[More on this story here.]
This statement just in from the Association of Art Museum Directors, regarding the news, first reported by CultureGrrl, that the National Academy Museum had sold two masterworks to fund operations:
Art museums collect works of art for the benefit of
present and future generations. The conservation, exhibition, and study
of the collection are the heart of a museum’s service to its community
and to the public.
It is therefore a fundamental professional principle
that works can only be deaccessioned to provide funds to acquire works
of art and enhance a museum’s collection. The Association of Art Museum
Directors is deeply concerned to learn that the National Academy Museum
has deaccessioned works of art from its collection to pay for operating
expenses. Prior to this decision, AAMD contacted the National Academy
in the hope that we could offer assistance in investigating alternatives
to deaccessioning, and to support the museum in upholding the highest
professional standards as it faces current challenges.
The National Academy is now breaching one of the most
basic and important of AAMD’s principles by treating its collection as a
financial asset, rather than the cornerstone of research, exhibition,
and public programming, a record of human creativity held in trust for
people now and in the future.
In the notification of its decision to AAMD last
evening, the National Academy voluntarily withdrew from membership in
the organization. It is not, however, membership in AAMD per se, but
rather a broader commitment to ethical museum practice that demands
adherence to the principles governing deaccessioning. Therefore, we
have no choice but to censure the National Academy for this action.
Consistent with AAMD’s Code of Ethics, we call on our members to suspend
any loans of works of art to and any collaborations on exhibitions with
the National Academy.