriate Use of Their Antiquities Object Registry</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<br /><img alt="AAMD.gif" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/AAMD.gif" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="80" width="325" /><br />In my <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2013/01/gettys_latest_repatriation_plu.html">Sunday post</a> on recent cultural-property news and controversies, I argued (and demonstrated) that some members of the Association of Art Museum Directors appeared to be using the group's <a href="http://aamdobjectregistry.org/Antiquities">Object Registry</a> "as a pretext to skirt the <a href="http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=13039&amp;URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&amp;URL_SECTION=201.html">UNESCO guidelines</a> [regarding acquisition of antiquities and other cultural property] that they purport to uphold." I asserted that museums need to be more "rigorously and scrupulously vigilant in following both
the letter and the spirit" of AAMD's <a href="http://www.aamd.org/newsroom/documents/2008ReportAndRelease.pdf">own acquisition guidelines</a>.

<br /><br />Today, at my request, AAMD's executive director, <b>Christine Anagnos</b>, responded to that post:<br /><br /><blockquote>AAMD's members understand that it is important to follow these guidelines---and <b><i>we have every confidence that our members are doing so</i></b> [emphasis added]. <br /><br />The Object Registry supports those guidelines by making it possible for members to acquire objects about which there may be unknown provenance details--and at the same time, publish those acquisitions in such a way as to encourage anyone with additional information to come forward.<br /></blockquote>A lawyer for a major antiquity-collecting museum volunteered a different reaction to my analysis: "Nicely done."<br /><br />At the very least, I hope my comments may stimulate some conversation and soul-searching within the field. <br /><br />I welcome <a href="mailto:culturegrrl@artsjournal.com">your further comments</a>.



]]></description>
            <link>http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2013/01/aamd_has_every_confidence_in_m.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2013/01/aamd_has_every_confidence_in_m.html</guid>
            
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 13:14:36 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>$65-Million Naming Opportunity: Groundbreaking for Metropolitan Museum&#146s &quot;David H. Koch Plaza&quot; (with video)</title>
            <description><![CDATA[ In an after-the-fact groundbreaking ceremony, postponed 
due to Hurricane Sandy, VIPs from the Metropolitan Museum of Art and 
government officials belatedly assembled yesterday to speech-ify and celebrate 
the museum's in-construction, revamped entrance plaza, to be named for 
its $65-million benefactor, Met trustee <b>David Koch</b>:<br /><br /><img alt="KochMet.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/KochMet.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="375" width="500" /><br /><b>In the Metropolitan Museum's Great Hall: </b><b>David Koch, sole funder of the Met's reconceived plaza that will bear his name, flanked by Met president Emily Rafferty, left, and trustee Shelby White, right<br /><i>Photo by Lee Rosenbaum</i></b><br /><br />Here's how the Met's two new fountains (as conceived by Fluidity Design Consultants) are expected to look at the plaza's reopening, projected for Fall 2014:<br /><br /><img alt="MetFount.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/MetFount.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="350" width="500" /><br /><b><i>Rendering courtesy of Metropolitan Museum of Art</i></b><br /><br />Here's what what the area looks like now:<br /><br /><img alt="MetDig.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/MetDig.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="375" width="500" /><br /><i><b>Photo by Lee Rosenbaum</b></i><br /><br />Famous (or, in some quarters, infamous) for his megabucks <a href="http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/08/30/koch-opens-up-about-his-financing-of-super-pacs/?smid=pl-share">contributions to conservative Republican causes</a>, Koch originally was not to be accorded a naming plaque at the plaza, according to <b>Carol Vogel</b>'s <a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/01/14/ground-is-officially-broken-on-met-museums-david-h-koch-plaza/?smid=pl-share">NY Times report</a> about Monday's groundbreaking ceremony. But "officials there [at the Met] have changed their minds," Vogel observed, without explanation. (You'll hear Koch express his gratitude for this recognition in my <b>CultureGrrl Video</b>, below.)<br /><br />My view on dedicating the "David H. Koch Plaza": If $65 million doesn't entitle you to naming rights (whatever your political persuasion or views on global warming), what does? <br /><br />Koch's name is also on the extensively renovated former New York State Theater at Lincoln Center. With its upgrades underwritten by the billionaire's $100-million benefaction, the David H. Koch Theater <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/13/arts/music/city-opera-departure-leaves-vacancy-at-koch-theater.html">lost one of its two prime tenants</a>---the financially shaky New York City Opera---soon after it reopened. A major goal of the renovation had been to improve the hall's acoustics in consideration of the opera company's needs.<br /><br />One highly impolitic politician, who was the last in the line-up of speakers at the Met, couldn't resist getting in a dig at Koch before digging the dirt with him outside. In an astonishing did-he-really-say-that moment, <b>Manhattan Borough President Scott Stringer</b> quipped:<br /><br /><blockquote>I never thought I'd see in my lifetime Manhattan liberals praising David Koch. Well, it's $65 million!<br /></blockquote><img alt="Stringer.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/Stringer.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="375" width="500" /><br /><b>Manhattan Borough President Scott Stringer at the Met's ceremony<br /><i>Photo by Lee Rosenbaum</i></b><br /><br />If Stinger's zinger made me cringe, it must also have unsettled some of those who had assembled to thank the donor.<br /><br />I had another did-he-really-say-that moment when Met director <b>Tom Campbell</b> indicated that London-based architect <b>Rick Mather</b>, whose two kiosks for the plaza <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2012/12/mather_matters_famed_architect.html">had been scrapped</a> in the face of community concerns, wasn't (as I had previously been told by a Met spokesperson) totally benched from the project after all. He would design benches. Isn't the architect of a new wing at the <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2010/06/virginia_mfas_architectural_hi.html">Virginia Museum of Fine Arts</a> and a planned new wing for the <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2011/11/peabody_essex_chooses_rick_mat.html">Peabody Essex Museum</a> slightly over-qualified for benches? (Will the Met will make it up to him on some future project?)<br /><br />For more information about the Met's plaza plans, read the detailed press release, <a href="http://www.metmuseum.org/about-the-museum/press-room/news/2012/plaza-renovation-plans">here.</a><br /><br />Somewhat beside-the-point, since ground had long since been broken, the dirt-shoveling part of the program was pretty lame (as you will soon see). Unfortunately, they hadn't arranged a return engagement of the soulful singing group Select Blendz, who had <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2012/12/mather_matters_famed_architect.html">enlivened the plaza</a> when I <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CrSreRkU45w&amp;list=UUiirvwHQFttSZgpUfIhZgow&amp;index=3">last shot a video</a> there.<br /><br />The entertainment, such as it was, came from the Met's senior vice president for external affairs, <b>Harold Holzer</b>, who coached his hardhatted cast by using everything he had learned about directing from <b>Steven Spielberg</b> on the set of "Lincoln" (for which Holzer, a <a href="http://www.haroldholzer.com/">distinguished Lincoln scholar</a> in his spare time, was a credited consultant). <br /><br />Near the end of my video clip, after listening to excerpts from speeches by Campbell and Koch, you'll hear Harold exhort the digging dignitaries: "Throw it [the shoveled soil] at Harold!"<br /><br /><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/ZPY3DUbaPMY?rel=0" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="375" width="500"></iframe><br /><a href="http://www.metmuseum.org/about-the-museum/press-room/news/2012/plaza-renovation-plans"></a>





