Slicing the pie horizontally « PREV | NEXT »: Presenters to the left of me, presenters to the right of me

Way beyond butts in seats

Many of us have complained about the metrics we use in the arts to inform our management and measure our success. Number of tickets sold. Growth/decline in audience numbers year over year. Overall budget growth. These are inelegant and off-mission indicators that distract us rather than focus our work. But our complaints always ended the same way: what else is there?

Intrinsic Impacts StudyBlissfully, a new and extraordinary research study on the impact of cultural experience has dived right into the deep end to find out.

The WolfBrown report, Assessing the Intrinsic Impacts of a Live Performance, just released from embargo this month and posted yesterday for free download, works to bring both intent and insight to the transformative power of live performance. Says the report summary:

The true impact of performing arts experiences is what happens to individual audience members when the lights go down and the artist takes the stage -- and the cumulative benefits to individuals, families and communities of having those experiences available night after night, year after year. If this is true, it would seem that efforts to assess the impact of arts programs would aim to better understand and measure how audience members are transformed -- what happens to them in their seats.

Most other discussions on intrinsic value conclude that we lack the language and the tools to discuss and measure such values. This effort takes that conclusion as its beginning. The three driving assumptions behind the work are simply stated but radically conceived:

  1. Intrinsic impacts derived from attending a live performance can be measured
  2. Different types of performances create different sets of intrinsic impacts
  3. An individual's 'readiness-to-receive' a performing arts experience influences the nature and extent of impacts.

I'll be digging into this report in greater detail in the weeks to come (I'll be attending a series of discussions involving its findings at the upcoming Arts Presenters conference to help me understand it more clearly myself). But I wanted to provide the pointer as soon as it was available.

This is important stuff.

Thanks to Alan Brown and his team for taking on the challenge. And thanks to the consortium of leading university presenters that brought their money, their time, and their significant attention to the project to bring it to life.

January 9, 2008 8:48 AM | | Comments (3) |

Categories:

3 Comments

Joe,

You'll find the survey protocol as Appendix 1 of the full report, available for download on the link provided. Evaluate away!

Where's the beef?! Without sharing (and thus being able to evaluate) the assessment tool (the survey) we have no way of knowing how valuable this project really is!

Andrew, thank you so much for this link -- I am agog at the rightness of this approach, and can't wait to dig deeper to see what they've found.

Having spent over 25 years working in theater and the performing arts, I can't even count the number of times I've argued this approach. I've long felt that the recent past's overwhelming focus on studying the economic value of the arts to a community is helpful, but misses the point. This is particularly true, it seems, in the case of some performing arts presenters. My own experience in that field left me with the feeling that the nature of what was presented was always secondary to growth. This free-market approach to programming, in which the goal is to continue to increase profitability, seems to me to be, as the study suggests, in direct opposition to the stated mission of most organizations.

More depressing than that, I have more than once seen organizations actually change their mission statement to diminish focus on the "intrinsic" impact of the art, instead phrasing their ideas in terms of market penetration.

Perhaps this study, along with recent discussions regarding the efficacy of focusing on economic impact studies as a tool for justifying funding, will at least bring the importance of the actual art back into the discussion.

I certainly hope so!

Leave a comment

About...

...The Artful Manager
What if we fundamentally misunderstood what it meant to run the arts "like a business"? more...

...Andrew Taylor
Andrew TaylorAmong other things, he's Director of an MBA degree program in Arts Administration. more...

Get your MBA in Arts Administration

Social Networks

Follow me on Twitter
View Andrew Taylor's profile on LinkedIn
ConnectCP International

Archives

Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

AJ Ads

Introducing
AJ Arts Blog Ads

Now you can reach the most discerning arts blog readers on the internet. Target individual blogs or topics in the ArtsJournal ad network.

Advertise Here

AJ Blogs

AJBlogCentral | rss

culture
About Last Night
Terry Teachout on the arts in New York City
Artful Manager
Andrew Taylor on the business of arts & culture
blog riley
rock culture approximately
critical difference
Laura Collins-Hughes on arts, culture and coverage
Dewey21C
Richard Kessler on arts education
diacritical
Douglas McLennan's blog
Dog Days
Dalouge Smith advocates for the Arts
Flyover
Art from the American Outback
Life's a Pitch
For immediate release: the arts are marketable
Mind the Gap
No genre is the new genre
Performance Monkey
David Jays on theatre and dance
Plain English
Paul Levy measures the Angles
Real Clear Arts
Judith H. Dobrzynski on Culture
Rockwell Matters
John Rockwell on the arts
Straight Up |
Jan Herman - arts, media & culture with 'tude

dance
Foot in Mouth
Apollinaire Scherr talks about dance
Seeing Things
Tobi Tobias on dance et al...

jazz
Jazz Beyond Jazz
Howard Mandel's freelance Urban Improvisation
ListenGood
Focus on New Orleans. Jazz and Other Sounds
Rifftides
Doug Ramsey on Jazz and other matters...

media
Out There
Jeff Weinstein's Cultural Mixology
Serious Popcorn
Martha Bayles on Film...

classical music
Creative Destruction
Fresh ideas on building arts communities
The Future of Classical Music?
Greg Sandow performs a book-in-progress
On the Record
Exploring Orchestras w/ Henry Fogel
Overflow
Harvey Sachs on music, and various digressions
PianoMorphosis
Bruce Brubaker on all things Piano
PostClassic
Kyle Gann on music after the fact
Sandow
Greg Sandow on the future of Classical Music
Slipped Disc
Norman Lebrecht on Shifting Sound Worlds

publishing
book/daddy
Jerome Weeks on Books
Quick Study
Scott McLemee on books, ideas & trash-culture ephemera

theatre
Drama Queen
Wendy Rosenfield: covering drama, onstage and off
lies like truth
Chloe Veltman on how culture will save the world

visual
Aesthetic Grounds
Public Art, Public Space
Another Bouncing Ball
Regina Hackett takes her Art To Go
Artopia
John Perreault's art diary
CultureGrrl
Lee Rosenbaum's Cultural Commentary
Modern Art Notes
Tyler Green's modern & contemporary art blog