Make 'em laugh

Here's Christopher Hitchens in Vanity Fair on why men tend to be funnier than women and enjoy humor more than women (in general, that is -- you, of course, are wickedly funny): It's because women must contend with the really important, messy things in life -- giving birth and raising kids. Men get to act childish and be silly as a way of hiding the fact that they're not the ones really in charge. And men know that if you can make the woman laugh, you've eased up the tension a bit. It's a step forward.

OK, you may go ahead and argue with Mr. Hitchens if you disagree. A couple of years ago on Plastic.com the topic was why there were all of these sitcoms with dim shlubs married to (or dating) sharp, good-looking women (Everybody Loves Raymond, Grounded for Life, King of Queens, etc.).

This was my take on it:

Everyone has already said the obvious about the fantasies of a male-dominated entertainment industry, the desire to keep male audiences interested and the rather unsupported notion (but one widely held by women) that women are just plain smarter. But there's also the fact that many men develop their comic talents in their teens/twenties precisely because they're not scoring up there with Brad Pitt. It's one of the great forms of come-on compensation -- make 'em laugh.

I'm not saying Mr. Pitt can't do comedy, but that's not his primary appeal. He could be flat-out dreadful with a punchline and it would make squat difference to his popularity with women.

But look at the hordes of horny, unattractive men who succeeded through comedy and almost entirely through comedy: Charlie Chaplin, Milton Berle, Jerry Lewis, Jackie Gleason, the Belushis, Jim Carey, Howard Stern, Woody Allen, Mel Brooks, Bill Murray -- indeed, any male performer who ever started on Saturday Night Live -- the list goes on and on.

In fact, other than Tom Hanks and maybe Marcello Mastroianni, I can't think of a single, good-looking comic who is also an appealing person. That is, there are comics who may be considered good-looking by some women but there's something essentially needy or odd about them. Think of Gene Wilder or Steve Martin. And then there are comics whom women may find adorable because of their public personas but they're not exactly eye-pleasers. Think of Drew Carey.

It's not just that fat women don't get much respect in Hollywood and fat guys can. It's that comedy has long been a way for ordinary Joes to score, to get attention. It's been that way for ordinary Janes, too, but to a much, much lesser degree. Me, I like a witty woman (hello, Sarah Bird!), but a lot of men don't. In general, though, it's true: Great-looking men and women never had to develop their comic skills. Hollywood always casts brainless pretty people in absolutely everything. But let's say you're casting a sitcom and you need a guy to play the funny, shlubby, slightly dim hubbie.

You gonna hire Antonio Banderas? Or are you gonna try to put in a call for Homer Simpson?

December 11, 2006 9:58 AM | | Comments (5)

Categories:

5 Comments

I agree absolutely that there are and have been funny women. As I noted, I enjoy witty women -- some of my best friends ... etc. And I think one of the greatest of TV humorists has been Susan Harris, the creator-producer of Soap -- aka, the original Arrested Development.

But I have to say that giving individual examples of funny women tends to prove Hitchens' point, don't you think? In other words, they tend to be the exceptions (the fact that women were excluded from the performing/writing comedy tradition until relatively recently would be an obvious counterpoint to make here, but Hitchens more or less waves it away).

But, Lisa, to Hitchens' defense, he not only references Fran and Nora -- he calls them up and asks them about his theories. You see, he makes exceptions for lesbians (Fran and Ellen Degeneres) and Jews. Kind of him.

Michael:

The weakness in a couple of your examples of funny women is that they're funny performers who were generally relating a male writer's dialogue. Most male comics, if they're not spouting their own material, are generally spouting other guys'.

Jerome

Um, Lucille Ball? Gracie Allen? Gilda Radner? And the list goes on...

On the literary side, who's funnier than Jane Austen (OK, Jonathan Swift, but you get my point). At his Manhattan literary soirees, does Hitchens never bump into Fran Leibowitz? Nora Ephron? Maureen Dowd?

If Hitchens really wants to write persuasive essays that ignore all facts contrary to his point, perhaps the Creation Science folks would like to hire him.

I am reminded of the Lenny Bruce routine, responding to the racist cliche, "Would you want one of them to marry your daughter?' In this sketch, Lenny imagines forcing the Grand Dragon of the Ku Klux Klan to say whether he would rather marry a black, black woman or a white, white woman, when the black woman is Lena Horne and the white woman is Kate Smith.

"If we want to get down to basics, let's persecute the ugly people," Lenny said.

That is the issue here, regardless of gender. Unattractiveness is pain in this culture. Humor is an excellent tool for coping with pain. It is also a devestating weapon of self defense. If you are small and weak, what better way is there to keep from getting beaten up than to tell a joke that makes the bully laugh? If you are being tormented, what better way to change the subject, than to mock someone else's shortcomings?

I recall laughing out loud at the writing of Dorothy Parker, Flannery O'Connor, and the performances of Myrna Loy (in the "Thin Man" movies), Audrey Meadows (in "The Honeymooners"), etc., etc., There was smartness is their humor, but an edge that suggested a lot of pain.

Of course, I should also mention the exquisite comic timing of the decidedly attractive but no less tormented Marilyn Monroe in movies like "The Seven Year Itch." I think humor emerges from inner demons, not from gonads.

I'm not surprised that Hitchens turns a discussion of comedy into a sexist claim of male supremacy in humor. He's not exactly the smartest bear in the zoo, even if he writes for a self-important magazine like Vanity Fair. He should go back to writing laughably wrong-headed screeds about the Iraq War.