]]></description>
            <link>http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2013/01/groundbreaking_ceremony_for_me.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2013/01/groundbreaking_ceremony_for_me.html</guid>
            
            
            <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 15:22:10 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>From Stalled Guggenheim Helsinki to the Albright-Knox: Janne Sirén Named to Direct in Buffalo</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/Siren.jpg"><img alt="Siren.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/assets_c/2013/01/Siren-thumb-500x195-21885.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="195" width="500" /></a><br /><b>Janne Sirén, fronting Clyfford Still's "October 1950" at the Albright-Knox Art Gallery, where he will assume the directorship later this year<br /><i>Photograph by Tom Loonan</i></b><br /><br />First off, he shortened his name.<br /><br />When he was helping to formulate and promote plans for the Guggenheim Helsinki, for which he was thought to be a likely choice for director, <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2011/10/global_guggenheim_abu_dhabi_sl.html">we knew him</a> (scroll down) as <strong>Janne Gallen-Kallela-Sirén</strong>, director of the Helsinki Art Museum. Even <b>Ari Wiseman</b>, the Guggenheim's deputy director, <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2011/12/guggenheim_helsinki_the_view_f.html">had difficulty pronouncing his name</a>.<br /><br /><img alt="GuggHels.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/GuggHels.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="244" width="365" /><br /><strong>On the streets of Helsinki: Janne Sirén, left; Guggenheim director Richard Armstrong, center; Ari Wiseman, right</strong>. <b>(Only</b> <strong>Sirén convincingly looks like he might actually throw that snowball.)</strong><br /><br />With the Guggenheim's northern lights <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2012/05/follow-ups_on_goshens_governme.html">now dimmed</a>, the Albright-Knox Gallery, Buffalo (whose snowy climate rivals Finland's), today announced that <strong>Janne Sirén</strong>, as he is now known, will become its new director, beginning this spring or summer. He succeeds <a href="http://www.buffalonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20121125/CITYANDREGION/121129686/1109">long-time director</a> <strong>Louis Grachos</strong>, who, strangely, was unmentioned in today's <a href="http://www.albrightknox.org/news-and-features/press-releases/article:11th-director/">press release</a>. Also unmentioned was Sirén's Guggenheim connection, although the release did appear to allude to it:<br /><br /><blockquote>Under the direction of Dr. Sirén, the Helsinki Art Museum has worked 
with partners around the globe, including some of the world's largest 
art institutions.<br /></blockquote>The America-educated director was a prime mover in crafting the 186-page feasibility study for the Guggenheim's hoped-for Scandinavian satellite. (My views on that are <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2012/04/new_global_guggenheim_developm.html">here</a>.)<br /><b><br />Karen Lee Spaulding</b> continues as interim director at the Albright-Knox until <strong> </strong>Sirén (who was in Buffalo for the announcement) takes the helm. He praised "the Albright-Knox's legacy of visionary collection development, its 
artist-centric approach and ability to institutionally reinvent itself 
over time"...not to mention its penchant for <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2007/06/the_albrightknox_pox_will_it_b.html">reinventing its collection</a>.<br /><br /><b>Colin Dabkowski</b>'s interview of Sirén in today's <b>Buffalo News</b> is <a href="http://www.buffalonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20130114/CITYANDREGION/130119557">here</a>.<br />]]></description>
            <link>http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2013/01/from_stalled_guggenheim_helsin.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2013/01/from_stalled_guggenheim_helsin.html</guid>
            
