AJ Logo an ARTSJOURNAL weblog | ArtsJournal Home | AJ Blog Central

« TT: A little traveling music, maestro | Main | TT: Almanac »

April 7, 2008

TT: After the fact

dylan.jpgThe big news in today's Pulitzer Prizes is that Bob Dylan was honored with a special citation for "his profound impact on popular music and American culture, marked by lyrical compositions of extraordinary poetic power." A little late, I'd say.

As for the other prizes awarded in the non-journalistic categories of "letters, drama, and music," I can only speak with authority about the awarding of the drama prize to Tracy Letts' August: Osage County, which was unquestionably superior to its competition. For what it's worth, here's what I wrote about it in The Wall Street Journal last year:

As an ardent supporter of Chicago theater, I'm overjoyed that one of that city's best-known troupes has come east to strut its stuff: The Steppenwolf Theatre Company is performing Tracy Letts's "August: Osage County" on Broadway. Mr. Letts's new play is a 13-character, 3½-hour monster about the Westons, an Oklahoma family so dysfunctional that it's a wonder they're not all dead. Repeat after me: adultery, alcoholism, drug addiction, incest. One of them is even a poet!

No doubt it sounds like Tennessee Williams on a bender, but what makes "August: Osage County" so excitingly watchable is that Mr. Letts has (mostly) chosen to play these grim matters for laughs. The horrific family dinner at which Mom Weston (Deanna Dunagan) pops a double handful of downers and starts settling scores is a glittering piece of black comedy, and the cast, consummately well directed by Anna D. Shapiro, plays it to perfection. Ms. Dunagan and Amy Morton (who gives a commanding performance as Barbara, the oldest Weston daughter) will surely be remembered at Tony time, but everyone deserves a group award for ensemble acting above and beyond the call of duty.

There's a catch, and it's a huge one: The hour-long first act is a pretentious piece of superfluous exposition that could and should have been cut. I suppose I ought not to suggest that you come late (nudge, nudge), but if you do choose to see the whole thing, take my word that it gets better--a whole lot better--after the first intermission.

Is that the stuff Pulitzers are made of? I suppose so, though the drama prize has had a fairly impressive batting average in recent years. Anna in the Tropics, Doubt, and I Am My Own Wife all won--but, then, so, did the utterly unmemorable Rabbit Hole. August: Osage County isn't a great play, but we don't get many of those, and it's a solid, exciting piece of work, so I'm not complaining.

As for the other non-journalistic awards, I haven't read any of the books that won, nor had I heard David Lang's The Little Match Girl Passion, which won the music prize. You can listen to it here, which I did after the prizes were announced this afternoon. (It's pretty enough, but I wasn't impressed.) Truth to tell, I hadn't even heard of any of the winning titles, and I think of myself as being more or less culturally literate. I did read two of the finalists for the biography prize, Martin Duberman's The Worlds of Lincoln Kirstein and Zachary Leader's The Life of Kingsley Amis, neither of which I thought prizeworthy, and one of the finalists for general nonfiction, Alex Ross' The Rest Is Noise: Listening to the Twentieth Century, a brilliant and important book which I reviewed with the utmost enthusiasm in Commentary last year. (Alex's blog is here.)

All of which says...what? Not very much, I fear. Nor are the Pulitzers nearly as important, culturally speaking, as they used to be, though they continue to ensure that their winners will be mentioned at least once in every major newspaper in America, which beats hell out of a sharp stick in the eye. Still, I doubt that this year's winners will get much more traction in the media after the ink has dried on their citations, since American newspapers are increasingly turning their backs on high-culture coverage of all kinds. I wonder, for instance, what percentage of the papers that will be announcing the victory of John Matteson's Eden's Outcasts: The Story of Louisa May Alcott and Her Father in tomorrow morning's editions bothered to run a review of the book when it was published.

Incidentally, one Michael S. Malone informed the world the other day that my blogging ought to receive a Pulitzer Prize for cultural criticism. Alas, it was all too plain to see that he was using me, Matt Drudge, Arianna Huffington, Mickey Kaus, Markos Moulitsas, Glenn Reynolds, and Michael Yon (talk about mixed company!) as sticks with which to beat the Old Media. This had the inevitable effect of diluting his compliment: "On Tuesday, the Pulitzer Prizes will be announced. And if they are anything like last year, the journalism awards will go to the usual collection of dying newspapers...There will be the usual flurry of media, and then those newspapers will go back to dying."

Needless to say, the Pulitzers in journalism are for newspapers, not blogs (or magazines or radio documentaries, for that matter). And if I ever win one, it will presumably be for my work as a newspaperman, which takes up most of my time and energy. I love blogging, but I get paid to write for The Wall Street Journal, and far more people read me there than on "About Last Night." Yes, the newspaper business is in trouble--bad trouble--but it isn't dead yet.

At the same time, though, I wouldn't dream of denying that precious few newspapers (mine fortunately excepted) are doing their duty, or anything like it, to high culture in America and the world. Which is why it strikes me as faintly hypocritical that they should continue to devote one day out of the year to praising a playwright, a composer, and a half-dozen writers--and Bob Dylan, who needs a Pulitzer Prize a lot less than the Pulitzer Prizes need Bob Dylan.

Posted April 7, 2008 4:23 PM

Tell A Friend

Email this entry to:


Your email address:


Message (optional):