My highly tuned sense of humor comes from the fact that I had to "contend with the really important, messy things in life -- giving birth and raising kids" while my husband thought it was strictly woman's work.

And for the record:
1) Brad is the pits, except in Thelma & Louise,
2) Tom Hanks and Antonio Banderas are not good looking,
3) I don't like the Simpsons,
4) I hate the wives in the sitcoms you listed,
5) and Sandra Bullock cracks me up. She would be great playing Stephanie Plum if a movie is ever made of Janet Evanovich's books.

Of course, the story was always that Berle had one other advantage over most lesser men....

Leave a comment

Recommending

Books I'm currently recommending . . . 

lush%20life.jpg

Richard Price's best novel since Clockers, Lush Life is a slice of life on the Lower East Side, complete with the ghetto kids, the new bohemians, the old Jews and the cops. A restaurant manager at 35 fears he's no longer the wannabe artiste who'd turn into a full-blown artiste some day. When he sees a younger version of himself get shot during a mugging (and then gets blamed by the cops), he comes apart. Price takes these cultures and stares through all of them. Lush Life is a crime novel, a terrific literary thriller, a sampler of Price's namebrand talents with dialogue and deadpan humor. Price is after more than just law-and-order, crime-and-punishment, justice-is-served. This is a portrait of big-city America..You think The Wire, Law and Order, the old Homicide are the best TV has to offer? This is all that -- between covers.

In Life Class, Booker Prize-winner Pat Barker returns to World War I, the setting for her magnificent Restoration trilogy. Where those novels followed shell-shocked poets Siegfried Sassoon and Wilfrid Owen through their convalescence, Life Class follows three painting students (based on real Slade School artists Christopher Nevinson and Paul Nash) as the war approaches. Elinor wants little to do with the war or with men: They're distractions from her art. Kit, a hot, young futurist, is primed for the war's industrialized destruction, while Paul flees his working-class background. As usual with Barker, the sexual relationships, war-time atmosphere and gruesome battlefield details are brilliantly conveyed: Her prose is lean but lyrical, compassionate yet cool-headed. No character is quite as compelling as Regeneration's bitter bisexual, Billy Prior, but the Great War's upheavals in art and combat, sex and class, provide Barker with material for exceptional historical novels. A new trilogy? One hopes so.

more

Best of the Vault

THE REVIEWS: 

Pat Barker, Frankenstein, Cass Sunstein on the internet, Samuel Johnson, Thrillers, Denis Johnson, Alan Furst, Caryl Phillips, Richard Flanagan, George Saunders, Michael Harvey, Larry McMurtry, Harry Potter and more ...

ESSAY: 

Big D between the sheets -- Dallas in fiction

ESSAY:  

Reviewing the state of reviewing

ESSAY:  

9/11 as a novel: Why?

ESSAY:  

How can critics say the things they do? And why does anyone pay attention? It's the issue of authority.

The disappearing book pages:  

Papers are cutting book coverage for little reason

Thrillers and Lists:  

Noir favorites, who makes the cut and why

more

Blogroll

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by book/daddy published on December 11, 2006 9:58 AM.

Wouldn't you know it ... was the previous entry in this blog.

I'm off . . . is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

AJ Ads

Introducing
AJ Arts Blog Ads

Now you can reach the most discerning arts blog readers on the internet. Target individual blogs or topics in the ArtsJournal ad network.

Advertise Here

AJ Blogs

AJBlogCentral | rss

special
Program Notes
the blog of the National Performing Arts Convention
culture
About Last Night
Terry Teachout on the arts in New York City
Artful Manager
Andrew Taylor on the business of arts & culture
blog riley
rock culture approximately
CultureGulf
Rebuilding Gulf Culture after Katrina
diacritical
Douglas McLennan's blog
Flyover
Art from the American Outback
Life's a Pitch
For immediate release: the arts are marketable
Mind the Gap
No genre is the new genre
Rockwell Matters
John Rockwell on the arts
Straight Up |
Jan Herman - arts, media & culture with 'tude

dance
Foot in Mouth
Apollinaire Scherr talks about dance
Seeing Things
Tobi Tobias on dance et al...

jazz
Jazz Beyond Jazz
Howard Mandel's freelance Urban Improvisation
ListenGood
Focus on New Orleans. Jazz and Other Sounds
Rifftides
Doug Ramsey on Jazz and other matters...

media
Out There
Jeff Weinstein's Cultural Mixology
Serious Popcorn
Martha Bayles on Film...

classical music
The Future of Classical Music?
Greg Sandow performs a book-in-progress
On the Record
Exploring Orchestras w/ Henry Fogel
Overflow
Harvey Sachs on music, and various digressions
PostClassic
Kyle Gann on music after the fact
Sandow
Greg Sandow on the future of Classical Music
Slipped Disc
Norman Lebrecht on Shifting Sound Worlds

publishing
book/daddy
Jerome Weeks on Books
Quick Study
Scott McLemee on books, ideas & trash-culture ephemera

theatre
Drama Queen
Wendy Rosenfield: covering drama, onstage and off
lies like truth
Chloe Veltman on how culture will save the world
Stage Write
Elizabeth Zimmer on time-based art forms

visual
Aesthetic Grounds
Public Art, Public Space
Artopia
John Perreault's art diary
CultureGrrl
Lee Rosenbaum's Cultural Commentary
Modern Art Notes
Tyler Green's modern & contemporary art blog
Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.