            
            <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 19:34:06 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Getty&#146s Latest Repatriation (plus AAMD members&amp;#146 loose interpretation of cultural-property guidelines)</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<img alt="GettyHades.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/GettyHades.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="480" width="384" /><br /><strong>Head of Hades, Greek, Morgantina, Italy, c. 400-300 B.C., terracotta and pigment </strong><br /><br />In another case of a voluntary repatriation by an American museum, the J. Paul Getty Museum announced last week that it would hand over its 10 3/4-inches-high Head of Hades, now on display at the Getty Villa, to the <span>Archaeological Museum</span> in Aidone, Italy, after the conclusion of the Getty-organized traveling exhibition, <a href="http://www.getty.edu/visit/exhibitions/future.html">Sicily: Art and Invention between Greece and Rome</a> (Getty Villa, Apr. 3-Aug. 19; Cleveland Museum of Art, Sept. 30-Jan. 5, 2014; Palazzo Ajutamicristo, Palermo, February to June 2014). <br /><br />This is the <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2011/09/two_more_getty_give-backs_to_g.html">second recent repatriation</a> under the Getty Trust presidency of <b>James Cuno</b>, but the first since <b>Timothy Potts</b> <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2012/02/culturegrrl_qa_with_incoming_g_1.html">assumed the directorship</a> of the Getty Museum. Other recent voluntary returns have been initiated by the <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2010/11/met_repatriates_19_king_tut_ob.html">Metropolitan Museum</a> (to Egypt), <a href="http://www.dallasmuseumofart.org/PressRoom/dma_507374">Dallas Museum of Art</a> (to Turkey) and <a href="http://www.penn.museum/press-releases/887-penn-museum-strengthens-partnership-with-turkey,-agrees-to-indefinite-term-loan-of-troy-gold.html">Penn Museum</a> (an "indefinite-term loan" to Turkey, not an ownership transfer).<br /><br />But notwithstanding these amicable agreements, U.S. museums are increasingly using their posting of objects on the Association of Art Museum Director's <a href="http://aamdobjectregistry.org/Antiquities">Object Registry</a> for archaeological materials and ancient art as a license to purchase works that don't meet the standards set by the 1970 UNESCO Convention regarding cultural property (to which the United States became a signatory in 1983).<br /><br />The Getty  purchased its Head of Hades in 1985 from collector <b>Maurice Tempelsman</b>. <b>David Ng</b> and <b>Jason Felch</b> of the <b>LA Times</b> <a href="http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/arts/culture/la-et-cm-getty-museum-hades-sculpture-sicily-20130110,0,2715069.story">report</a> (and the Getty confirmed) that Tempelsman had purchased it from London dealer <b>Robin Symes</b> (a <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2011/09/minneapolis_finally_agrees_to.html">known</a> <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2008/11/more_on_cleveland_museums_retu.html">conduit</a> for antiquities of problematic provenance). "Getty records show the museum paid $530,000 for it," according to the LA Times article. (The Getty would not discuss its price.)<br /><br />The Getty's <a href="http://www.getty.edu/art/gettyguide/artObjectDetails?artobj=12930">online description</a> discusses a change in the identification of the sculpture's subject:<br /><br /><blockquote>This head was previously thought to depict Zeus, the king of the gods, who is called "blue bearded" in the Homeric poems. [As you can see in the above photo, the head has remnants of blue pigment on its beard.] But [the head] is now believed to represent his brother, Hades, king of the Underworld, based on its association with finds from the ancient city of Morgantina, Sicily. <br /></blockquote>The Getty described those Morgantina finds in last Thursday's <a href="http://news.getty.edu/press-materials/press-releases/hades-returns-to-sicily.htm">press release</a>:<br /><br /><blockquote>In keeping with the principle of repatriating works when compelling evidence warrants it, the decision to transfer this head is based on the discovery of four terracotta fragments found near Morgantina in Sicily, similar in style and medium to the Getty head. <br /><br />Getty Museum curators initiated discussions with Sicilian colleagues on the possible relationship between the head and the fragments in 2011, and then worked with the director of the Morgantina Archaeological Park to corroborate the identification. These fragments indicate that the original location of the head was the site of a sanctuary of Demeter, which was clandestinely excavated in the late 1970s.<br /></blockquote>What's more, the terracotta body from which the head was lopped off is currently "<span>in the course of an extensive restoration" at the same museum in Aidone that will soon also possess the head.</span><br /><br />Notwithstanding such isolated instances of returns in the face of convincing evidence of looting or illicit export, American museums (which by 2008 had largely stopped collecting antiquities with murky histories of ownership, after a <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2008/01/met_antiquities_shuffle_win_on.html">forceful</a> <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2007/08/culturegrrls_q_a_with_getty_mu.html">surge</a> <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2007/10/italyprinceton_antiquities_dea.html">of</a> <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2006/12/more_antiquities_restitution_n.html">repatriation</a> claims from Italy and Greece) now appear increasingly willing to deviate from the strict "1970 rule" set forth in the <a href="http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=13039&amp;URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&amp;URL_SECTION=201.html">UNESCO Convention</a> regarding cultural property. That landmark document prohibits the acquisition of antiquities that cannot be proven either to have left their countries of origin before Nov. 14, 1970 or to have been legally exported from the countries of origins after that date.<br /><br />Some <a href="http://aamdobjectregistry.org/Institutions">579 objects from 16 institutions</a> are now posted on the Association of Art Museum Directors' Object Registry. That website is intended to be a compendium of all archaeological materials and ancient art acquired by member-museums after June 4, 2008 that do not have a known provenance extending back until at least Nov. 14, 1970. The largest list by far---some 358 of the 579 pieces---comes from the Walters Art Museum in Baltimore.<br /><br />AAMD's <a href="http://www.aamd.org/newsroom/documents/2008ReportAndRelease.pdf">2008 guidelines</a> for its registry state that when deviating from the 1970 rule, museums should "carefully balance the possible financial and reputational harm of taking such a step against the benefit of collecting, presenting, and preserving the work in trust for the educational benefit of present and future generations."<br /><br />The association's guidelines further stipulate:<br /><br /><blockquote>Member museums <em><strong>normally should not acquire a work</strong></em> unless provenance research <b><i>substantiates</i></b> that the work was outside its country of probable modern discovery <i><b>before 1970</b></i> or was legally exported from its probable country of modern discovery after 1970....The museum <i><b>must prominently post</b></i> on the AAMD website...an image and the information about the work...and <i><b>all facts relevant to the decision to acquire it</b></i>, including its known provenance [emphasis added].<br /></blockquote>Evidence that not all museums necessarily complied with this posting requirement came when the Dallas Museum of Art's omissions were <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2012/03/turkeys_repatriation_claims_me.html">rectified</a> [scroll down] by its current director, <b>Maxwell Anderson</b>. Shortly after he arrived at the DMA last January, he posted <a href="http://aamdobjectregistry.org/taxonomy/term/465">14 objects</a> that belonged on AAMD's registry but hadn't been put there. In compliance with the "all relevant facts" guideline, Dallas also provided detailed "reasons for acquisition as an exception to the 1970 rule." (<a href="http://aamdobjectregistry.org/node/382">Here's one example</a>.)<br /><br />Some other museums, however, provide no written justification whatsoever for disregarding the 1970 rule. They post only the pieces' vague provenances. <br /><br /><a href="http://aamdobjectregistry.org/node/90">Here's one example</a> from the Walters Art Museum. The information below the photo is all that appears on AAMD's registry:<br /><br /><img alt="WaltersInd.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/WaltersInd.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="478" width="350" /><br /><b>"Dwarf Form of Vishnu," 10th century, India<br />PROVENANCE INFORMATION: Jaipaul Gallery, Philadelphia (date and mode of acquisition unknown); John and Berthe Ford, Baltimore, June 13, 1976, by purchase; Walters Art Museum, 2008, by gift</b><br /><br />Continued pressure from source countries---most notably a recent surge of contested claims from <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2012/03/turkeys_repatriation_claims_me.html">Turkey</a> and <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2012/06/tom_campbell_on_cambodias_clai.html">Cambodia</a>---demonstrates that the cultural-property wars are far from over. If museums hope to take the high ground in these skirmishes, they need, at the very least, to be rigorously and scrupulously vigilant in following both the letter and the spirit of their own acquisition guidelines. <br /><br />The purpose of these rules was to diminish financial incentives for looters and their marketplace enablers. This intended benefit is lost If museums repeatedly demonstrate a willingness to shell out money for pieces with problematic pasts, using their publication on a registry as a pretext to skirt the UNESCO guidelines that they purport to uphold.<br />

]]></description>
            <link>http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2013/01/gettys_latest_repatriation_plu.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2013/01/gettys_latest_repatriation_plu.html</guid>
            
            
            <pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2013 22:06:46 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Ada Louise Huxtable&amp;#146s Estate Attorney Discusses Her Getty Surprise</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<img alt="HuxtShap.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/HuxtShap.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="248" width="197" /><br /><b>Robert N. Shapiro,  partner in Ropes &amp; Gray's Private Client Group<br /></b><br />Speaking to me by phone today, <b>Ada Louise Huxtable</b>'s estate attorney, <b>Robert Shapiro</b>, declined to confirm 
or deny that his client had been in discussions with the New York Public Library or other possible recipients of her archives before her <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2013/01/ada_louise_huxtables_posthumou.html">last-minute surprise deal</a> with the J. Paul Getty Trust. <br /><br /> Citing the confidentiality of his relationships with clients, he would only say  that "she was extremely excited and thrilled with her papers' and <b>Garth</b>'s [her late husband's] papers' and her estate's going to the Getty. They were working on a <a href="http://news.getty.edu/press-materials/press-releases/getty-mourns-ada-louise-huxtable.htm">news release</a> and, 
alas, her health and her death happened to happen first."<br /><br />When I noted that the migration of her archives to the West Coast was a great loss for New York City (a far stronger focus of her writings than Los Angeles), Shapiro noted that this resolution was "a good reminder that it's a big world in which she's certainly being recognized as she should be." Am I reading too much into this to see this "good reminder" as a wake-up call and a rebuke to New York institutions, which perhaps weren't offering Ada Louise what she regarded as appropriate recognition?<br /> <div><br /></div>I also asked why Huxtable had sold her archives to the Getty, when all the proceeds from her estate (including the proceeds from the Getty's purchase) were destined for the Los Angeles institution. <br /><br />His reply:<br /><br /><blockquote>Personal planning has complex strands to it, related to how one lives one's life. She was thoughtful about what she was doing and wanted to do and I was here to help her for a long time. We knew her goals and it was a long, thoughtful process.<br /></blockquote>The addition of the Huxtable Archives to the Special Collections at the Getty Research Institute, he said, meant "great prospects for her legacy both specifically, with her papers, and also philosophically, with the continuing research, thinking, writing and commentating that it will enable."<br /><br />So be it.<br />]]></description>
            <link>http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2013/01/ada_louise_huxtables_estate_at.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2013/01/ada_louise_huxtables_estate_at.html</guid>
            
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 11:21:47 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Ada Louise Huxtable&amp;#146s Posthumous Commentary? Her Entire Estate to the Getty</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<img alt="GettyRI.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/GettyRI.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="287" width="500" /><br /><b>Ada Louise Huxtable and architect Richard Meier: A marriage made in heaven?<br /><i>Meier's Getty Research Institute</i></b><br /><br />The startling news that the late, preeminent architecture critic and inveterate New Yorker <strong>Ada Louise Huxtable</strong> arranged for the transfer of not only her archives but her entire estate to the J. Paul Getty Trust in Los Angeles raises the obvious question:<br /><br />What was she thinking?<br /><br />In his <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/obituaries/la-me-ada-louise-huxtable-20130109,0,1732780.story">obit for the <b>LA Times</b></a>, architecture critic <b>Christopher Hawthorne</b> noted that the bequest was "something of a surprise, given the critic's close association with New York and the East Coast."<br /><br />In its celebratory <a href="http://news.getty.edu/press-materials/press-releases/getty-mourns-ada-louise-huxtable.htm">press release</a>, the Getty writes:<br /><br /><blockquote>Her papers, as well as those of her husband, industrial designer <b>L. Garth Huxtable</b> [who died in 1989], which include notes, correspondence, research files, manuscripts, drawings and photographs, will become part of the GRI's [Getty Research Institute's] rich architectural collections.<br /><br />

The Getty acquired these extensive archives from Huxtable in December 2012 and they will become widely available to researchers once they are processed and cataloged. In addition, Huxtable bequeathed the entirety of her estate as well as her intellectual property rights to the Getty, in order to advance the study of architecture.<br /></blockquote>In my fervid imagination, I can see this arrangement, finalized in the month before her death, as Ada Louise's last flourish of acerbic commentary. At the beginning of December, when I read <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB10001424127887323751104578151653883688578-lMyQjAxMTAzMDAwNzEwNDcyWj.html?mod=wsj_valettop_email">her scathing account</a> in the <b>Wall Street Journal</b> of how she was treated by the New York Public Library in her quest for detailed information about its renovation plans, I was struck (as I wrote on Monday in <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2013/01/ada_louise_huxtable_doyenne_of.html">my own appreciation</a> of her life) by the unusualness of a journalist's allowing herself "the rare luxury of complaining in print (at some length) about the runaround she had gotten." <br /><br />Further fueling my (purely speculative) notion about a possible last-minute change of plans for Huxtable's estate is an e-mail that I just received from a Getty spokesperson in response to my questions regarding the transfer: Discussions between the Getty and Ada Louise only began "late last year and were finalized in December," the spokesperson revealed. The Getty has "no idea" about any previous plans for the estate to go elsewhere.<br /><br />A spokesperson for the New York Public Library, responding by phone to my queries about whether that institution had engaged in any discussions with Huxtable regarding the disposition of her archives, told me that such talks, if any, would have been confidential. She added, however, that "no agreement was in place for her to give her papers to the library."<br /><br />In its e-mail to me, the Getty provided more details about its arrangement with Huxtable:<br /><br /><blockquote>The agreement was a combination: We purchased Mrs. Huxtable's archives. (As you know, we don't disclose price.) She gave us Garth Huxtable's papers and she bequeathed virtually her entire estate to the Getty. The estate includes her homes. Her estate will be liquidating her assets and the Getty will receive the proceeds.<br /></blockquote>I have further queries pending with others. If I learn more, you'll learn more. [<b>UPDATE</b>: More on this, <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2013/01/ada_louise_huxtables_estate_at.html">here</a>.]<br /><br />Meanwhile, please savor with me the perfect homage that the <b>Wall Street Journal</b>'s "Leisure &amp; Arts" page has paid today to its celebrated architecture critic---a <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323482504578229870698201486.html">full-page compendium</a> of passages from her brilliant reviews. The editor's note (which I assumed was penned by <b>Eric Gibson</b>) stands as a perfect summation of her genius:<br /><br /><blockquote>Though a self-described "unrepentant modernist"---a passionate advocate of
 the steel-and-glass aesthetic---Huxtable was no ideologue....As a critic, Huxtable combined the forensic skill of a <b>Clarence Darrow</b> with the righteous passion of an Old Testament prophet. Her prose was clarion-clear and uncompromising, yet leavened by wit and verve.<br /></blockquote><b>CORRECTION</b>: A previous version of this post said that Eric Gibson had recruited Huxtable to be the WSJ's architecture critic. The credit for that coup belongs to Eric's predecessor, <b>Ray Sokolov</b>.<br />

]]></description>
            <link>http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2013/01/ada_louise_huxtables_posthumou.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2013/01/ada_louise_huxtables_posthumou.html</guid>
            
            
            <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 14:54:37 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Warhol Museum Regards the Met&#146s &quot;Regarding Warhol,&quot; Plans Major Changes</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<img alt="MetWarhCrd.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/MetWarhCrd.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="375" width="500" /><br /><b>The crowd on Dec. 18 at the Metropolitan Museum's "Regarding Warhol: Sixty Artists, Fifty Years"<i><br />Photo by Lee Rosenbaum</i></b><br /><br />What do you do when you sign onto what sounds like a very promising project---the Metropolitan Museum's <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2012/09/warhol-ian_banality_at_the_met.html">Regarding Warhol</a> exhibition (now closed), only to find that it's a popular success but a <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2012/09/warhols_campbell_the_soup_not.html">critical train wreck</a>?

<br /><br />You reconceive it.<br /><br /><b>Eric Shiner</b>, director of the most sympathetic place to see Warhol's work---the <a href="http://www.warhol.org/">Andy Warhol Museum</a>, where the show travels (Feb. 3-Apr. 28)---is billed in his institution's recent <a href="http://www.warhol.org/uploadedFiles/Warhol_Site/Warhol/Content/The_Museum/Press_room/documents/Regarding_Warhol_Press_Release_1-7-13.pdf">press release</a> as curator of the show's Pittsburgh presentation. I asked Shiner if his show would differ from the New York version, and whether the negative critical response would be taken into account.<br /><br />And how. Here's what Eric told me today:<br /><br /><blockquote>The installation at the Andy Warhol Museum will be quite different from the installation at the Met.  Of course, we will have many more Warhol works on display in our galleries, and perhaps the biggest change will be the space dedicated to the exhibition: In Pittsburgh, we will spread the show over six floors of the museum.<br /><br />Sadly, about six of the works from the Met show were unable to travel to Pittsburgh for a variety of reasons, but we have replaced them with similar works by the same artists from the holdings of the Carnegie Museum of Art, our sister institution.  We are also incorporating <b>Kara Walker</b> into the mix, based on her recent statements about Warhol's Shadows paintings being a huge influence on her and her work.  <br /><br />Finally, we will be making <i><b>many different juxtapositions and comparisons</b></i> [emphasis added] between Warhol's work and the participating artists that will be quite different from the Met exhibition.  We have taken the criticisms of the Met show into account as we redesigned the show for Pittsburgh.<br /></blockquote>This makes an interesting postcript to <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2012/11/culturegrrl_curriculum_my_midd.html">my November lecture</a> at Middlebury College on  <a href="http://museum.middlebury.edu/news/2012-2013/november_events/node/887">How Critics Influence Museums (and vice versa)</a>, where I mentioned that the show's critical drubbing seemed to have no effect on attendance (a point also humorously made by <b>Tom Campbell</b>, the Met's director, at his museum's recent press luncheon, where he referred to "Regarding Warhol" as "the show everyone loves to hate," and then reported on its robust attendance.<br /><br />Shiner has shined a spotlight on an alternate take on the critical-popular dialectic: Maybe the opinions of critics sometimes <b><i>do</i></b> count!<br />]]></description>
            <link>http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2013/01/warhol_museum_regards_the_mets.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2013/01/warhol_museum_regards_the_mets.html</guid>
            
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 12:38:59 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Ada Louise Huxtable, Doyenne of Architecture Criticism, Dies at 91</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<img alt="Huxtable2.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/Huxtable2.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="328" width="264" /> <div><b>The legend on her pillow: "Ada Louise Huxtable already doesn't like it" (a caption from a <i>New Yorker</i> cartoon).</b></div><div><b><i>Photo: Melanie Flood for New York Observer</i></b></div><div><b><br /></b>The world of architecture is in mourning.<br /><br /><b>Ada Louise Huxtable</b>, the <a href="http://www.pulitzer.org/faceted_search/results/Huxtable">Pulitzer Prize-winning</a>, high spirited, fiercely opinionated architecture critic, revered by architecture historians and feared by developers, was the pioneer who brought serious, informed architecture criticism to daily newspapers. Her writing was invariably erudite, lucid and witty. The few times when she graciously conversed with me, in writing or in person, I felt I as though I had been touched by royalty.<br /><br />At the time of her death today at the age of 91, she was architecture critic for the <b>Wall Street Journal</b>. She wrote until the end with the verve, feistiness and exhaustive command of the facts of someone one-third her age.<br /><br />Take <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB10001424127887323751104578151653883688578-lMyQjAxMTAzMDAwNzEwNDcyWj.html?mod=wsj_valettop_email">her final piece for the WSJ</a>, published early last month, about the New York Public Library's plans to renovate and restructure its flagship 42nd Street facility (or, as she put it, "to undertake its own destruction"). She delivered a detailed analysis of why, in her estimation, the library's stacks should not be demolished---arguing her case not just on historic preservation grounds, but also on engineering grounds:<br /><br /><blockquote>What no one seems to have noticed, or mentioned, is that the stacks are 
the structural support of the reading room. They literally hold it up....Restoration and retrofitting would be easier and cheaper than supporting
 the reading room with the enormously complex and expensive engineering 
needed during demolition and reconstruction. <br /></blockquote>What's more, she allowed herself the rare luxury of complaining in print (at some length) about the runaround she had gotten after asking library officials to release "schematic studies of how the vacated space would be used....I have been patient and cooperative, but I believe I have waited long enough." What she didn't mention was that her exasperation may have been heightened by a consciousness that her own time was running out.<br /><br />It is probably no coincidence that two weeks after Ada Louise's heated critique, the Library released more information about its construction plans. In her <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/19/arts/design/new-york-public-library-offers-peek-at-renovation.html?smid=pl-share">NY Times report</a> on this, <b>Robin Pogrebin</b> tipped her hat to Huxtable by quoting her complaint in the the rival newspaper about the long-time dearth of information. The Library claimed that "the designs were not refined until now," Pogrebin reported.<br /><br />I hope that both the online editions of the <b>Wall Street Journal</b> and the <b>New York Times</b> (where Ada Louise wrote with universally admired distinction from 1963 to 1982) will link to highlights from among her many articles, along with an appreciative recap of her many achievements. (The Times has just posted its <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/08/arts/design/ada-louise-huxtable-architecture-critic-dies-at-91.html?smid=pl-share">detailed obituary</a>.)<br /><br />The tributes from the art and architecture critics who are her progeny are already <a href="http://archrecord.construction.com/news/2013/01/130107-Early-Tributes-to-Ada-Louise-Huxtable-1921-2013.asp">pouring in</a>.<br /><br /><b>UPDATE</b>: More on this, <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2013/01/ada_louise_huxtables_posthumou.html">here</a> and <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2013/01/ada_louise_huxtables_estate_at.html">here</a>.<br /></div>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2013/01/ada_louise_huxtable_doyenne_of.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2013/01/ada_louise_huxtable_doyenne_of.html</guid>
            
            
            <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 20:29:39 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Masterpiece Postage: Museum-Owners of &quot;Modern Art in America&quot; Identified</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/Stamps5.jpg"><img alt="Stamps5.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/assets_c/2013/01/Stamps5-thumb-500x407-21876.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="407" width="500" /></a> <div><i><b>Click on the image for larger view.</b></i><br /><br />Late on Friday, a<b> CultureGrrl</b> reader/librarian and a spokesperson for the U.S. Postal Service almost simultaneously e-mailed to me the list I was waiting for---the names of the museums that own the originals reproduced on the glorious <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2013/01/masterpiece_postage_usps_comme.html">Modern Art in America stamps</a>, above, to be issued on Mar. 7 (but <a href="https://store.usps.com/store/browse/productDetailSingleSku.jsp?productId=S_579604&amp;categoryId=subcatS_S_Sheets#">available for pre-order</a> now). <br /><br />The Whitney Museum is one of three institutions (also including the Museum of Modern Art and Yale University) that have two works in this philatelic display. How much more appropriate would it have been for the USPS to have celebrated its first-day-of-issue ceremony not at a commercial art fair (New York's Armory Show) but at the Whitney Museum, whose current permanent-collection show, <a href="http://whitney.org/Exhibitions/AmericanLegends">American Legends: From Calder to O'Keeffe</a>, includes rich mini-exhibitions of works by almost all the postal-service designees?<br /><br />There's a recent precedent for an art museum ceremony: When the USPS came out with its Abstract Expressionist stamps two years ago, the <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2010/03/abstract_expressionists_the_po.html">commemorative ceremony</a> was held at that issue's main "lender"---the Albright-Knox Gallery, Buffalo, owner of four of the 10 reproduced works.<br /><br />In any event, here are the museum credits for the 12 modern Americans to be enshrined on "forever stamps" (left to right, top row to bottom row on the above sheet):<br /><br />

<blockquote>---<strong>Charles Demuth</strong>, "I Saw the Figure 5 in Gold," 1928, Metropolitan Museum of Art<br />
---<strong>John Marin</strong>, "Sunset, Maine Coast," 1919, Columbus Museum of Art
<br />---<strong>Stuart Davis</strong>, "House and Street," 1931, Whitney Museum of American Art<br />
---<strong>Marsden Hartley</strong>, "Painting, Number 5," 1914-15, also from the Whitney<br />
---<strong>Georgia O'Keeffe</strong>, "Black Mesa Landscape, New Mexico / Out Back of Marie's II," 1930, Georgia O'Keeffe Museum<br />
---<strong>Man Ray</strong>, "Noire et Blanche," 1926, Museum of Modern Art<br />
---<strong>Aaron Douglas</strong>, "The Prodigal Son," 1927, Yale University's Beinecke Rare Book and Manuscript Library<br />
---<strong>Charles Sheeler</strong>, "American Landscape,"1930, also from MoMA<br />
---<strong>Joseph Stella</strong>, "Brooklyn Bridge," 1919-20, Yale University Art Gallery<br />
---<strong>Gerald Murphy</strong>, "Razor," 1924, Dallas Museum of Art<br />
---<strong>Marcel Duchamp</strong>, "Nude Descending a Staircase, No. 2," 1912, Philadelphia Museum of Art<br />
---<strong>Arthur Dove</strong>, "Fog Horns," 1929, Colorado Springs Fine Arts Center</blockquote></div>

]]></description>
            <link>http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2013/01/masterpiece_postage_museum_own.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2013/01/masterpiece_postage_museum_own.html</guid>
            
            
            <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 12:21:12 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Masterpiece Postage: USPS Commemorates the Armory Show&amp;#146s 100th Anniversary UPDATED</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><b>UPDATE</b>: The first day of issue for the "Modern Art in America" stamps will be Mar. 7. The release will be celebrated at New York's very different but identically named <a href="http://www.thearmoryshow.com/">Armory Show</a> at Piers 92 and 94, which opens to the public on the same day when the stamps will be issued.<br /><br />Should a new stamp be launched in connection with the opening of a commercial art fair? Maybe it should have been more appropriately scheduled at one of the nonprofit museums owning the works on the stamps. (Speaking of which, the USPS still hasn't provided me with that list of museums. Shouldn't they be credited?)<br /></blockquote>I just ordered four sheets. You'll probably want some too:<br /><br /><a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/Stamps4.jpg"><img alt="Stamps4.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/assets_c/2013/01/Stamps4-thumb-500x405-21872.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="405" width="500" /></a><br /> <div><i><b>Click on the image for larger view</b></i><br /><br /><strong><i><u>Top row</u></i>:</strong><strong> <strong>Charles Demuth</strong>, "I Saw the Figure 5 in Gold," 1928; </strong><strong><strong>John Marin,</strong> "Sunset, Maine Coast," 1919; </strong><strong><strong>Stuart Davis, </strong>"House and Street," 1931; </strong><strong><strong>Marsden Hartley, </strong>"Painting, Number 5," 1914-15<br /><i><u>Middle row</u>:</i> </strong><strong><strong><strong>Georgia O'Keeffe,</strong></strong> </strong><strong>"</strong><strong><strong><strong>Black Mesa Landscape</strong></strong></strong>, <strong><strong>New Mexico / Out Back of Marie's II," 1930;</strong> </strong><strong><strong>Man Ray, </strong></strong><strong><strong> "Noire et Blanche," 1926;</strong> </strong><strong>Aaron Douglas, "</strong><strong>The Prodigal Son," 1927</strong>; <strong>Charles Sheeler, "</strong><strong>American Landscape," 1930</strong><br /><i><u><b>Bottom Row</b></u>:</i> <strong> Joseph Stella</strong>, "<strong>Brooklyn Bridge," 1919-20; </strong><strong>Gerald Murphy, </strong>"<strong>Razor," 1924;</strong>&nbsp; <strong>Marcel Duchamp, </strong>"<strong>Nude Descending a Staircase, No. 2," 1912; </strong><strong>Arthur Dove,</strong> <strong> "Fog Horns," 1929</strong><br /><br />In celebration of the 100th anniversary of the landmark, controversial Armory Show in New York City, the U.S. Postal Service is issuing this sheet of 12 "Modern Art in America" forever stamps, with masterworks dating from 1913-1931. On the back of each stamp is information about the artist.<br /><br />You can pre-order them <a href="https://store.usps.com/store/browse/productDetailSingleSku.jsp?productId=S_579604&amp;categoryId=subcatS_S_Sheets#">here</a>. But neither the <a href="http://about.usps.com/news/national-releases/2012/pr12_146.htm">press release</a> nor the order page says when they will actually be issued. Nor is any credit given to the museum/owners of the originals. I know some of them: The Demuth, for example, is from the Metropolitan Museum. <br /><br />But instead of trying to cobble together the list, I'll wait until I hear back from the USPS. I have made repeated queries, starting yesterday, for this information and I'll update here if I receive an answer.<br /></div>



]]></description>
            <link>http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2013/01/masterpiece_postage_usps_comme.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2013/01/masterpiece_postage_usps_comme.html</guid>
            
            
            <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 11:56:21 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Who Is William Cole and Why Is He Leading a NY Times Online Discussion on the Art Market?</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<img alt="Stiges.jpg" src="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/Stiges.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="375" width="500" /><br /><b>Sitges, Spain</b><br /><br />Readers of the Letters column of the <b>NY Times</b> may have been surprised to see this <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/02/opinion/invitation-to-a-dialogue-an-art-market-bubble.html?smid=pl-share">Invitation to a Dialogue: An Art Market Bubble?</a> by one <b>William Cole</b> of Sitges, Spain, who "is working on a book [to be published by whom?] on art connoisseurship." He is one of the growing gaggle of <a href="http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2012/12/eyeballing_the_scream_at_moma.html">contemporary art detractors</a> who deride high-priced works as "outright junk." Times readers are invited to respond to Cole's screed for possible publication (and response by Cole) in the Times' Sunday Review Section.<br /><br />I for one will abstain.<br /><br />As we celebrate the 100th anniversary of the controversial, cutting-edge Armory Show in New York, let us not forget that history often proves that conservative naysayers are not soothsayers. That's not to suggest that all of today's art stars will be enshrined in the art history books, 100 years from now. But a blanket emperor-has-no-clothes denunciation of overpriced contemporary art is populist poppycock. "Overpriced" is in the pocketbook of the beholder.<br /><br />Who is this diatribe-scribe whom the Times has anointed as its Sunday discussion leader? Cole's Sitges, Spain, address provides a clue. <a href="http://www.en.zvab.com/profile/e0887c.jsp">This website</a> lists him as the owner of Cole &amp; Contreras Books/Sylvan Cole Gallery in that resort town near Barcelona. <br /><br /><b>Sylvan Cole</b>? He was a <a href="http://travel.nytimes.com/2005/06/09/arts/design/09cole.html">respected print dealer</a> in New York (from whom I once bought a lithograph as a gift for my parents). Sylvan insisted that intelligent art collecting was possible for people from all walks of life, and he had the voluminous, wide-ranging inventory to prove it. A 1994 article in the <b>Harvard Crimson</b> identified William as the New York print dealer's nephew and a teaching fellow and graduate student in French literature at Harvard, where he got his PhD in 1991.<br /><br />In his Times letter this week, Cole writes:<br /><br /><blockquote>The media play right along [with art-market hype], almost never questioning the quality of the works or the abilities of the artists.</blockquote>In Cole's case, the media are "playing along" with a letter writer's overheated thesis, without questioning the expertise or the background of the author.]]></description>
            <link>http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2013/01/who_is_william_cole_and_why_is.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2013/01/who_is_william_cole_and_why_is.html</guid>
            
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 16:04:21 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>
